IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i2p226-234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability assessment of the spindle systems with a competing risk model

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaojun Yang
  • Xiaoxu Li
  • Chuanhai Chen
  • Hongxun Zhao
  • Dingyu Yang
  • Jinyan Guo
  • Wei Luo

Abstract

Traditional reliability assessment of spindle systems of machine tools suffers from long testing time and high cost. Accelerated life testing is an alternative that overcomes the shortcomings of traditional reliability testing. In a life testing, identification of critical factors of service life and an accurate model are important. Based on the characteristic analysis and engineering experience, four reliability factors, which are the average power of spindle systems, the number of tool changing, the number of spindles restarting and environment temperature, are selected as accelerating environment variables. An accelerated failure time model is used to describe the inverse relationship between the variables and reliability for the catastrophic failure mode and the degradation failure mode separately. Then a competing risk model is built by considering competing risks of two modes. Parametric reliability models are proposed to capture the statistical independency and dependency separately, in which the Gumbel–Hougaard copula function is used to establish the joint cumulative distribution for dependency. Thereby the hypothesis testing is developed to determine the failure modes dependency. The reliability sensitivity of each environment variable is analyzed. Finally, the proposed model is illustrated with a real field case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaojun Yang & Xiaoxu Li & Chuanhai Chen & Hongxun Zhao & Dingyu Yang & Jinyan Guo & Wei Luo, 2019. "Reliability assessment of the spindle systems with a competing risk model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 226-234, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:2:p:226-234
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18770343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18770343
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18770343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luo, Wei & Zhang, Chun-hua & Chen, Xun & Tan, Yuan-yuan, 2015. "Accelerated reliability demonstration under competing failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 75-84.
    2. Bocchetti, D. & Giorgio, M. & Guida, M. & Pulcini, G., 2009. "A competing risk model for the reliability of cylinder liners in marine Diesel engines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1299-1307.
    3. Elsayed, E.A. & Zhang, Hao, 2007. "Design of PH-based accelerated life testing plans under multiple-stress-type," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 286-292.
    4. Nailong Zhang & Qingyu Yang, 2015. "Optimal maintenance planning for repairable multi-component systems subject to dependent competing risks," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 521-532, May.
    5. Anne Barros & Christophe Bérenguer & Antoine Grall, 2006. "A maintenance policy for two-unit parallel systems based on imperfect monitoring information," Post-Print hal-02284315, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qian, Hua-Ming & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2020. "Time-variant reliability analysis for industrial robot RV reducer under multiple failure modes using Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Hashemi, M. & Asadi, M. & Tavangar, M., 2022. "Optimal maintenance strategies for coherent systems: A warranty dependent approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Jiang, Shan & Li, Yan-Fu, 2021. "Dynamic Reliability Assessment of Multi-cracked Structure under Fatigue Loading via Multi-State Physics Model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    4. Wu, Congshan & Zhao, Xian & Qiu, Qingan & Sun, Jinglei, 2021. "Optimal mission abort policy for k-out-of-n: F balanced systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Mi, Jinhua & Lu, Ning & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong & Bai, Libing, 2022. "An evidential network-based hierarchical method for system reliability analysis with common cause failures and mixed uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Lin & Chen, Xiaohui & Khatab, Abdelhakim & An, Youjun, 2022. "Optimizing imperfect preventive maintenance in multi-component repairable systems under s-dependent competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    2. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Peng, Rui & Pan, Zhusheng, 2017. "Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with multiple functional dependence groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 24-33.
    3. Xiaohui Chen & Lin Zhang & Ze Zhang, 2020. "An integrated model for maintenance policies and production scheduling based on immune–culture algorithm," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(5), pages 651-663, October.
    4. Nan Zhang & Mitra Fouladirad & Anne Barros, 2018. "Warranty analysis of a two-component system with type I stochastic dependence," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(3), pages 274-283, June.
    5. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Ahmed Ragab & Soumaya Yacout & Mohamed-Salah Ouali & Hany Osman, 2019. "Prognostics of multiple failure modes in rotating machinery using a pattern-based classifier and cumulative incidence functions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 255-274, January.
    7. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    8. Zhu, Wenjin & Fouladirad, Mitra & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2016. "A multi-level maintenance policy for a multi-component and multifailure mode system with two independent failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 50-63.
    9. Haghighi, Firoozeh, 2014. "Optimal design of accelerated life tests for an extension of the exponential distribution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 251-256.
    10. Fu, Yuqiang & Wang, Jun, 2022. "Optimum periodic maintenance policy of repairable multi-component system with component reallocation and system overhaul," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Kim, Seong-Joon & Mun, Byeong Min & Bae, Suk Joo, 2019. "A cost-driven reliability demonstration plan based on accelerated degradation tests," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 226-239.
    12. Zhang, Nailong & Si, Wujun, 2020. "Deep reinforcement learning for condition-based maintenance planning of multi-component systems under dependent competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Zhang, Lin & Chen, Xiaohui & Khatab, Abdelhakim & An, Youjun & Feng, XiaoNing, 2024. "Joint optimization of selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem for mission-oriented systems operating under s-dependent competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    14. Traore, M. & Chammas, A. & Duviella, E., 2015. "Supervision and prognosis architecture based on dynamical classification method for the predictive maintenance of dynamical evolving systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 120-131.
    15. Almeida, Marco Pollo & Paixão, Rafael S. & Ramos, Pedro L. & Tomazella, Vera & Louzada, Francisco & Ehlers, Ricardo S., 2020. "Bayesian non-parametric frailty model for dependent competing risks in a repairable systems framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    16. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Hamilton, David C. & Smith, B., 2010. "Statistical analysis of competing risks models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 953-962.
    17. Qin, Shuidan & Wang, Bing Xing & Wu, Wenhui & Ma, Chao, 2022. "The prediction intervals of remaining useful life based on constant stress accelerated life test data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 747-755.
    18. Jingyi Liu & Yugang Zhang & Bifeng Song, 2019. "Reliability and maintenance modeling for competing failures with intermission considered," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 898-907, October.
    19. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    20. Huynh, K.T. & Castro, I.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 140-151.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:2:p:226-234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.