IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i1p21582440241227280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Perceived Personal Brand Equity of Knowledge Workers by Gender in Light of Knowledge-Driven Organizational Culture: Evidence From Poland and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Wioleta Kucharska

Abstract

This study contributes to the limited literature on the personal branding of knowledge workers by revealing that a culture that incorporates knowledge, learning, and collaboration supports (explicit and tacit) knowledge sharing among employees and that sharing matters for knowledge workers’ self-perceived personal brand equity. Analysis of 2,168 cases from the United States and Poland using structural equation modeling (SEM) showed that this knowledge-sharing mechanism differs by country and gender. Findings revealed that in the United States, the knowledge culture and collaboration culture are highly correlated and dominate the learning culture. In both countries, the mistake acceptance component of the learning culture is not supported by knowledge culture as strongly as is the climate component. These findings reveal a bias concerning the acceptance of mistakes as a potential source of learning observed if the culture of knowledge dominates. Moreover, this study uncovers some significant gender differences that might be caused by the gender stereotypes existing in STEM (science, technology, engineering, mathematics). Finally, the study confirms that knowledge workers’ personal branding is a potent motive to smoothen and increase the knowledge-sharing flow in knowledge-driven organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wioleta Kucharska, 2024. "Self-Perceived Personal Brand Equity of Knowledge Workers by Gender in Light of Knowledge-Driven Organizational Culture: Evidence From Poland and the United States," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(1), pages 21582440241, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241227280
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241227280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241227280
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241227280?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mueller, Julia, 2014. "A specific knowledge culture: Cultural antecedents for knowledge sharing between project teams," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 190-202.
    2. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    3. Anna Gorska & Grzegorz Mazurek, 2021. "The effect of the CEO media coverage on corporate brand equity: evidence from Poland," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 12(2), pages 499-523, June.
    4. repec:ehu:cuader:15473 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Anna Kwak, 2022. "The Polish family in transition: a shift towards greater gender equality?," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 340-352, August.
    6. Julien-Chinn, Francie J. & Lietz, Cynthia A., 2019. "Building learning cultures in the child welfare workforce," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 360-365.
    7. Jário Santos & Ig Bittencourt & Marcelo Reis & Geiser Chalco & Seiji Isotani, 2022. "Two billion registered students affected by stereotyped educational environments: an analysis of gender-based color bias," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. John Hulland & Hans Baumgartner & Keith Marion Smith, 2018. "Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 92-108, January.
    9. Kaili Zhang & Bin Zhao & Kui Yin, 2024. "When Leaders Acknowledge Their Own Errors, Will Employees Follow Suit? A Social Learning Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(2), pages 403-421, January.
    10. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Gupta, Shivam & Busso, Donatella & Kamboj, Shampy, 2021. "Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 788-798.
    11. Manel Khedher, 2019. "Conceptualizing and researching personal branding effects on the employability," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(2), pages 99-109, March.
    12. Fuller, Christie M. & Simmering, Marcia J. & Atinc, Guclu & Atinc, Yasemin & Babin, Barry J., 2016. "Common methods variance detection in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3192-3198.
    13. Brooke Erin Duffy & Megan Sawey, 2022. "In/Visibility in Social Media Work: The Hidden Labor Behind the Brands," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 77-87.
    14. Alvaro Turriago-Hoyos & Ulf Thoene & Surendra Arjoon, 2016. "Knowledge Workers and Virtues in Peter Drucker’s Management Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, March.
    15. Olaisen, Johan & Revang, Oivind, 2018. "Exploring the performance of tacit knowledge: How to make ordinary people deliver extraordinary results in teams," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 295-304.
    16. Kucharska, Wioleta, 2022. "Tacit knowledge influence on intellectual capital and innovativeness in the healthcare sector: A cross-country study of Poland and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 869-883.
    17. Andrej Miklosik & Nina Evans & Maria Hasprova & Julia Lipianska, 2019. "Reflection of embedded knowledge culture in communications of Australian companies," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 172-181, April.
