IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i23p12575-d690729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling Digital Health Innovation: Developing a New ‘Service Readiness Level’ Framework of Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Janette Hughes

    (Digital Health & Care Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, Inovo Building, 121 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK)

  • Marilyn Lennon

    (Department of Computing & Information Science, Livingstone Tower, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Robert J. Rogerson

    (Technology & Innovation Centre, Institute for Future Cities, University of Strathclyde, 99 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK)

  • George Crooks

    (Digital Health & Care Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, Inovo Building, 121 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK)

Abstract

Digital innovation has scaled exponentially in many sectors including tourism, banking, and retail. It is well cited that the health sector is slower to embrace digital health innovations (DHI) beyond the pilot stage and consequently, many successful DHI pilot projects have failed to scale up. Such failure arises in part from a knowledge gap around what type and level of evidence are needed to convince implementers and decision makers to fund, endorse, or adopt new innovations into care delivery systems and sustainable practice. Much is known about the range of DHI evaluation methods used; however, less is published on the evidence that decision makers need to move innovations to scale. This paper draws on interviews (N = 18) with decision makers/project leads engaged in DHI in Scotland to identify what evidence matters when making DHI adoption/scale decisions. The results are used to present a heuristic service readiness level (SRL) framework that captures the changing nature of the evidence base required over a project lifecycle for progression to scale. We utilise this framework to discuss ‘what evidence’ is required and ‘how data accumulate’ over time to assist project teams to build a ‘DHI case for scale’.

Suggested Citation

  • Janette Hughes & Marilyn Lennon & Robert J. Rogerson & George Crooks, 2021. "Scaling Digital Health Innovation: Developing a New ‘Service Readiness Level’ Framework of Evidence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12575-:d:690729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/23/12575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Rowley, 2012. "Conducting research interviews," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3/4), pages 260-271, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maroun, Warren & Solomon, Jill, 2014. "Whistle-blowing by external auditors: Seeking legitimacy for the South African Audit Profession?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 109-121.
    2. Jonas Hammerschmidt & Fabian Eggers & Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Matthias Filser, 2020. "Entrepreneurial orientation in sports entrepreneurship - a mixed methods analysis of professional soccer clubs in the German-speaking countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 839-857, September.
    3. Jonas Hammerschmidt & Fabian Eggers & Sascha Kraus & Paul Jones & Matthias Filser, 0. "Entrepreneurial orientation in sports entrepreneurship - a mixed methods analysis of professional soccer clubs in the German-speaking countries," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    4. Katharina Löhr & Christian Hochmuth & Frieder Graef & Jane Wambura & Stefan Sieber, 2017. "Conflict management programs in trans-disciplinary research projects: the case of a food security project in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1189-1201, December.
    5. Karolina Bähr & Alexander Fliaster, 2023. "The twofold transition: Framing digital innovations and incumbents' value propositions for sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 920-935, February.
    6. Craig Langston & Weiwei Zhang, 2021. "DfMA: Towards an Integrated Strategy for a More Productive and Sustainable Construction Industry in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. David Rosenbaum & A. M. Elizabeth More & Peter Steane, 2016. "Applying Grounded Theory to Investigating Change Management in the Nonprofit Sector," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(4), pages 21582440166, November.
    8. Anglin, Aaron H. & Wolfe, Marcus T. & Short, Jeremy C. & McKenny, Aaron F. & Pidduck, Robert J., 2018. "Narcissistic rhetoric and crowdfunding performance: A social role theory perspective," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 780-812.
    9. Silvana Secinaro & Davide Calandra & Carolina Cappa & Emanuele Bignamini, 2020. "La qualit? dei dati all?interno dell?evoluzione dei servizi territoriali: il caso del Servizio Dipendenze," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(116), pages 31-51.
    10. Monica Cerdan Chiscano & Ana Isabel Jiménez-Zarco, 2021. "Towards an Inclusive Museum Management Strategy. An Exploratory Study of Consumption Experience in Visitors with Disabilities. The Case of the CosmoCaixa Science Museum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Brett Anthony White & John Dumay, 2020. "The angel investment decision: insights from Australian business angels," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3133-3162, September.
    12. Wang, Miaomiao & Mühlbacher, Hans & Wittmann, Xinhua & Perrett, Pieter, 2021. "Dynamic collaboration between small- and medium-sized enterprises from highly dissimilar markets," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 185-200.
    13. Stathakopoulos, Vlasis & Kottikas, Konstantinos G. & Painesis, Grigorios & Theodorakis, Ioannis G. & Kottika, Efthymia, 2022. "Why shape a market? Empirical evidence on the prominent firm-level and market-level outcomes of market-driving strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1240-1254.
    14. Sally Wightman & Garrett Potts & Ron Beadle, 2023. "‘Whose Call?’ The Conflict Between Tradition-Based and Expressivist Accounts of Calling," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 947-962, April.
    15. Valeria Lo Iacono & Paul Symonds & David H.K. Brown, 2016. "Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 103-117, May.
    16. Joachim Josef Nigg & Sarah Eichelberger, 2021. "Sustainable Product Development for Accessible Tourism: Case Studies Demonstrating the Need for Stakeholder Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Maroun, Warren & Atkins, Jill, 2014. "Section 45 of the Auditing Profession Act: Blowing the whistle for audit quality?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 248-263.
    18. Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele & Mühlbacher, Hans & Taishoff, Marika, 2020. "Exploring consumers’ subjective shopping experiences in directly operated luxury brand stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    19. Saif Mir & John A. Aloysius & Stephanie Eckerd, 2017. "Understanding Supplier Switching Behavior: The Role of Psychological Contracts in a Competitive Setting," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(3), pages 3-18, July.
    20. Amodeo, Domenico C. & Francis, Royce A., 2019. "The role of protocol layers and macro-cognitive functions in engineered system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:23:p:12575-:d:690729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.