IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i1p21582440221081132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Middle Managers’ Cognitive Styles, Capacity for Change, and Organizational Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Badri Munir Sukoco
  • Beta Embriyono Adna
  • Zainul Musthofa
  • Reza Ashari Nasution
  • Dwi Ratmawati

Abstract

The last three decades have seen the public sector move from the traditional bureaucratic model to a modern one with better services, efficiency, and accountability. To succeed in making a change, public organizations must develop their capacity for change to improve performance. Middle managers have a central role in the change process, particularly their cognitive styles (knowing, planning, and creating). This study aims to analyze how middle managers’ cognitive style contributes to the organizational performance through organizational capacity for change (OCC). The study was conducted with 75 managers along with 238 subordinates from a public organization in Indonesia. The results revealed that the creating style and organizational performance are mediated by OCC. Only creating styles positively relate to OCC, while knowing and planning styles are not. This study extends prior studies on the link between cognitive style and organizational performance by introducing OCC as the mediator.

Suggested Citation

  • Badri Munir Sukoco & Beta Embriyono Adna & Zainul Musthofa & Reza Ashari Nasution & Dwi Ratmawati, 2022. "Middle Managers’ Cognitive Styles, Capacity for Change, and Organizational Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221081132
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221081132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221081132
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221081132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Ancarani & Francesco Arcidiacono & Carmela Di Mauro & Maria Daniela Giammanco, 2021. "Promoting work engagement in public administrations: the role of middle managers’ leadership," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(8), pages 1234-1263, August.
    2. Asatryan, Zareh & Heinemann, Friedrich & Pitlik, Hans, 2017. "Reforming the public administration: The role of crisis and the power of bureaucracy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 128-143.
    3. Kellermanns, Franz W. & Walter, Jorge & Floyd, Steven W. & Lechner, Christoph & Shaw, John C., 2011. "To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 126-133, February.
    4. David Pick & Stephen T. T. Teo, 2017. "Job satisfaction of public sector middle managers in the process of NPM change," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 705-724, May.
    5. Joris Van der Voet & Ben S. Kuipers & Sandra Groeneveld, 2016. "Implementing Change in Public Organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 842-865, July.
    6. Valasek, Justin, 2018. "Dynamic reform of public institutions: A model of motivated agents and collective reputation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 94-108.
    7. Heckmann, Nadine & Steger, Thomas & Dowling, Michael, 2016. "Organizational capacity for change, change experience, and change project performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 777-784.
    8. Judge, William Q. & Elenkov, Detelin, 2005. "Organizational capacity for change and environmental performance: an empirical assessment of Bulgarian firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(7), pages 893-901, July.
    9. J. P. Eggers & Sarah Kaplan, 2009. "Cognition and Renewal: Comparing CEO and Organizational Effects on Incumbent Adaptation to Technical Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 461-477, April.
    10. Nunzio Angiola & Piervito Bianchi, 2015. "Public Managers' Skills Development for Effective Performance Management: Empirical evidence from Italian local governments," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 517-542, April.
    11. Constance E. Helfat & Margaret A. Peteraf, 2015. "Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 831-850, June.
    12. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498.
    13. Erk P. Piening, 2013. "Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 209-245, February.
    14. Hongxia Peng, 2019. "Organizational ambidexterity in public non-profit organizations: interest and limits," Post-Print hal-01918402, HAL.
    15. Kimberley R. Isett & Sherry A.M. Glied & Michael S. Sparer & Lawrence D. Brown, 2013. "When Change Becomes Transformation," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Véronique Ambrosini & Gulsun Altintas, 2019. "Dynamic Managerial Capabilities," Post-Print hal-03698129, HAL.
    17. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    18. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    19. Mariano L. M. Heyden & Sebastian P. L. Fourné & Bastiaan A. S. Koene & Renate Werkman & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, 2017. "Rethinking ‘Top‐Down’ and ‘Bottom‐Up’ Roles of Top and Middle Managers in Organizational Change: Implications for Employee Support," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(7), pages 961-985, November.