    18. Sheng, Margaret L., 2019. "Foreign tacit knowledge and a capabilities perspective on MNEs’ product innovativeness: Examining source-recipient knowledge absorption platforms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 154-163.
    19. Kevin Zheng Zhou & Caroline Bingxin Li, 2012. "How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9), pages 1090-1102, September.
    20. Veronica Ioana ILIEȘ, 2018. "Strategic Personal Branding For Students And Young Professionals," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 43-51, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lijie Feng & Zhenzhen Zhao & Jinfeng Wang & Ke Zhang, 2022. "The Impact of Knowledge Management Capabilities on Innovation Performance from Dynamic Capabilities Perspective: Moderating the Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Kucharska, Wioleta, 2022. "Tacit knowledge influence on intellectual capital and innovativeness in the healthcare sector: A cross-country study of Poland and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 869-883.
    3. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    4. Lussier, Bruno & Philp, Matthew & Hartmann, Nathaniel N. & Wieland, Heiko, 2021. "Social anxiety and salesperson performance: The roles of mindful acceptance and perceived sales manager support," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 112-125.
    5. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    6. Woo-Sung Choi & Seung-Wan Kang & Suk Bong Choi, 2022. "Creativity in the South Korean Workplace: Procedural Justice, Abusive Supervision, and Competence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    7. Pandey, Jatin & Gupta, Manish & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup & Hassan, Yusuf & Kukreja, Priyam, 2021. "Technology-enabled knowledge management for community healthcare workers: The effects of knowledge sharing and knowledge hiding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 787-799.
    8. Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Lim, Xin-Jean & Ting, Hiram & Liu, Yide & Quach, Sara, 2022. "Are privacy concerns still relevant? Revisiting consumer behaviour in omnichannel retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    9. Muhammad Ali Butt & Faisal Nawaz & Saddam Hussain & Maria José Sousa & Minhong Wang & Muhammad Saleem Sumbal & Muhammad Shujahat, 2019. "Individual knowledge management engagement, knowledge-worker productivity, and innovation performance in knowledge-based organizations: the implications for knowledge processes and knowledge-based sys," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 336-356, September.
    10. Leone, Maria Isabella & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Natalicchio, Angelo, 2022. "Boundary spanning through external technology acquisition: The moderating role of star scientists and upstream alliances," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Tobias Pehrsson & Navid Ghannad & Anders Pehrsson & Tobias Abt & Siyuan Chen & Fabian Erath & Tobias Hammarstig, 2015. "Dynamic capabilities and performance in foreign markets: Developments within international new ventures," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 28-48, March.
    12. Shujahat, Muhammad & Sousa, Maria José & Hussain, Saddam & Nawaz, Faisal & Wang, Minhong & Umer, Muhammad, 2019. "Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 442-450.
    13. Gema Albort-Morant & Antonio Leal-Millán & Gabriel Cepeda-Carrion & Jörg Henseler, 2018. "Developing green innovation performance by fostering of organizational knowledge and coopetitive relations," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 499-517, March.
    14. Augusto, Mário & Godinho, Pedro & Torres, Pedro, 2019. "Building customers’ resilience to negative information in the airline industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 235-248.
    15. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Adomako, Samuel, 2021. "The effects of knowledge integration and contextual ambidexterity on innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 312-321.
    16. Yan Xin & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "Knowledge Reuse in Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, November.
    17. Muhammad Zafar Yaqub & Abdullah Alsabban, 2023. "Knowledge Sharing through Social Media Platforms in the Silicon Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Felix Kipkosgei & Seung-Wan Kang & Suk Bong Choi, 2020. "A Team-Level Study of the Relationship between Knowledge Sharing and Trust in Kenya: Moderating Role of Collaborative Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    19. Kristoffersen, Eivind & Mikalef, Patrick & Blomsma, Fenna & Li, Jingyue, 2021. "The effects of business analytics capability on circular economy implementation, resource orchestration capability, and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    20. Zhang, Ningning & You, Dingyi & Tang, Le & Wen, Ke, 2023. "Knowledge path dependence, external connection, and radical inventions: Evidence from Chinese Academy of Sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:21582440241227280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.