IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i4p2158244020975030.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media Policies Within the Financial Sector in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda van den Berg
  • Miemie Struwig

Abstract

The main purpose of this article is to explore the social media policies of financial institutions in South Africa. Owing to the advances in technology, businesses are exposed to many opportunities but also risks in social media platforms. For the study, a thematic framework was considered to analyze social media policies, which included risk and relationship building, brand image and reputation, stakeholders and communities, disciplinary action and compliance as well as professional and personal guidelines. A qualitative document analysis of social media policies of select South African Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) listed financial institutions was then conducted. For the data analysis, a thematic document analysis using a consensual qualitative research process was applied. The results showed that all the financial institutions appreciated the value and opportunities provided by social media and ensured strict compliance to their social media policies. However, there were some financial institutions that did not focus on relationship building, did not mention brand image and reputation, did not include all stakeholders, and did not suggest personal guidelines in their social media policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda van den Berg & Miemie Struwig, 2020. "Social Media Policies Within the Financial Sector in South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020975030
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020975030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020975030
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020975030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barakat, Ahmed & Ashby, Simon & Fenn, Paul & Bryce, Cormac, 2019. "Operational risk and reputation in financial institutions: Does media tone make a difference?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-24.
    2. O’Connor, Kimberly W. & Schmidt, Gordon B. & Drouin, Michelle, 2016. "Helping workers understand and follow social media policies," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 205-211.
    3. Shirumisha Kwayu & Banita Lal & Mumin Abubakre, 2018. "Enhancing Organisational Competitiveness Via Social Media - a Strategy as Practice Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 439-456, June.
    4. SJ Ferreira & E. Redda & SH Dunga, 2019. "A structural equation model of reputational risk in South Africa," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1625739-162, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Adeabah & Charles Andoh & Simplice Asongu & Albert Gemegah, 2023. "Reputational risks in banks: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods, and future research directions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 321-350, April.
    2. Morana Fudurić & Andreina Mandelli, 2017. "Corporate and Non-Profit Social Media Policies: A Content Analysis," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 7-22.
    3. Đurđana Ozretić Došen, 2017. "Editorial preface," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 29(1), pages 5-6.
    4. John Hamilton, 2020. "The Strategic Change Matrix and Business Sustainability across COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Guastella, Gianni & Mazzarano, Matteo & Pareglio, Stefano & Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2022. "Climate reputation risk and abnormal returns in the stock markets: A focus on large emitters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    6. Zhi Tang & Yang Yu, 2023. "American Economic Stakeholder Sentiments towards Chinese Firms’ Innovation Capability: The Role of State Political Environment and Firm Ownership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Warren Cook & Kristine M. Kuhn, 2021. "Off-Duty Deviance in the Eye of the Beholder: Implications of Moral Foundations Theory in the Age of Social Media," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 605-620, September.
    8. Bizzi, Lorenzo, 2018. "The hidden problem of Facebook and social media at work: What if employees start searching for other jobs?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 23-33.
    9. Kitikorn Dowpiset & Chompu Nuangjamnong, 2021. "An Investigation of Factors Affecting Intention to Comply Thailand PDPA with E-Services in Private University towards Social Media," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 374-393.
    10. Li, Hui & Zeng, Min & Liu, Ya-Fei, 2023. "Secret sentiments make for good announcements: Does unjustified managerial belief benefit tourism firm performance?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    11. Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Gerald Kelly & Marijn Janssen & Nripendra P. Rana & Emma L. Slade & Marc Clement, 2018. "Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 419-423, June.
    12. Hadi Khan & Vatcharapol Sukhotu, 2020. "Influence of media exposure and Corporate Social Responsibility compliance on customer perception: The moderating role of Firm's reputation risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2107-2121, September.
    13. Barbara Del Bosco & Alice Mazzucchelli & Roberto Chierici, 2023. "Firm policies and employees’ participation in conversation about their employer on social media," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2023(3), pages 301-322, September.
    14. Federico Iannacci & Colm Fearon & Kristine Pole, 2021. "From Acceptance to Adaptive Acceptance of Social Media Policy Change: a Set-Theoretic Analysis of B2B SMEs," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 663-680, June.
    15. Bassyouny, Hesham & Abdelfattah, Tarek & Tao, Lei, 2022. "Narrative disclosure tone: A review and areas for future research," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    16. Parker, Janna M. & Marasi, Shelly & James, Kevin W. & Wall, Alison, 2019. "Should employees be “dooced” for a social media post? The role of social media marketing governance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-9.
    17. Ather Akhlaq & Wajaht Ali & Kanwal Gul, 2021. "The Impact of Using Social Networking Sites at Work on Organizational Knowledge," International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management (IJABIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 347-365, July.
    18. Bassyouny, Hesham & Abdelfattah, Tarek & Tao, Lei, 2020. "Beyond narrative disclosure tone: The upper echelons theory perspective," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Chen, Xiayu & Ou, Carol & Davison, Robert, 2022. "Internal or external social media? The effects of work-related and social-related use of social media on improving employee performance," Other publications TiSEM 429334bc-b257-4012-b0a9-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020975030. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.