IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i2p2158244020922876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Response to Perceived Hypocrisy in Corporate Social Responsibility Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Wang Zhigang
  • Zhu Haoming

Abstract

Companies may be confused by consumers’ perceptions of hypocrisy related to corporate social responsibility activities. This study investigates the mechanism of consumer response to perceived hypocrisy and determines that internal attribution and negative emotion play vital roles. The findings may be summarized as follows. First, the consumers’ internal attribution of corporate hypocrisy increases the perceived hypocrisy. Second, the consumers’ internal attribution of corporate hypocrisy also increases their negative emotions. Third, consumers’ perceptions of hypocrisy intensify their negative emotions. Fourth, the negative emotions of consumers negatively influence their attitude toward companies. Finally, consumers’ negative emotions increase their negative behavior. The findings demonstrate that the influence of perceived hypocrisy on consumers’ attitude and behavior is affected by negative emotion. Consumers’ internal attribution of corporate hypocrisy affects their perceptions of hypocrisy, prompting negative emotions. The psychological and behavioral mechanism of consumer response to perceived hypocrisy is discussed, thus contributing to the study of corporate hypocrisy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang Zhigang & Zhu Haoming, 2020. "Consumer Response to Perceived Hypocrisy in Corporate Social Responsibility Activities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020922876
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020922876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020922876
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020922876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Chunyan & Bagozzi, Richard P. & Grønhaug, Kjell, 2019. "The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand advocacy: The role of moral emotions, attitudes, and individual differences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 514-530.
    2. Folkes, Valerie S & Koletsky, Susan & Graham, John L, 1987. "A Field Study of Causal Inferences and Consumer Reaction: The View from the Airport," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(4), pages 534-539, March.
    3. Jay J. Janney & Steve Gove, 2011. "Reputation and Corporate Social Responsibility Aberrations, Trends, and Hypocrisy: Reactions to Firm Choices in the Stock Option Backdating Scandal," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(7), pages 1562-1585, November.
    4. Qamar Farooq & Yunhong Hao & Xuan Liu, 2019. "Understanding corporate social responsibility with cross‐cultural differences: A deeper look at religiosity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 965-971, July.
    5. Evans Asante Boadi & Zheng He & Josephine Bosompem & Joy Say & Eric Kofi Boadi, 2019. "Let the Talk Count: Attributes of Stakeholder Engagement, Trust, Perceive Environmental Protection and CSR," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    6. Thomas P. Lyon & John W. Maxwell, 2008. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment: A Theoretical Perspective," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 2(2), pages 240-260, Summer.
    7. Alexander Chernev & Sean Blair, 2015. "Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1412-1425.
    8. Yves Fassin & Annick Van Rossem & Marc Buelens, 2011. "Small-Business Owner-Managers' Perceptions of Business Ethics and CSR-Related Concepts," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/191947, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Baskentli, Sara & Sen, Sankar & Du, Shuili & Bhattacharya, C.B., 2019. "Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility: The role of CSR domains," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 502-513.
    10. Machleit, Karen A. & Mantel, Susan Powell, 2001. "Emotional response and shopping satisfaction: Moderating effects of shopper attributions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 97-106, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chang, Tai-Wei, 2023. "An indispensable role in promoting the electric vehicle Industry: An empirical test to explore the integration framework of electric vehicle charger and electric vehicle purchase behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. François Maon & Valérie Swaen & Kenneth de Roeck, 2021. "Coporate branding and corporate social responsibility: Toward a multi-stakeholder interpretive perspective," Post-Print hal-03275858, HAL.
    2. Marcinkowska Elzbieta & Sawicka Joanna, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Factor Influencing Purchasing Decisions of Consumers in Central and Eastern Europe," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 281-299.
    3. Ioannis Ioannou & George Kassinis & Giorgos Papagiannakis, 2023. "The Impact of Perceived Greenwashing on Customer Satisfaction and the Contingent Role of Capability Reputation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(2), pages 333-347, June.
    4. Yuan Tian & Chiako Hung & Peter Frumkin, 2020. "An experimental test of the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers' purchasing behavior: The mediation role of trust," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2972-2982, November.
    5. Song, Seobgyu & Park, Kwangsoo, 2023. "Observing disability inclusion in service provision," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Du, Shuili & Xie, Chunyan, 2021. "Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 961-974.
    7. Verena Hüttl-Maack & Doreén Pick & Heribert Gierl, 2019. "Handle with care! How majority cues can reduce the negative effects of warnings of foreseeable product failures," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 689-723, August.
    8. Wei, Yunyi & Sit, Kokho (Jason) & Ekinci, Yuksel, 2024. "Customer definitions of moral value for retail brands: A qualitative understanding," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Rodolfo Vázquez-Casielles & Ana del Río-Lanza & Ana Díaz-Martín, 2007. "Quality of past performance: Impact on consumers’ responses to service failure," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 249-264, December.
    10. Arroyos-Calvera, Danae & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2022. "Reputation as Insurance: How Reputation Moderates Public Backlash Following a Company's Decision to Profiteer," IZA Discussion Papers 15256, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Yu, Weiping & Han, Xiaoyun & Ding, Lei & He, Mingli, 2021. "Organic food corporate image and customer co-developing behavior: The mediating role of consumer trust and purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Sojin Jung & Daeun Chloe Shin & Hongjoo Woo & Byoungho Ellie Jin, 2024. "The spillover effects of positive and negative corporate social responsibility publicity: How and why the effect is lessened versus amplified," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2086-2097, May.
    13. Appel Mahmud & Donghong Ding & Md. Morshadul Hasan, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    14. Qingyu Zhang & Sohail Ahmad, 2021. "Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Execution Effects on Purchase Intention with the Moderating Role of Customer Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Tam Thien Vo & Xinning Xiao & Shuk Ying Ho, 2019. "How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Influence Word of Mouth on Twitter? Evidence from the Airline Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 525-542, June.
    16. Anjum Amin-Chaudhry & Alan Pomering & Lester W. Johnson, 2019. "Incorporating the Concepts of Sharing-In and Sharing-Out in CSR: Australian Consumers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    17. Pankaj C. Patel & C. S. Richard Chan, 2022. "Non-economic Performance of Benefit Corporations: A Variance Decomposition Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 355-376, June.
    18. Yong Liu & Qian Xu & Zhi‐yang Liu, 2020. "A coordination mechanism through value‐added profit distribution in a supply chain considering corporate social responsibility," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 586-598, June.
    19. Matthew J. Hornsey & Cassandra M. Chapman & Heidi Mangan & Stephen Macchia & Nicole Gillespie, 2021. "The Moral Disillusionment Model of Organizational Transgressions: Ethical Transgressions Trigger More Negative Reactions from Consumers When Committed by Nonprofits," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(4), pages 653-671, September.
    20. Heyes, Anthony & Lyon, Thomas P. & Martin, Steve, 2018. "Salience games: Private politics when public attention is limited," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 396-410.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:2:p:2158244020922876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.