IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231203832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability Practices and Financial Profitability: The Case of the World’s Top 20 Crude Palm Oil Producers

Author

Listed:
  • Shahida Shahimi
  • Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M.
  • Hanisah S.F.

Abstract

Sustainability certifications have been introduced for the palm oil industry to ensure its sustainable operation and the production of highly demanded palm oil. At present, there are several sustainability certifications in the market, namely the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO), the Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO), and the Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) certifications. As the crude palm oil (CPO) becomes the largest product been produced and exported in the palm oil industry, it is assumed that the major CPO producers would adhere to the call for sustainability practices by producing certified palm oil. However, the additional cost of acquiring sustainability certification might hinder them from doing so. Besides, it is unclear on the effect of these certifications on firm profitability since there are very few studies have provided quantitative evidence empirical research focuses specifically on the sustainability certification in palm oil industry context. Thus, this intends to fill this gap by examining the effect of local, that is, MSPO or ISPO and international, that is, RSPO certifications on the financial profitability of the world’s top 20 CPO producers which comprises of the leading global palm oil companies based in Malaysia and Indonesia for the period of 2013 to 2018. General Least Regression is employed due to the problems of non-normality of data, heteroscedasticity, and autocorrelation. The main variable under investigation in this study is RSPO, MSPO, and ISPO, proxied by dummy variable. The results showed no significant difference in profitability of locally certified and non-certified CPO producers. Meanwhile, CPO producers with international certification, that is, RSPO recorded reduced profitability of 5% compared to locally certified producers. Hence, the adverse effect of sustainability certifications calls for intervention from both Malaysian and Indonesian governments as well as palm oil authorities in the respective countries, for example, introduction of tax incentives and/or subsidies to compensate for the reduced profitability and the cost of certification.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahida Shahimi & Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M. & Hanisah S.F., 2023. "Sustainability Practices and Financial Profitability: The Case of the World’s Top 20 Crude Palm Oil Producers," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231203832
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231203832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231203832
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231203832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiberio Daddi & Marco Frey & Fabio Iraldo & Bouchra Nabil, 2011. "The implementation of an Environmental Management System in a North-African local public administration: the case of the City Council of Marrakech (Morocco)," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(6), pages 813-832.
    2. Yeong Sheng Tey & Mark Brindal & Suryani Darham & Shaufique Fahmi Ahmad Sidique & Marcel Djama, 2020. "Early mover advantage in Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil certification: a panel evidence of plantation companies," Post-Print hal-02544243, HAL.
    3. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Bala Ramasamy & Darry Ong & Matthew C. H. Yeung, 2005. "Firm Size, Ownership and Performance in the Malaysian Palm Oil Industry," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 1(1), pages 81-104.
    5. Barclay, Michael J & Smith, Clifford W, Jr, 1995. "The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 50(2), pages 609-631, June.
    6. Runa Sarkar, 2008. "Public policy and corporate environmental behaviour: a broader view," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 281-297, September.
    7. Nurul Fathiah Aziz & Norshamliza Chamhuri & Peter J. Batt, 2021. "Barriers and Benefits Arising from the Adoption of Sustainable Certification for Smallholder Oil Palm Producers in Malaysia: A Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Nia Kurniawati Hidayat & Astrid Offermans & Pieter Glasbergen, 2018. "Sustainable palm oil as a public responsibility? On the governance capacity of Indonesian Standard for Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO)," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(1), pages 223-242, March.
    9. Laurence Booth & Varouj Aivazian & Asli Demirguc‐Kunt & Vojislav Maksimovic, 2001. "Capital Structures in Developing Countries," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 87-130, February.
    10. M. Adams & M. Buckle, 2003. "The determinants of corporate financial performance in the Bermuda insurance market," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 133-143.
    11. Shafaai, Shafizal & Masih, Mansur, 2013. "Determinants of cost of equity: The case of Shariah-compliant Malaysian firms," MPRA Paper 62364, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Yaghoob Jafari & Jamal Othman & Peter Witzke & Sufian Jusoh, 2017. "Risks and opportunities from key importers pushing for sustainability: the case of Indonesian palm oil," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Cordula Hinkes, 2020. "Adding (bio)fuel to the fire: discourses on palm oil sustainability in the context of European policy development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7661-7682, December.
    14. Ramachandran Azhagaiah & Raju Deepa, 2012. "Determinants of Profitability of Food Industry in India: A Size-Wise Analysis," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 7(2), pages 111-128.
    15. Esfahbodi, Ali & Zhang, Yufeng & Watson, Glyn, 2016. "Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 350-366.
