IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ukm/jlekon/v52y2018i2p55-67.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Sustainability Certification for Export on Operational Profitability of Malaysian Palm Oil Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Shahimi, Shahida

    (Islamic Economics Cluster (EKONIS) and Center for Inclusive and Sustainable Development Faculty of Economics and Management Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor MALAYSIA)

  • Hafizuddin-Syah, B.A.M

    (Risk Management, Insurance and Takaful (RMIT)-UKM and Center of Governance Resilence and Accountability (GRACE) Faculty of Economics and Management Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor MALAYSIA)

  • Fuad, Siti Hanisah

    (Graduate School of Business UKM-Graduate School of Business Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 43600 Bangi, Selangor MALAYSIA)

Abstract

Malaysia is the world’s second largest palm oil producer with 17.4 million tonnes palm oil produced in 2016. The production is for both domestic and export which contribute towards country’s income and economic growth. Despite the significant contribution to the economy, being one of the plantation sectors, Malaysian palm oil has been criticized by the western communities for causing environmental problems such as deforestation and open burning. Hence, it is important for the palm oil companies to ensure sustainable operation and production. The introduction of certified sustainable palm oil (CSPO) or sustainability certification, for instance, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and Malaysian Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO), encourages the sustainable practices by the industry players. Recently, the government had announced the mandatory MSPO-certification in Malaysia by end of 2019. At present, there are only 43.6% Malaysian palm oil companies with at least one certification. The mandatory certification had raised concern among companies on additional costs of adoption which eventually will affect profitability. Moreover, sustainability certifications will only benefit the exporting companies for international market penetration. The question is how important does this certification to the exporting companies as compared to others? This study will analyse the effect of sustainability certification on operational profitability of Malaysian palm oil exporting companies. This study employs generalised least square (GLS) estimation on 17 listed palm oil companies in Bursa Malaysia from 2009 to 2015. The result shows that there is no significant difference in operating profitability due to sustainability certification between the palm oil exporting than the non-exporting companies. The findings indicate that sustainablity practice through RSPO or/and MSPO motivates Malaysian palm oil companies to produce certified palm oil for international and domestic markets, which in line with sustainable development goal (SDG) no. 12 (Ensure Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns) by the United Nations (UN).

