IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/busper/v11y2023i1p28-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Risk, Trust, and Online Food Purchase Intention Among Malaysians

Author

Listed:
  • Uma Thevi Munikrishnan
  • Kun Huang
  • Abdullah Al Mamun
  • Naeem Hayat

Abstract

The food distribution industry is proliferating significantly and contributing to the economies. The spread of technology enhances the consumption patterns as young and educated consumers are attracted to use the online food purchase systems. This study investigated the perceived risk of consumers and the impact of perceived risks on the purchase intention of the takeaway online ordering model. Google Form was used to obtain the target respondents through various online social media platforms such as WeChat, WhatsApp groups, and Facebook to collect data from Kuala Lumpur and Selangor, Malaysia. A total of 350 valid responses were utilized for partial least square structure equation modeling based data analysis. The study results confirm that financial risk, time risk, and psychological risk can significantly influence the trust in online food sellers. However, time risk, psychological risk, and trust in online sellers can significantly influence the intention to purchase online food. Trust in online significantly mediates the relationship between the associated risk in an online purchase and the intention to purchase online food. The most significant contributor to the intention to purchase food is the trust in online sellers than time risk and psychological risk. Research findings offer practical insights into the process of online food purchases. This study provides practical suggestions, study limitations, and future research opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Uma Thevi Munikrishnan & Kun Huang & Abdullah Al Mamun & Naeem Hayat, 2023. "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Online Food Purchase Intention Among Malaysians," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 11(1), pages 28-43, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:28-43
    DOI: 10.1177/22785337211043968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/22785337211043968
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/22785337211043968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roh, Minjung & Park, Kiwan, 2019. "Adoption of O2O food delivery services in South Korea: The moderating role of moral obligation in meal preparation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 262-273.
    2. Pappas, Nikolaos, 2016. "Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 92-103.
    3. Ramulu Bhukya & Sapna Singh, 2015. "The effect of perceived risk dimensions on purchase intention," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(4), pages 218-230, October.
    4. Hong, Ilyoo B. & Cha, Hoon S., 2013. "The mediating role of consumer trust in an online merchant in predicting purchase intention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 927-939.
    5. Lin Xiao & Bin Fu & Wenlong Liu, 2018. "Understanding consumer repurchase intention on O2O platforms: an integrated model of network externalities and trust transfer theory," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(4), pages 731-756, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu Li & Pengya Ai & Annette Ding, 2023. "More Than Just Numbers: How Engagement Metrics Influence User Intention to Pay for Online Knowledge Products," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440221, January.
    2. Mohammad Reza Asadi Zarch & Sarasadat Makian & Mohammad Najjarzadeh, 2023. "Multidimensional interdisciplinary variables influencing tourist online purchasing intention at World Heritage City (City of Yazd, Iran)," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Cai, Ya-Jun & Lo, Chris K.Y., 2020. "Omni-channel management in the new retailing era: A systematic review and future research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    4. Sunita Guru & Jitendra Nenavani & Vipul Patel & Nityesh Bhatt, 2020. "Ranking of perceived risks in online shopping," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 47(2), pages 137-152, June.
    5. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    6. Bhat Ishfaq Hussain & Singh Sapna, 2018. "Examining the moderating effect of shopping value on private-label and loyalty in Indian grocery stores," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 748-760, March.
    7. Leonie Kuen & Fiona Schürmann & Daniel Westmattelmann & Sophie Hartwig & Shay Tzafrir & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Alrawad, Mahmaod & Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alyatama, Sundus & Al Khattab, Adel & Alsoboa, Sliman S. & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Ramadan, Mujtaba Hashim & Arafa, Hussin Mostafa & Ahmed, Nazar Ali & Alsyouf, , 2023. "Assessing customers perception of online shopping risks: A structural equation modeling–based multigroup analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. repec:aly:journl:201935 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Shahzad, Khuram & Zhang, Qingyu & Zafar, Abaid Ullah & Ashfaq, Muhammad & Rehman, Shafique Ur, 2023. "The role of blockchain-enabled traceability, task technology fit, and user self-efficacy in mobile food delivery applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    11. Zhen-Song Chen & Sheng Wu & Kannan Govindan & Xian-Jia Wang & Kwai-Sang Chin & Luis Martíınez, 2022. "Optimal pricing decision in a multi-channel supply chain with a revenue-sharing contract," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 67-102, November.
    12. Pappas, Nikolaos & Papatheodorou, Andreas, 2017. "Tourism and the refugee crisis in Greece: Perceptions and decision-making of accommodation providers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 31-41.
    13. Konuk, Faruk Anıl, 2020. "Trust transfer from manufacturer to private label brand: The moderating role of grocery store format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Hu Wang & Di Li & Changbin Jiang & Yuxiang Zhang, 2023. "Exploring the Interactive Relationship between Retailers’ Free Shipping Decisions and Manufacturers’ Product Sales in Digital Retailing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-19, August.
    15. Vineet Kaushik & Ashwani Kumar & Himanshu Gupta & Gaurav Dixit, 2022. "Modelling and prioritizing the factors for online apparel return using BWM approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 843-873, September.
    16. Shankar, Amit & Dhir, Amandeep & Talwar, Shalini & Islam, Nazrul & Sharma, Piyush, 2022. "Balancing food waste and sustainability goals in online food delivery: Towards a comprehensive conceptual framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Jae-Jang Yang & Rajesh Iyer & Yong-Ki Lee, 2022. "Why Do Local Foodscapes Matter in Building Tourist Trust and Loyalty?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Ismagilova, Elvira & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Slade, Emma, 2020. "Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    19. Anas A. Salameh & Naeem Hayat & Anis Ali, 2024. "Reconnoitering the Effects of Risk and Knowledge on Use Intention for E-money Services Among Saudi Arabian Residents," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 12(1), pages 133-148, January.
    20. Nahid Malazizi & Habib Alipour & Hossein Olya, 2018. "Risk Perceptions of Airbnb Hosts: Evidence from a Mediterranean Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, April.
    21. Marcello Tedeschi & Giovanna Galli & Maria Cristiana Martini, 2017. "On and Off-line Purchase Intention: the Role of Brand Trust as Moderator of Risk Perception," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 194-203, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:busper:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:28-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.