IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v67y2014i6p1154-1161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength

Author

Listed:
  • Giese, Joan L.
  • Malkewitz, Keven
  • Orth, Ulrich R.
  • Henderson, Pamela W.

Abstract

Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.

Suggested Citation

  • Giese, Joan L. & Malkewitz, Keven & Orth, Ulrich R. & Henderson, Pamela W., 2014. "Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1154-1161.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:67:y:2014:i:6:p:1154-1161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296313002075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doyle, John R. & Bottomley, Paul A., 2004. "Font appropriateness and brand choice," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 873-880, August.
    2. Brigitte Muller & Bruno Kocher & Antoine Crettaz, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Post-Print hal-00772061, HAL.
    3. Bloch, Peter H & Brunel, Frederic F & Arnold, Todd J, 2003. "Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 551-565, March.
    4. Babin, Barry J & Darden, William R & Griffin, Mitch, 1994. "Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(4), pages 644-656, March.
    5. Veryzer, Robert W, Jr & Hutchinson, J Wesley, 1998. "The Influence of Unity and Prototypicality on Aesthetic Responses to New Product Designs," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 374-394, March.
    6. Yong-Soon Kang & Paul M. Herr, 2006. "Beauty and the Beholder: Toward an Integrative Model of Communication Source Effects," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 123-130, June.
    7. Lee, Seunghyun & Ha, Sejin & Widdows, Richard, 2011. "Consumer responses to high-technology products: Product attributes, cognition, and emotions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1195-1200.
    8. Johnson, Eric J & Russo, J Edward, 1984. "Product Familiarity and Learning New Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 11(1), pages 542-550, June.
    9. Leeflang, P.S.H. & Wittink, Dick R., 2000. "Building models for marketing decisions: past, present and future," Research Report 00F20, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Müller, Brigitte & Kocher, Bruno & Crettaz, Antoine, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 82-88.
    11. Campbell, Margaret C & Goodstein, Ronald C, 2001. "The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(3), pages 439-449, December.
    12. Rao, Akshay R & Monroe, Kent B, 1988. "The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 253-264, September.
    13. Jae, Haeran & Viswanathan, Madhubalan, 2012. "Effects of pictorial product-warnings on low-literate consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1674-1682.
    14. Michael Antioco & Rudy Moenaert & Richard Feinberg & Martin Wetzels, 2008. "Integrating service and design : the influences of organizational and communication factors on relative product and service characteristics," Post-Print hal-02312524, HAL.
    15. Janiszewski, Chris & Meyvis, Tom, 2001. "Effects of Brand Logo Complexity, Repetition, and Spacing on Processing Fluency and Judgment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(1), pages 18-32, June.
    16. M. Antioco & R.K. Moenaert & R.A. Feinberg & M.G.M. Wetzels, 2008. "Integrating service and design : the influences of organizational and communication factors on relative product and service characteristics," Post-Print hal-00323008, HAL.
    17. Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne, 1985. "Measuring the Involvement Construct," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 12(3), pages 341-352, December.
    18. repec:dgr:rugsom:00f20 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Tilottama Chowdhury & S. Ratneshwar & Praggyan Mohanty, 2009. "The time-harried shopper: Exploring the differences between maximizers and satisficers," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 155-167, June.
    20. Park, C. Whan & Eisingerich, Andreas B. & Pol, Gratiana & Park, Jason Whan, 2013. "The role of brand logos in firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 180-187.
    21. Brigitte Muller & Bruno Kocher & Antoine Crettaz, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Post-Print hal-01810515, HAL.
    22. Petty, Richard E & Cacioppo, John T & Schumann, David, 1983. "Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 135-146, September.
    23. Alba, Joseph W & Hutchinson, J Wesley, 1987. "Dimensions of Consumer Expertise," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 411-454, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arnold Japutra & Keni Keni & Bang Nguyen, 2016. "What’s in a university logo? Building commitment in higher education," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(2), pages 137-152, March.
    2. Teng, Lefa & Xie, Chenxin & Liu, Tianjiao & Wang, Fan & Foti, Lianne, 2021. "The effects of uppercase vs. lowercase letters on consumers’ perceptions and brand attitudes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 164-175.
    3. Supavich Fone Pengnate & Rathindra Sarathy & Todd J. Arnold, 2021. "The Influence of the Centrality of Visual Website Aesthetics on Online User Responses: Measure Development and Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 435-452, April.
    4. El Amri, Dhouha & Akrout, Houcine, 2020. "Perceived design affordance of new products: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 127-141.
