IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i2p21582440231177298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Class participation and feedback as enablers of student academic performance

Author

Listed:
  • Javier Márquez
  • Laura Lazcano
  • Carmen Bada
  • José Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete

Abstract

In an educational context focused on student learning, class participation and feedback are key to improving students’ performance. Class participation grading methods are often unclear and subjective, therefore, providing feedback on class participation grades is challenging for lecturers. In this study, the Work-In-Class Assessment Tool (WICAT) designed by researchers is a multidimensional system that grades class participation by assessing students’ attendance, active listening, contribution to class activities, and performance in frequent small tasks. The WICAT allows lecturers to clearly and objectively grade class participation while providing students weekly feedback on their in-class performance. This study aims to analyze the effect of the WICAT and weekly feedback on students’ academic performance. The results from an experiment with 699 accounting students over the 2016 to 2019 period showed that students whose class participation grade was obtained through WICAT performed better on the final exam. Furthermore, the results showed that students assessed by WICAT were 2.28 times less likely to fail the final exam. However, the weekly feedback that WICAT allowed did not affect students’ performance. These results have important implications for curriculum designers and teaching staff on how to plan course syllabuses and where to focus in-class efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Javier Márquez & Laura Lazcano & Carmen Bada & José Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete, 2023. "Class participation and feedback as enablers of student academic performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231177298
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231177298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231177298
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231177298?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kate Wynn-Williams & Nicola Beatson & Cameron Anderson, 2016. "The impact of unstructured case studies on surface learners: a study of second-year accounting students," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 272-286, June.
    2. Ratnam Alagiah & Debbie Delaney & Lisa McManus, 2001. "Determining the Relationship Between Attendance and Performance in Accounting Education," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(1), pages 128-138, January.
    3. Sandra Einig, 2013. "Supporting Students' Learning: The Use of Formative Online Assessments," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 425-444, October.
    4. Lei Tang & Shanshan Li & Emma Auden & Elizabeth Dhuey, 2020. "Who benefits from regular class participation?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3-4), pages 243-256, August.
    5. Sally Aisbitt & Alan Sangster, 2005. "Using internet-based on-line assessment: A case study," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 383-394.
    6. Jean Ingersoll Abbott & Barry R. Palatnik, 2018. "Students’ perceptions of their first accounting class: implications for instructors," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 72-93, January.
    7. Astrid Schmulian & Stephen Coetzee, 2011. "Class absenteeism: reasons for non‐attendance and the effect on academic performance," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 178-194, September.
    8. Luckmika Perera & Hoa Nguyen & Kim Watty, 2014. "Formative Feedback through Summative Tutorial-based Assessments: The Relationship to Student Performance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 424-442, October.
    9. Sue Malthus & Carolyn Fowler, 2009. "Perceptions of accounting: a qualitative New Zealand study," Pacific Accounting Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(1), pages 26-47, May.
    10. repec:bla:ausecp:v:41:y:2002:i:3:p:255-66 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Pru Marriott & Lim Keong Teoh, 2012. "Using Screencasts to Enhance Assessment Feedback: Students’ Perceptions and Preferences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 583-598, December.
    12. Kim Watty & Paul de Lange & Rodney Carr & Brendan O'Connell & Bryan Howieson & Ben Jacobsen, 2013. "Accounting Students' Feedback on Feedback in Australian Universities: They're Less Than Impressed," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 467-488, October.
    13. Elena Precourt & Maryella Gainor, 2019. "Factors affecting classroom participation and how participation leads to a better learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 100-118, January.
    14. Johnson, Benny G. & Phillips, Fred & Chase, Linda G., 2009. "An intelligent tutoring system for the accounting cycle: Enhancing textbook homework with artificial intelligence," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 30-39.
    15. Astrid Schmulian & Stephen Coetzee, 2011. "Class absenteeism: reasons for non‐attendance and the effect on academic performance," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 178-194, September.
    16. Mamorena Lucia Matsoso & Chux Gervase Iwu, 2017. "Assessing student performance with the help of tutorials and lectures," International Journal of Education Economics and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 34-45.
    17. Joan R. Rodgers, 2002. "Encouraging Tutorial Attendance at University Did Not Improve Performance," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 255-266, September.
    18. Karlsson, Per & Noela, Massa, 2022. "Beliefs influencing students’ career choices in Sweden and reasons for not choosing the accounting profession," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    19. Jennjou Chen & Tsui-Fang Lin, 2008. "Class Attendance and Exam Performance: A Randomized Experiment," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 213-227, July.
    20. Marriott, Pru & Lau, Alice, 2008. "The use of on-line summative assessment in an undergraduate financial accounting course," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 73-90.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2015. "Accounting education literature review (2013–2014)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 69-127.
    2. Bertheussen, Bernt Arne, 2014. "Power to business professors: Automatic grading of problem-solving tasks in a spreadsheet," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 76-87.
    3. Afrogha, Olufolakemi & Oladele, Femi & Wright, Olatunde, 2020. "Influencing Factors On Academic Performance In Bowen University: The Perceptions Of Accounting Undergraduate Students," International Journal of Contemporary Accounting Issues-IJCAI (formerly International Journal of Accounting & Finance IJAF), The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), vol. 9(2), pages 120-140, September.
    4. Arulampalam, Wiji & Naylor, Robin A. & Smith, Jeremy, 2012. "Am I missing something? The effects of absence from class on student performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 363-375.
    5. Curtis, Susan M., 2011. "Formative assessment in accounting education and some initial evidence on its use for instructional sequencing," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 191-211.
    6. Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2013. "The impact of class absenteeism on undergraduates’ academic performance: evidence from an elite Economics school in Portugal," FEP Working Papers 503, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    7. Litherland, Kate & Carmichael, Patrick & Martínez-García, Agustina, 2013. "Ontology-based e-assessment for accounting: Outcomes of a pilot study and future prospects," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 162-176.
    8. Ellis, Jennifer Butler & Riley, Mark E. & Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe, 2015. "Incorporating face-to-face peer feedback in a group project setting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 317-331.
    9. Stefan Buechele, 2020. "Evaluating the link between attendance and performance in higher education - the role of classroom engagement dimensions," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202010, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    10. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.
    11. Dey, Ishita, 2018. "Class attendance and academic performance: A subgroup analysis," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 29-40.
    12. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    13. Keith Lownie & Fiona A. E. McQuarrie, 2014. "Applying the Principles of Soccer Training to the Design and Delivery of Classes in Introductory Accounting Courses," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 83-98, March.
    14. Hazra, Ummaha & Priyo, Asad Karim Khan, 2022. "Unethical practices in online classes during COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of affordances using routine activity theory," MPRA Paper 117853, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Sheha, Moataz & Mohammadi, Kasra & Powell, Kody, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis of the impact of dynamic electricity prices on solar penetration in a smart grid environment with distributed energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    16. Cuffe, Harold E. & Waddell, Glen R. & Bignell, Wesley, 2014. "Too Busy for School? The Effect of Athletic Participation on Absenteeism," IZA Discussion Papers 8426, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Jennjou Chen & Tsui-Fang Lin, 2020. "Do Cooperative-Based Learning Groups Help Students Learn Microeconomics?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    18. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2013. "Accounting education literature review (2010–2012)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 107-161.
    19. Dobkin, Carlos & Gil, Ricard & Marion, Justin, 2010. "Skipping class in college and exam performance: Evidence from a regression discontinuity classroom experiment," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 566-575, August.
    20. Watty, Kim & McKay, Jade & Ngo, Leanne, 2016. "Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231177298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.