IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v126y2014icp87-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric predictive inference for combined competing risks data

Author

Listed:
  • Coolen-Maturi, Tahani
  • Coolen, Frank P.A.

Abstract

The nonparametric predictive inference (NPI) approach for competing risks data has recently been presented, in particular addressing the question due to which of the competing risks the next unit will fail, and also considering the effects of unobserved, re-defined, unknown or removed competing risks. In this paper, we introduce how the NPI approach can be used to deal with situations where units are not all at risk from all competing risks. This may typically occur if one combines information from multiple samples, which can, e.g. be related to further aspects of units that define the samples or groups to which the units belong or to different applications where the circumstances under which the units operate can vary. We study the effect of combining the additional information from these multiple samples, so effectively borrowing information on specific competing risks from other units, on the inferences. Such combination of information can be relevant to competing risks scenarios in a variety of application areas, including engineering and medical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Coolen-Maturi, Tahani & Coolen, Frank P.A., 2014. "Nonparametric predictive inference for combined competing risks data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 87-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:126:y:2014:i:c:p:87-97
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014000088
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.01.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2014. "Nonparametric predictive pairwise comparison with competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-153.
    2. T A Maturi & P Coolen-Schrijner & F P A Coolen, 2010. "Nonparametric predictive inference for competing risks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(1), pages 11-26, March.
    3. Bunea, Cornel & Mazzuchi, Thomas A. & Sarkani, Shahram & Chang, Hai-Chin, 2008. "Application of modern reliability database techniques to military system data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 14-27.
    4. Jiang, R., 2010. "Discrete competing risk model with application to modeling bus-motor failure data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 981-988.
    5. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Hamilton, David C. & Smith, B., 2010. "Statistical analysis of competing risks models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 953-962.
    6. T Coolen-Maturi & F P A Coolen, 2011. "Unobserved, re-defined, unknown or removed failure modes in competing risks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(4), pages 461-474, December.
    7. Bocchetti, D. & Giorgio, M. & Guida, M. & Pulcini, G., 2009. "A competing risk model for the reliability of cylinder liners in marine Diesel engines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1299-1307.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bi Liu & Yunlong Teng & Qi Huang, 2020. "RETRACTED: A novel imprecise reliability prediction method for incomplete lifetime data based on two-parameter Weibull distribution," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(1), pages 208-218, February.
    2. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2014. "Nonparametric predictive pairwise comparison with competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-153.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2014. "Nonparametric predictive pairwise comparison with competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 146-153.
    2. Márcio das Chagas Moura & Enrique López Droguett & Paulo Renato Alves Firmino & Ricardo José Ferreira, 2014. "A competing risk model for dependent and imperfect condition–based preventive and corrective maintenances," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(6), pages 590-605, December.
    3. Fang, Chen & Cui, Lirong, 2021. "Balanced Systems by Considering Multi-state Competing Risks Under Degradation Processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Luo, Wei & Zhang, Chun-hua & Chen, Xun & Tan, Yuan-yuan, 2015. "Accelerated reliability demonstration under competing failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 75-84.
    5. Ebrahimi, Nader & Shehadeh, Mahmoud, 2015. "Assessing the reliability of components with micro- and nano-structures when they are part a multi-scale system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 13-20.
    6. Cui, Lirong & Wu, Bei, 2019. "Extended Phase-type models for multistate competing risk systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1-16.
    7. Kasai, Naoya & Matsuhashi, Shigemi & Sekine, Kazuyoshi, 2013. "Accident occurrence model for the risk analysis of industrialfacilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 71-74.
    8. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Peng, Rui & Pan, Zhusheng, 2017. "Competing failure analysis in phased-mission systems with multiple functional dependence groups," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 24-33.
    9. Liu, Yao & Wang, Yashun & Fan, Zhengwei & Bai, Guanghan & Chen, Xun, 2021. "Reliability modeling and a statistical inference method of accelerated degradation testing with multiple stresses and dependent competing failure processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    10. Wang, Liang & Tripathi, Yogesh Mani & Dey, Sanku & Zhang, Chunfang & Wu, Ke, 2022. "Analysis of dependent left-truncated and right-censored competing risks data with partially observed failure causes," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 285-307.
    11. Ahmed Ragab & Soumaya Yacout & Mohamed-Salah Ouali & Hany Osman, 2019. "Prognostics of multiple failure modes in rotating machinery using a pattern-based classifier and cumulative incidence functions," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 255-274, January.
    12. Kristjanpoller, Fredy & Crespo, Adolfo & Barberá, Luis & Viveros, Pablo, 2017. "Biomethanation plant assessment based on reliability impact on operational effectiveness," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 301-310.
    13. Sarhan, Ammar M. & Hamilton, David C. & Smith, B., 2010. "Statistical analysis of competing risks models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(9), pages 953-962.
    14. Jingyi Liu & Yugang Zhang & Bifeng Song, 2019. "Reliability and maintenance modeling for competing failures with intermission considered," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(5), pages 898-907, October.
    15. Ying Zhou & Liang Wang & Tzong-Ru Tsai & Yogesh Mani Tripathi, 2023. "Estimation of Dependent Competing Risks Model with Baseline Proportional Hazards Models under Minimum Ranked Set Sampling," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-30, March.
    16. Huynh, K.T. & Castro, I.T. & Barros, A. & Bérenguer, C., 2012. "Modeling age-based maintenance strategies with minimal repairs for systems subject to competing failure modes due to degradation and shocks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 140-151.
    17. Man-Ho Ling & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Chenxi Yu & Hon Yiu So, 2021. "Inference for One-Shot Devices with Dependent k -Out-of- M Structured Components under Gamma Frailty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Reliability analysis of multi-trigger binary systems subject to competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 9-17.
    19. Zhaojun Yang & Xiaoxu Li & Chuanhai Chen & Hongxun Zhao & Dingyu Yang & Jinyan Guo & Wei Luo, 2019. "Reliability assessment of the spindle systems with a competing risk model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 226-234, April.
    20. Wu, Di & Yan, Xiangbin & Peng, Rui & Wu, Shaomin, 2020. "Risk-attitude-based defense strategy considering proactive strike, preventive strike and imperfect false targets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:126:y:2014:i:c:p:87-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.