    5. Petit, Olivia & Lunardo, Renaud & Rickard, Bradley, 2020. "Small is beautiful: The role of anticipated food waste in consumers’ avoidance of large packages," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 326-336.
    6. Xiaobing Xu & Rong Chen & Maggie Wenjing Liu, 2017. "The effects of uppercase and lowercase wordmarks on brand perceptions," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 449-460, September.
    7. Byun, Kyung-Ah (Kay) & Jones, Robert Paul & Wooldridge, Barbara Ross, 2018. "It is not always about brand: Design-driven consumers and their self-expression," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 296-303.
    8. Kumar, Minu & Noble, Charles H., 2016. "Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 613-620.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belboula, Imène & Ackermann, Claire-Lise, 2021. "Consumer response to service brand physical elements: Using a semantic priming task to explore implicit understanding of service brand meaning," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Baxter, Stacey M. & Ilicic, Jasmina, 2018. "May the force drag your dynamic logo: The brand work-energy effect," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 509-523.
    3. Imène Belboula & Claire-Lise Ackermann, 2021. "Consumer response to service brand physical elements: Using a semantic priming task to explore implicit understanding of service brand meaning," Post-Print hal-03329978, HAL.
    4. Septianto, Felix & Kwon, Junbum, 2022. "Too cute to be bad? Cute brand logo reduces consumer punishment following brand transgressions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1108-1126.
    5. Gabrielyan, Gnel & Just, David R., 2022. "The Effect of Logo Visibility on Brand Recognition and Willingness to Pay," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322354, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Dangelico, Rosa Maria & Alvino, Letizia & Fraccascia, Luca, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    7. Orth, Ulrich R. & Malkewitz, Keven, 2012. "The Accuracy of Design-based Judgments: A Constructivist Approach," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 421-436.
    8. Tarunija Chandra & Vibhuti Tripathi, 2023. "Antecedents and Mediators for Building and Integrated Research Framework towards Successful Brand Revitalisation," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(1), pages 133-163.
    9. Séraphin, Hugues & Ambaye, Michele & Gowreesunkar, Vanessa & Bonnardel, Valérie, 2016. "A marketing research tool for destination marketing organizations' logo design," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5022-5027.
    10. Alvino, Letizia & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2022. "Investigating the antecedents of consumer behavioral intention for sustainable fashion products: Evidence from a large survey of Italian consumers," Other publications TiSEM ed6b6a75-2a9f-4b6e-8076-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    11. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Uniyal, Dwarika Prasad, 2016. "Impact of Store format on Shopping Involvement," IIMA Working Papers WP2016-06-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    12. Guido, Gianluigi & Pichierri, Marco & Nataraajan, Rajan & Pino, Giovanni, 2016. "Animated logos in mobile marketing communications: The roles of logo movement directions and trajectories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6048-6057.
    13. Sinha, Piyush Kumar & Uniyal, Dwarika Prasad, 2014. "Impact of Store format on Shopping Involvement," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-06, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    14. Ahmad Daryanto & Nicholas Alexander & Gilang Kartika, 2022. "The anthropomorphic brand logo and its effect on perceived functional performance," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 287-300, May.
    15. Teng, Lefa & Xie, Chenxin & Liu, Tianjiao & Wang, Fan & Foti, Lianne, 2021. "The effects of uppercase vs. lowercase letters on consumers’ perceptions and brand attitudes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 164-175.
    16. Carter Morgan & Tatiana M. Fajardo & Claudia Townsend, 2021. "Show it or say it: how brand familiarity influences the effectiveness of image-based versus text-based logos," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 566-583, May.
    17. Živa Kolbl & Maja Konečnik Ruzzier & Tomaž Kolar, 2015. "Brand Revitalization: Don't Let Your Brands Turn into Sleepyheads," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-11.
    18. Ella Ward & Song Yang & Jenni Romaniuk & Virginia Beal, 2020. "Building a unique brand identity: measuring the relative ownership potential of brand identity element types," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 393-407, July.
    19. Mäenpää, Katariina & Kale, Sudhir H. & Kuusela, Hannu & Mesiranta, Nina, 2008. "Consumer perceptions of Internet banking in Finland: The moderating role of familiarity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 266-276.
    20. Ainsworth, Jeremy & Foster, Jamye, 2017. "Comfort in brick and mortar shopping experiences: Examining antecedents and consequences of comfortable retail experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 27-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:67:y:2014:i:6:p:1154-1161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.