IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231219110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logotype as a Tool in Marketing Communication: An Analysisof Websites of Agritourism Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Godlewski
  • Adam Marciniak
  • Anna M. Zarzycka

Abstract

A logotype can have a considerable impact on the customers’ perception of a given business, generate experiences and become a basis for assigning specific associations to the brand (positive, negative, promotional). The aim of the present study is to verify the function of logotypes of selected agritourism establishments, especially in view of the rationale for placing them on home pages of websites, and the marketing function they fulfill. Homepages (the main web pages) of websites of 10 agritourism farms with the dimensions of 1,245 × 570 pixels (and 24 -bit color depth) were analyzed. The study involved 170 respondents ( n  = 170), whose task was to indicate a single element they perceive as positive, negative, and one that in their opinion best serves the promotional goal in each of the 10 homepages. Statistical analyses were performed using the R-CRAN software version 4.0.2. The study confirmed that there are both differences and similarities in the responses regarding logotypes of the agritourism farms studied. The perception of the logotype depends strongly on the education level and age of respondents. The analyses also confirmed that there is no linear relationship between the size of the logo and the frequency at which it is indicated as a promotional element. The use of a detailed factor analysis of logotypes (with the use of the click-tracking technique) on the websites of agritourism farms is an innovative approach and allows for a relatively comprehensive assessment of the perception of logotypes by potential consumers of offers available on the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Godlewski & Adam Marciniak & Anna M. Zarzycka, 2023. "Logotype as a Tool in Marketing Communication: An Analysisof Websites of Agritourism Farms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231219110
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231219110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231219110
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231219110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brigitte Muller & Bruno Kocher & Antoine Crettaz, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Post-Print hal-00772061, HAL.
    2. Brigitte Muller & Bruno Kocher & Antoine Crettaz, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Post-Print hal-01810515, HAL.
    3. Phillip, Sharon & Hunter, Colin & Blackstock, Kirsty, 2010. "A typology for defining agritourism," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 754-758.
    4. Tatiana M. Fajardo & Jiao Zhang & Michael Tsiros, 2016. "The Contingent Nature of the Symbolic Associations of Visual Design Elements: The Case of Brand Logo Frames," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(4), pages 549-566.
    5. Olivier Droulers, 2016. "Heraldry and brand logotypes: 800 years of color combinations," Post-Print halshs-02024779, HAL.
    6. Rosa Maria Fanelli & Luca Romagnoli, 2020. "Customer Satisfaction with Farmhouse Facilities and Its Implications for the Promotion of Agritourism Resources in Italian Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Law, Rob & Qi, Shanshan & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2010. "Progress in tourism management: A review of website evaluation in tourism research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 297-313.
    8. Yuwei Jiang & Gerald J. Gorn & Maria Galli & Amitava Chattopadhyay, 2016. "Does Your Company Have the Right Logo? How and Why Circular- and Angular-Logo Shapes Influence Brand Attribute Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Oxford University Press, vol. 42(5), pages 709-726.
    9. Müller, Brigitte & Kocher, Bruno & Crettaz, Antoine, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 82-88.
    10. Ari-Matti Erjansola & Jukka Lipponen & Kimmo Vehkalahti & Hanna-Mari Aula & Anna-Maija Pirttilä-Backman, 2021. "From the brand logo to brand associations and the corporate identity: visual and identity-based logo associations in a university merger," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 241-253, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Brune & Whitney Knollenberg & Olivia Vilá, 2024. "Building Tourism Resilience through Communication," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-9, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Fei & Su, Qiulai & Mou, Jian, 2021. "Understanding the effect of website logos as animated spokescharacters on the advertising: A lens of parasocial interaction relationship," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Sophie Lacoste-Badie & Junwei Yu & Olivier Droulers, 2020. "Small change, big change – Increasing attention with product package variations," Post-Print hal-04445762, HAL.
    3. Muhammad Rashid Rafiq & Rai Imtiaz Hussain & Shahbaz Hussain, 2020. "The Impact of Logo Shapes Redesign on Brand Loyalty and Repurchase Intentions through Brand Attitude," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 117-126.
    4. Septianto, Felix & Kwon, Junbum, 2022. "Too cute to be bad? Cute brand logo reduces consumer punishment following brand transgressions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1108-1126.
    5. Teng, Lefa & Xie, Chenxin & Liu, Tianjiao & Wang, Fan & Foti, Lianne, 2021. "The effects of uppercase vs. lowercase letters on consumers’ perceptions and brand attitudes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 164-175.
    6. Živa Kolbl & Maja Konečnik Ruzzier & Tomaž Kolar, 2015. "Brand Revitalization: Don't Let Your Brands Turn into Sleepyheads," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-11.
    7. Baumert, Thomas & de Obesso, María de las Mercedes, 2021. "Brand antiquity and value perception: Are customers willing to pay higher prices for older brands?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 241-254.
    8. Dr. Lady & Andrean Kie, 2020. "Effects of Social Media on Purchase Intention and Brand Equity of Marketplace Sites in Indonesia," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(6), pages 423-426, June.
    9. Tarunija Chandra & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2023. "Antecedents and Mediators for Building and Integrated Research Framework towards Successful Brand Revitalisation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 133-163.
    10. Baxter, Stacey M. & Ilicic, Jasmina, 2018. "May the force drag your dynamic logo: The brand work-energy effect," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 509-523.
    11. Emanuela Maria AVRAM, 2019. "Brand Logo Perception In A Globalized Society," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 19, pages 39-46, May.
    12. Fan, Di & Lo, Chris K.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2018. "The impact of corporate label change on long-term labor productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 96-108.
    13. Giese, Joan L. & Malkewitz, Keven & Orth, Ulrich R. & Henderson, Pamela W., 2014. "Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1154-1161.
    14. Gabrielyan, Gnel & Just, David R., 2022. "The Effect of Logo Visibility on Brand Recognition and Willingness to Pay," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322354, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Belboula, Imène & Ackermann, Claire-Lise, 2021. "Consumer response to service brand physical elements: Using a semantic priming task to explore implicit understanding of service brand meaning," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Séraphin, Hugues & Ambaye, Michele & Gowreesunkar, Vanessa & Bonnardel, Valérie, 2016. "A marketing research tool for destination marketing organizations' logo design," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5022-5027.
    17. Guido, Gianluigi & Pichierri, Marco & Nataraajan, Rajan & Pino, Giovanni, 2016. "Animated logos in mobile marketing communications: The roles of logo movement directions and trajectories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6048-6057.
    18. Imène Belboula & Claire-Lise Ackermann, 2021. "Consumer response to service brand physical elements: Using a semantic priming task to explore implicit understanding of service brand meaning," Post-Print hal-03329978, HAL.
    19. Ahmad Daryanto & Nicholas Alexander & Gilang Kartika, 2022. "The anthropomorphic brand logo and its effect on perceived functional performance," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 287-300, May.
    20. Li, Ruiqin & Wang, Yan & Zhang, Hongli, 2023. "The shape of premiumness: Logo Shape's effects on perceived brand premiumness and brand preference," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231219110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.