IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i1p21582440231156367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multidimensional Cyber Defense Exercise: Emphasis on Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Kaie Maennel
  • AgnÄ— BrilingaitÄ—
  • Linas Bukauskas
  • AuÅ¡rius JuozapaviÄ ius
  • Benjamin James Knox
  • Ricardo Gregorio Lugo
  • Olaf Maennel
  • Ginta Majore
  • Stefan Sütterlin

Abstract

Hands-on and practical learning has been key to cybersecurity education and training success. Cyber Defense Exercises (CDX) are a common approach to training, testing, and verifying technical and soft skills. However, full-scale CDX implementation is also an expensive training event. In order to advance such exercises to the next level, CDX organizers should further focus on educational, psychological, and cross-domain relationships. The paper discusses and proposes a multidimensional approach for CDX that balances cognitive, emotional, and social aspects critical for successful interdisciplinary learning. We share our experience incorporating knowledge from well-known psychology theories to CDX. We derive and describe seven elementary ingredients if a CDX is to meet the interdisciplinary and critical thinking needs of defensive cyberspace operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaie Maennel & AgnÄ— BrilingaitÄ— & Linas Bukauskas & AuÅ¡rius JuozapaviÄ ius & Benjamin James Knox & Ricardo Gregorio Lugo & Olaf Maennel & Ginta Majore & Stefan Sütterlin, 2023. "A Multidimensional Cyber Defense Exercise: Emphasis on Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Aspects," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440231156367
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231156367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231156367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231156367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robson, Karen & Plangger, Kirk & Kietzmann, Jan H. & McCarthy, Ian & Pitt, Leyland, 2015. "Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 411-420.
    2. Mullins, Jeffrey K. & Sabherwal, Rajiv, 2020. "Gamification: A cognitive-emotional view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 304-314.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chih-Wei Lin & Chun-Yu Chien & Chi-Pei Ou Yang & Tso-Yen Mao, 2022. "Encouraging Sustainable Consumption through Gamification in a Branded App: A Study on Consumers’ Behavioral Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Bhardwaj, Shikha & Pereira, Vijay & del Giudice, Manlio & Zhang, Justin, 2024. "Examining the failure of gamification in implementing innovation from the perspective of problematization in the retail sectors of emerging economies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Hammedi, Wafa & Leclercq, Thomas & Poncin, Ingrid & Alkire (Née Nasr), Linda, 2021. "Uncovering the dark side of gamification at work: Impacts on engagement and well-being," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 256-269.
    4. Adina Letiţia Negruşa & Valentin Toader & Aurelian Sofică & Mihaela Filofteia Tutunea & Rozalia Veronica Rus, 2015. "Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    5. Armand Faganel & Filip Pačarić & Igor Rižnar, 2024. "The Impact of Gamification on Slovenian Consumers’ Online Shopping," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Andrea Stevenson Thorpe & Stephen Roper, 2019. "The Ethics of Gamification in a Marketing Context," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 597-609, March.
    7. Zhou, Fei & Lin, Youhai & Mou, Jian & Cohen, Jason & Chen, Sihua, 2023. "Understanding the dark side of gamified interactions on short-form video platforms: Through a lens of expectations violations theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    8. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio & Le Pira, Michela, 2018. "Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 119-132.
    9. Sharma, Wamika & Lim, Weng Marc & Kumar, Satish & Verma, Aastha & Kumra, Rajeev, 2024. "Game on! A state-of-the-art overview of doing business with gamification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. B. I. J. M. Van der Heijden & M. J. Burgers & A. M. Kaan & B. F. Lamberts & K. Migchelbrink & R. C. P. M. Van den Ouweland & T. Meijer, 2020. "Gamification in Dutch Businesses: An Explorative Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    11. Mullins, Jeffrey K. & Sabherwal, Rajiv, 2020. "Gamification: A cognitive-emotional view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 304-314.
    12. Leclercq, Thomas & Poncin, Ingrid & Hammedi, Wafa, 2020. "Opening the black box of gameful experience: Implications for gamification process design," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Haziri Fortesa & Chovancová Miloslava & Fetahu Faton, 2019. "Game mechanics and aesthetics differences for tangible and intangible goods provided via social media," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 176-187, June.
    14. Ebers, Axel & Thomsen, Stephan L., 2022. "Evaluating a Gamified Bystander Program: Evidence from Two Randomized Online Field Experiments," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-692, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    15. Hana Dler Ahmed & Gulsum Asiksoy, 2021. "The Effects of Gamified Flipped Learning Method on Student’s Innovation Skills, Self-Efficacy towards Virtual Physics Lab Course and Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Yang, Xiaoping & Yang, Jingshan & Hou, Yilin & Li, Shuyang & Sun, Shiwei, 2023. "Gamification of mobile wallet as an unconventional innovation for promoting Fintech: An fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    17. Víctor Arufe Giráldez & Alberto Sanmiguel-Rodríguez & Oliver Ramos Álvarez & Rubén Navarro-Patón, 2022. "Can Gamification Influence the Academic Performance of Students?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Alfonso D. Gajardo Sánchez & Luis R. Murillo-Zamorano & Joséà ngel López-Sánchez & Carmen Bueno-Muñoz, 2023. "Gamification in Health Care Management: Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    19. Hsi-Peng Lu & Hui-Chen Ho, 2020. "Exploring the Impact of Gamification on Users’ Engagement for Sustainable Development: A Case Study in Brand Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Sophie Renault & Aurore Ingarao, 2018. "Crowdfunding: when fans fund web creators [Crowdfunding : quand les fans rétribuent les créateurs du web]," Post-Print halshs-02190563, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440231156367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.