IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241273297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Intuitive-Analytical Cognitive Styles on Entrepreneurial Decision-Making Logic: Moderated by Environmental Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Yalong Wei
  • Dan Long
  • Lihua Fu

Abstract

By neglecting endogenous factors, existing studies that usually focus on examining the effect of exogenous characteristics on entrepreneurial decision-making logic has drawn conflicting conclusions. This paper explores the influences of cognitive styles on entrepreneurial decision-making logic, as well as the moderating role of environmental uncertainty. Using a multiregional sample of 336 Chinese entrepreneurs, the study obtained results by conducting multiple linear regression. Entrepreneurs with an intuitive cognitive style tend to apply causal logic, while those with an analytical cognitive style are inclined to adopt effectual logic. Environmental uncertainty moderates the effect of cognitive styles on some dimensions of entrepreneurial decision-making logic. In an uncertain environment, entrepreneurs with an intuitive cognitive style reduce the use of the logics of affordable loss and leveraging contingencies, while entrepreneurs with an analytical cognitive style reduce the use of the expected return logic. This paper clarifies the relationship between intuitive and analytical cognitive styles, which are always considered to be antithetical. This implies that they always coexist, instead of competing with each other in entrepreneurial decision-making. This finding verifies that entrepreneurial decision-making logic is the result of interactions between cognition and the environment, inspiring scholars to explore it from the combination of multiple elements.

Suggested Citation

  • Yalong Wei & Dan Long & Lihua Fu, 2024. "The Influence of Intuitive-Analytical Cognitive Styles on Entrepreneurial Decision-Making Logic: Moderated by Environmental Uncertainty," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241273297
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241273297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241273297
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241273297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241273297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.