    20. Alessandro Ancarani & Carmela Di Mauro & Maria Daniela Giammanco & Giuseppe Giammanco, 2018. "Work engagement in public hospitals: a social exchange approach," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, January.
    21. William Q. Judge & Thomas J. Douglas, 1998. "Performance Implications of Incorporating Natural Environmental Issues into the Strategic Planning Process: An Empirical Assessment," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 241-262, March.
    22. Graeme Currie & Stephen J. Procter, 2005. "The Antecedents of Middle Managers’ Strategic Contribution: The Case of a Professional Bureaucracy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 1325-1356, November.
    23. Linda Rouleau & Julia Balogun, 2011. "Middle Managers, Strategic Sensemaking, and Discursive Competence," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48, pages 953-983, July.
    24. Linda Rouleau, 2005. "Micro‐Practices of Strategic Sensemaking and Sensegiving: How Middle Managers Interpret and Sell Change Every Day," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 1413-1441, November.
    25. David Lee & Michael McGuire & Jong Ho Kim, 2018. "Collaboration, strategic plans, and government performance: the case of efforts to reduce homelessness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 360-376, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akter, Shahriar & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Sajib, Shahriar & Biswas, Kumar & Bandara, Ruwan J. & Michael, Katina, 2022. "Algorithmic bias in machine learning-based marketing models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 201-216.
    2. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Orr, Kevin & Hughes, Jeffrey, 2023. "My colleagues (do not) think the same: Middle managers’ shared and separate realities in strategy implementation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Tu Thanh Hoai & Nha Nguyen Minh & Hien Vo Van & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Accounting going green: The move toward environmental sustainability in Vietnamese manufacturing firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1928-1941, July.
    4. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    5. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    6. Bağış, Mehmet & Kryeziu, Liridon & Akbaba, Yılmaz & Ramadani, Veland & Karagüzel, Ensar Selman & Krasniqi, Besnik A., 2022. "The micro-foundations of a dynamic technological capability in the automotive industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    8. Dean A. Shepherd & Jeffery S. Mcmullen & William Ocasio, 2017. "Is that an opportunity? An attention model of top managers' opportunity beliefs for strategic action," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 626-644, March.
    9. Huy-Cuong Vo-Thai & Shihmin Lo & My-Linh Tran, 2021. "How Capability Reconfiguration in Coping With External Dynamism Can Shape the Performance of the Vietnamese Enterprises," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    10. Abel Duarte Alonso & Seng K. Kok & Seamus O'Brien, 2019. "Understanding Approaches To Innovation Through The Dynamic Capabilities Lens: A Multi-Country Study Of The Wine Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-30, August.
    11. Sabina Tasheva & Bo Bernhard Nielsen, 0. "The role of global dynamic managerial capability in the pursuit of international strategy and superior performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    12. Betty Feng, Jing & Liu, Steven Y.H. & Anne Liu, Leigh, 2023. "Cognitive antecedents of EMNEs’ dynamic capabilities: A case study of global identity at Lenovo," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    13. Helge Svare & Anne Haugen Gausdal, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities and network benefits," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 117-146.
    14. Shen, Rui & Guo, Hai & Ma, Hongjia, 2023. "How do entrepreneurs' cross-cultural experiences contribute to entrepreneurial ecosystem performance?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    15. Daniel Krause & Madeleine Pullman, 2021. "Fighting to survive: how supply chain managers navigate the emerging legal cannabis industry," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 57(3), pages 50-71, July.
    16. Henk W. Volberda & Nicolai J. Foss & Marjorie A. Lyles, 2010. "PERSPECTIVE---Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 931-951, August.
    17. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2018. "Managing asset orchestration: A processual approach to adapting to dynamic environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 307-317.
    18. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2021. "Strategy implementation: A review and an introductory framework," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 22-33.
    19. Chen, Yantai & Luo, Haibei & Chen, Jin & Guo, Yanlin, 2022. "Building data-driven dynamic capabilities to arrest knowledge hiding: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1138-1154.
    20. Lionel Garreau & Raphaël Maucuer, 2015. "The mise-en-sens tactics of civil society organizations to influence strategy," Post-Print hal-01787991, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:21582440221081132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.