    16. Pieter Glasbergen, 2011. "Mechanisms of private meta-governance: an analysis of global private governance for sustainable development," International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 189-206.
    17. Noel Capon & John U. Farley & Scott Hoenig, 1990. "Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(10), pages 1143-1159, October.
    18. Tang, Ailie K.Y. & Lai, Kee-hung & Cheng, T.C.E., 2016. "A Multi-research-method approach to studying environmental sustainability in retail operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 394-404.
    19. Myers, Stewart C., 1977. "Determinants of corporate borrowing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 147-175, November.
    20. Sang M. Lee & Yonghwi Noh & Donghyun Choi & Jin Sung Rha, 2017. "Environmental Policy Performances for Sustainable Development: From the Perspective of ISO 14001 Certification," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 108-120, March.
    21. Palmer, Mark & Truong, Yann, 2017. "The Impact of Technological Green New Product Introductions on Firm Profitability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 86-93.
    22. Pfajfar, Gregor & Shoham, Aviv & Małecka, Agnieszka & Zalaznik, Maja, 2022. "Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 46-61.
    23. Shahimi, Shahida & Hafizuddin-Syah, B.A.M & Fuad, Siti Hanisah, 2018. "The Effect of Sustainability Certification for Export on Operational Profitability of Malaysian Palm Oil Companies," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 52(2), pages 55-67.
    24. Asche, Frank & Larsen, Thomas A. & Smith, Martin D. & Sogn-Grundvåg, Geir & Young, James A., 2015. "Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 82-93.
    25. Lakshmy Naidu & Ravichandran Moorthy, 2021. "A Review of Key Sustainability Issues in Malaysian Palm Oil Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Yusuf Amin & Amanat Ali & Bashir Khan, 2019. "Capital Structure of Chinese Firms Across different Sectors: Does Ownership Structure Matter?," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(2), pages 70-82, June.
    2. Harvey, Campbell R. & Lins, Karl V. & Roper, Andrew H., 2004. "The effect of capital structure when expected agency costs are extreme," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 3-30, October.
    3. Caprio, Gerard, Jr & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli, 1998. "The Role of Long-Term Finance: Theory and Evidence," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 13(2), pages 171-189, August.
    4. Gao, Wenlian & Zhu, Feifei, 2015. "Information asymmetry and capital structure around the world," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 131-159.
    5. Wolski, Marcin & Barbiero, Francesca & Popov, Alexander, 2018. "Debt Overhang and Investment Efficiency," CEPR Discussion Papers 12784, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Stephan, Andreas & Talavera, Oleksandr & Tsapin, Andriy, 2011. "Corporate debt maturity choice in emerging financial markets," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 141-151, May.
    7. Ms. Enrica Detragiache & Mr. Gianni De Nicolo & Ms. Senay Agca, 2007. "Financial Reforms, Financial Openness, and Corporate Borrowing: International Evidence," IMF Working Papers 2007/186, International Monetary Fund.
    8. Chen, Minjia & Matousek, Roman, 2020. "Do productive firms get external finance? Evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Bany-Ariffin, A.N. & Mat Nor, Fauzias & McGowan Jr., Carl B., 2010. "Pyramidal structure, firm capital structure exploitation and ultimate owners' dominance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 151-164, June.
    10. Deesomsak, Rataporn & Paudyal, Krishna & Pescetto, Gioia, 2009. "Debt maturity structure and the 1997 Asian financial crisis," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 26-42, February.
    11. G. Oka Warmana & I. Ketut Rahyuda & Ida Bagus Anom Purbawangsa & Ni Luh Gede Sri Artini, 2020. "Investigating Capital Structure Speed of Adjustment (SOA) of Indonesian Companies for Corporate Value," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 21(3), pages 215-231, September.
    12. Doukas, John A. & Pantzalis, Christos, 2003. "Geographic diversification and agency costs of debt of multinational firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 59-92, January.
    13. Charles Andoh & Susana Adobea Yamoah, 2021. "Reinsurance and Financial Performance of Non-life Insurance Companies in Ghana," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 46(2), pages 161-174, May.
    14. Orman, Cüneyt & Bülent, Köksal, 2015. "Structure of Debt Maturity across the Firm Type Spectrum," MPRA Paper 64860, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Demirguc-Kunt, Asl1 & Maksimovic, Vojislav, 1996. "Institutions, financial markets, and firms'choice of debt maturity," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1686, The World Bank.
    16. Kirch, Guilherme & Terra, Paulo Renato Soares, 2012. "Determinants of corporate debt maturity in South America: Do institutional quality and financial development matter?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 980-993.
    17. Hosono, Kaoru, 2003. "Growth opportunities, collateral and debt structure: the case of the Japanese machine manufacturing firms," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 275-297, August.
    18. Chang, Chingfu & Lee, Alice C. & Lee, Cheng F., 2009. "Determinants of capital structure choice: A structural equation modeling approach," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 197-213, May.
    19. Barbiero, Francesca & Popov, Alexander & Wolski, Marcin, 2020. "Debt overhang, global growth opportunities, and investment," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Mário Santos & António Moreira & Elisabete Vieira, 2014. "Ownership concentration, contestability, family firms, and capital structure," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(4), pages 1063-1107, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231203832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.