IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i1p21582440221148620.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More Than Just Numbers: How Engagement Metrics Influence User Intention to Pay for Online Knowledge Products

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Li
  • Pengya Ai
  • Annette Ding

Abstract

The online knowledge-sharing market in China has been rapidly growing, with increasing user demand for paid knowledge products. Like in other e-commerce contexts, users must make product evaluations under conditions of information asymmetry. In the age of social media, engagement metrics can be a particularly rich source of product information for users. However, there has been little research on how engagement metrics influence user decision making in online knowledge market. As such, mainly drawing on the Social Impact Theory, this study conducted a 2 (engagement metrics: high vs. low) × 2 (source expertise: high vs. low) between-subject factorial design experiment to explore the impact of engagement metrics on user purchase intention for online knowledge products. Participants consisted of 151 college students who completed measures on purchase intention, trust, demographics, and other individual variables. Results revealed that only when source expertise is high do higher engagement metrics lead to higher consumer trust, in turn resulting in higher purchase intention. Differentiating from findings on the impact of engagement metrics in other online contexts, this study highlights the importance of source expertise for influencing user purchase intention in the knowledge-sharing market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Li & Pengya Ai & Annette Ding, 2023. "More Than Just Numbers: How Engagement Metrics Influence User Intention to Pay for Online Knowledge Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440221148620
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221148620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221148620
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221148620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer J. Argo & Darren W. Dahl & Rajesh V. Manchanda, 2005. "The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(2), pages 207-212, September.
    2. Liyong Wan & Shoumei Xie & Ai Shu, 2020. "Toward an Understanding of University Students’ Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: When UTAUT Model Meets TTF Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    3. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    4. Kuisma, Tuire & Laukkanen, Tommi & Hiltunen, Mika, 2007. "Mapping the reasons for resistance to Internet banking: A means-end approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 75-85.
    5. Hong, Ilyoo B., 2015. "Understanding the consumer's online merchant selection process: The roles of product involvement, perceived risk, and trust expectation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 322-336.
    6. Marsh, Catherine, 1985. "Back on the Bandwagon: The Effect of Opinion Polls on Public Opinion," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 51-74, January.
    7. Hong, Ilyoo B. & Cha, Hoon S., 2013. "The mediating role of consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 927-939.
    8. S. Shyam Sundar & Silvia Knobloch‐Westerwick & Matthias R. Hastall, 2007. "News cues: Information scent and cognitive heuristics," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(3), pages 366-378, February.
    9. D. Harrison McKnight & Vivek Choudhury & Charles Kacmar, 2002. "Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 334-359, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu-Hsien Liao & Da-Chian Hu & Hui-Ling Liu, 2024. "Influence of Online to Offline on a Chain Store: Two Moderated Mediation Models Investigation," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Friedrich & Sebastian Schlauderer & Sven Overhage, 2021. "Some things are just better rich: how social commerce feature richness affects consumers’ buying intention via social factors," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 159-180, March.
    2. Mohd Suki, Norazah & Mohd Suki, Norbayah, 2017. "Modeling the determinants of consumers' attitudes toward online group buying: Do risks and trusts matters?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 180-188.
    3. Malgorzata Solarz & Jacek Adamek, 2021. "Factors Affecting Mobile Banking Adoption in Poland: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 1018-1046.
    4. Kajol, K. & Singh, Ranjit & Paul, Justin, 2022. "Adoption of digital financial transactions: A review of literature and future research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Uma Thevi Munikrishnan & Kun Huang & Abdullah Al Mamun & Naeem Hayat, 2023. "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Online Food Purchase Intention Among Malaysians," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 28-43, January.
    6. Mohammad Reza Asadi Zarch & Sarasadat Makian & Mohammad Najjarzadeh, 2023. "Multidimensional interdisciplinary variables influencing tourist online purchasing intention at World Heritage City (City of Yazd, Iran)," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    7. Jeeva Venkatakrishnan & Ravikumar Alagiriswamy & Satyanarayana Parayitam, 2024. "Disentangling the relationship between trust, online buying, and customer satisfaction: a three-way interaction model," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 806-828, December.
    8. Ming-Yan Wang & Peng-Zhu Zhang & Cheng-Yang Zhou & Neng-Ye Lai, 2019. "Effect of Emotion, Expectation, and Privacy on Purchase Intention in WeChat Health Product Consumption: The Mediating Role of Trust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Harris, Mark A. & Brookshire, Robert & Chin, Amita Goyal, 2016. "Identifying factors influencing consumers’ intent to install mobile applications," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 441-450.
    10. Tsung-Yu Chou & Peng-Yeh Lee, 2023. "Predicting Athlete Intentions for Using Sports Complexes in the Post-Pandemic Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Pur Purwanto & Kuswandi Kuswandi & Fatmah Fatmah, 2020. "Interactive Applications with Artificial Intelligence: The Role of Trust among Digital Assistant Users," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 64-75.
    12. Phillip Oliver Gottschewski-Meyer & Marvin Auf der Landwehr & Nicole Lüddemann & Christoph Viebahn, 2024. "Trade-offs and synergies of digital choice environments: Towards a taxonomy and configurational model," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Mary Rani Thomas & Kavya .V. & Mary Monica, 2018. "Online Website Cues Influencing the Purchase Intention of Generation Z Mediated by Trust," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 9(1), pages 13-23, January.
    14. Wang, Yihan & Zhong, Ke & Liu, Qihua, 2022. "Let criticism take precedence: Effect of side order on consumer attitudes toward a two-sided online review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 403-419.
    15. Joseph A. Cazier & Benjamin B. M. Shao & Robert D. St. Louis, 2007. "Sharing information and building trust through value congruence," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(5), pages 515-529, November.
    16. Cheng, Junjun & Chen, Bo & Huang, Zihang, 2023. "Collective-based ad transparency in targeted hotel advertising: Consumers’ regulatory focus underlying the crowd safety effect," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    17. Alberto Grillo & Eva Raiber, 2024. "Exit Polls and Voter Turnout in the 2017 French Elections," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 75(2), pages 353-369.
    18. Rosillo-Díaz, Elena & Muñoz-Rosas, Juan Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of heuristic–systematic cues on the purchase intention of the electronic commerce consumer through the perception of product quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    19. Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani & T. Ramayah & Nalini Suppiah & Osama Alfarraj & Nasser Alalwan, 2020. "Modeling Blog Usage From a Developing Country Perspective Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    20. Hwang, ShinYoung & Kim Seongcheol, 2017. "What triggers the use of mIM service provider’s sequel O2O service extensions?," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168494, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:1:p:21582440221148620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.