IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joaced/v33y2015i4p317-331.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating face-to-face peer feedback in a group project setting

Author

Listed:
  • Ellis, Jennifer Butler
  • Riley, Mark E.
  • Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe

Abstract

We present a teaching strategy in which students provide fellow group project members with face-to-face feedback on their performance over the course of the project. The first step in the strategy is a classroom session covering important elements of the feedback process. Student groups then meet for two face-to-face feedback sessions; the first session occurs midway through the project and the second session occurs after the group has completed the project. Both sessions provide students the opportunity to deliver and receive feedback. Students who take part in this process gain valuable experience that they can apply throughout their professional careers. While we incorporate this strategy into our Master of Accounting Science program, the ideas and teaching strategies are transferable to upper-division and masters-level accounting courses. The process can also be adapted to settings where less time is available. Our goal is to provide educators with information and ideas that will enable them to implement similar strategies in their own courses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ellis, Jennifer Butler & Riley, Mark E. & Shortridge, Rebecca Toppe, 2015. "Incorporating face-to-face peer feedback in a group project setting," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 317-331.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:317-331
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2015.09.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575115000640
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2015.09.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luckmika Perera & Hoa Nguyen & Kim Watty, 2014. "Formative Feedback through Summative Tutorial-based Assessments: The Relationship to Student Performance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 424-442, October.
    2. Pru Marriott & Lim Keong Teoh, 2012. "Using Screencasts to Enhance Assessment Feedback: Students’ Perceptions and Preferences," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 583-598, December.
    3. Fred Phillips & Susan Wolcott, 2014. "Effects of Interspersed versus Summary Feedback on the Quality of Students' Case Report Revisions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 174-190, April.
    4. Elizabeth Gammie & Morag Matson, 2007. "Group Assessment at Final Degree Level: An Evaluation," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 185-206.
    5. Curtis, Susan M., 2011. "Formative assessment in accounting education and some initial evidence on its use for instructional sequencing," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 191-211.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2016. "Accounting education literature review (2015)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 20-55.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2013. "Accounting education literature review (2010–2012)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 107-161.
    2. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2015. "Accounting education literature review (2013–2014)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 69-127.
    3. Javier Márquez & Laura Lazcano & Carmen Bada & José Luis Arroyo-Barrigüete, 2023. "Class participation and feedback as enablers of student academic performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, May.
    4. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E., 2017. "Analysis of trends in the accounting education literature (1997–2016)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-14.
    5. Grace Ji & Grace Wong & Dennis Taylor & Dessalegn Mihret, 2022. "Motivational appetites, cultural orientations and accounting students' learning," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2283-2312, June.
    6. Evelien Opdecam & Patricia Everaert, 2018. "Seven disagreements about cooperative learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 223-233, May.
    7. Margaret Healy & Maeve McCutcheon & John Doran, 2014. "Student Views on Assessment Activities: Perspectives from their Experience on an Undergraduate Programme," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 467-482, October.
    8. Amy Ehinomen Eremionkhale & Mya Eveland & Shelby Frost & J. Todd Swarthout, 2023. "Online Interactive Pedagogical Tools for the Principles of Microeconomics Curriculum," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 49(1), pages 113-127, January.
    9. Roksana Jahan Tumpa & Samer Skaik & Miriam Ham & Ghulam Chaudhry, 2022. "Authentic Design and Administration of Group-Based Assessments to Improve the Job-Readiness of Project Management Graduates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Margaret Healy & John Doran & Maeve McCutcheon, 2018. "Cooperative learning outcomes from cumulative experiences of group work: differences in student perceptions," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 286-308, May.
    11. Wolcott, Susan K. & Sargent, Matthew J., 2021. "Critical thinking in accounting education: Status and call to action," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Apostolou, Barbara & Hassell, John M. & Rebele, James E. & Watson, Stephanie F., 2010. "Accounting education literature review (2006–2009)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 145-197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joaced:v:33:y:2015:i:4:p:317-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-accounting-education .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.