Suggested Citation

  • Shahimi, Shahida & Hafizuddin-Syah, B.A.M & Fuad, Siti Hanisah, 2018. "The Effect of Sustainability Certification for Export on Operational Profitability of Malaysian Palm Oil Companies," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 52(2), pages 55-67.
    • Handle: RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:52:y:2018:i:2:p:55-67
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2018-5202-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ukm.my/jem/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/jeko_522-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2018-5202-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashfaq Ahmad & Sadia Bano, 2015. "Working Capital Management Matters Profitability of Textile Sector: With GLS Model," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(11), pages 543-549, November.
    2. Jaafar, Abdul Hamid & Salleh, Norlida & Abdul Manaf, Zulkifli, 2015. "Intersectoral Linkages in Oil Palm Industry between Malaysia and Indonesia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 49(1), pages 25-35.
    3. Lee Xin Ni & Fazlin Ali & Zanurul Huzaima Zainudin, 2016. "Factors Influencing the Implementation of Malaysia Sustainable Palm Oil (MSPO) Among Oil Palm Smallholders in Malaysia," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(12), pages 272-284, December.
    4. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, April.
    5. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Nelson, Harry W. & Vertinsky, Ilan, 2005. "Certification of sustainable forest management practices: a global perspective on why countries certify," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(6), pages 857-867, November.
    6. Laurence Booth & Varouj Aivazian & Asli Demirguc‐Kunt & Vojislav Maksimovic, 2001. "Capital Structures in Developing Countries," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 87-130, February.
    7. Schouten, Greetje & Leroy, Pieter & Glasbergen, Pieter, 2012. "On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The Roundtables on Responsible Soy and Sustainable Palm Oil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 42-50.
    8. Hsiao, Cheng & Hashem Pesaran, M. & Kamil Tahmiscioglu, A., 2002. "Maximum likelihood estimation of fixed effects dynamic panel data models covering short time periods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 107-150, July.
    9. Seema Gupta & P.K. Jain & Surendra S. Yadav, 2011. "Impact of MoU on financial performance of public sector enterprises in India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 263-284, November.
    10. Palmer, Mark & Truong, Yann, 2017. "The Impact of Technological Green New Product Introductions on Firm Profitability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 86-93.
    11. Shafaai, Shafizal & Masih, Mansur, 2013. "Determinants of cost of equity: The case of Shariah-compliant Malaysian firms," MPRA Paper 62364, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Seema Gupta & P.K. Jain & Surendra S. Yadav, 2011. "Impact of MoU on financial performance of public sector enterprises in India," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 263-284, November.
    13. Nawawi, Mohd Nasir & Ali, Jamal & Eam, Lim, 2013. "Pematuhan Industri Pembuatan terhadap Peraturan Alam Sekitar di Utara Semenanjung Malaysia," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 47(2), pages 111-121.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shahida Shahimi & Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M. & Hanisah S.F., 2023. "Sustainability Practices and Financial Profitability: The Case of the World’s Top 20 Crude Palm Oil Producers," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shahida Shahimi & Hafizuddin-Syah B.A.M. & Hanisah S.F., 2023. "Sustainability Practices and Financial Profitability: The Case of the World’s Top 20 Crude Palm Oil Producers," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    2. ElBannan, Mona A., 2017. "Stock market liquidity, family ownership, and capital structure choices in an emerging country," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 201-231.
    3. Byung S. Min, 2018. "Effects of Outsider’s Monitoring on Capital Structure and Corporate Growth Strategy: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 459-475, October.
    4. Musson, Anne & Rousselière, Damien, 2020. "Identifying the impact of crisis on cooperative capital constraint. A short note on French craftsmen cooperatives," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    5. Trinh, Hai Hong & Sharma, Gagan Deep & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Vo, Diem Thi Hong, 2022. "Examining the heterogeneity of financial development in the energy-environment nexus in the era of climate change: Novel evidence around the world," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    6. Ping Yu & Shengjie Hong & Peter C. B. Phillips, 2022. "Panel Threshold Regression with Unobserved Individual-Specific Threshold Effects," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2352, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    7. Haitham A. Al‐Zoubi & Jennifer A. O'Sullivan & Aktham I. Al‐Maghyereh & Brendan J. Lambe, 2023. "Disentangling Sentiment from Cyclicality in Firm Capital Structure," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(2), pages 570-605, June.
    8. Li, Liyao & Yang, Zhenlin, 2021. "Spatial dynamic panel data models with correlated random effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 424-454.
    9. Paul Mizen & Serafeim Tsoukas, 2014. "What promotes greater use of the corporate bond market? A study of the issuance behaviour of firms in Asia," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(1), pages 227-253, January.
    10. Anne Musson & Damien Rousselière, 2020. "Exploring the effect of crisis on cooperatives: a Bayesian performance analysis of French craftsmen cooperatives," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(25), pages 2657-2678, May.
    11. Jifeng Mu & Ellen Thomas & Jiayin Qi & Yong Tan, 2018. "Online group influence and digital product consumption," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 921-947, September.
    12. Faiza Omer Elmahgop, 2024. "Intellectual Capital and Bank Stability in Saudi Arabia: Navigating the Dynamics in a Transforming Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Fritsch, Markus, 2019. "On GMM estimation of linear dynamic panel data models," Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Betriebswirtschaftliche Reihe B-36-19, University of Passau, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    14. Yildirim, Ramazan & Masih, Mansur & Bacha, Obiyathulla Ismath, 2018. "Determinants of capital structure: evidence from Shari'ah compliant and non-compliant firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 198-219.
    15. Jones, Edward & Kwansa, Nana Abena & Li, Hao, 2020. "How does internationalization affect capital raising decisions? Evidence from UK firms," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 57.
    16. Robert F. Phillips, 2014. "Quasi Maximum-Likelihood Estimation Of Dynamic Panel Data Models For Short Time Series," Working Papers 2014-006, The George Washington University, Department of Economics, H. O. Stekler Research Program on Forecasting.
    17. D. Balios & N. Daskalakis & N. Eriotis & D. Vasiliou, 2016. "SMEs capital structure determinants during severe economic crisis: The case of Greece," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1145535-114, December.
    18. Raouf Boucekkine & Rodolphe Desbordes & Paolo Melindi-Ghidi, 2019. "Social Divisiveness and Conflicts: Grievances Matter!," AMSE Working Papers 1906, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    19. Arturas Juodis, 2013. "Cointegration Testing in Panel VAR Models Under Partial Identification and Spatial Dependence," UvA-Econometrics Working Papers 13-08, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Dept. of Econometrics.
    20. Mengyuan Zhou, 2022. "Does the Source of Inheritance Matter in Bequest Attitudes? Evidence from Japan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 867-887, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    CSPO; MSPO; RSPO; SDGs; performance;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ukm:jlekon:v:52:y:2018:i:2:p:55-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Asri Abd Ghani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feukmmy.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.