IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v231y2017i4p411-428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Delayed maintenance modelling considering speed restriction for a railway section

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Shang
  • Christophe Bérenguer
  • John Andrews

Abstract

The deterioration of track geometry depends on several factors of which the speed of the train is one. Imposing a speed restriction can slow down the track deterioration and allows a longer survival time before a serious condition is achieved. Preventive maintenance delays can be authorized during the survival time. However, speed restrictions also reduce the system throughput. On the other hand, a longer interval between preventive maintenance activities has a lower maintenance action cost and it also enables grouping the maintenance activities to save set-up costs as well as system downtime. If the repair delay is too long, it may cause unacceptable conditions on the track and lead to higher maintenance costs and accidents. Therefore, it is interesting to assess the effect of a speed restriction on the delayed maintenance strategies for a railway track section. We want to solve a maintenance optimization problem to find the optimal tuning of the maintenance delay time and imposition of a speed restriction. To this aim, a delayed maintenance model is developed, in which track deterioration depends on the train speed and the number of passing trains. The model is used to determine an optimal speed restriction strategy and a preventive repair delay for the optimization of the system benefit and unavailability. Coloured Petri Nets are adopted to model the maintenance and operation of the railway track section. The Coloured Petri Net model describes the gradual track deterioration as a stochastic process. Different speed restriction policies and maintenance delay strategies are modelled and activated by the observed component states. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to estimate the maintenance cost, the system benefit and the system downtime under different policies. Numerical results show the maintenance decision variable trade-off.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Shang & Christophe Bérenguer & John Andrews, 2017. "Delayed maintenance modelling considering speed restriction for a railway section," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(4), pages 411-428, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:4:p:411-428
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17709200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17709200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17709200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrews, John & Prescott, Darren & De Rozières, Florian, 2014. "A stochastic model for railway track asset management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 76-84.
    2. Zio, Enrico & Marella, Marco & Podofillini, Luca, 2007. "Importance measures-based prioritization for improving the performance of multi-state systems: application to the railway industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(10), pages 1303-1314.
    3. Podofillini, Luca & Zio, Enrico & Vatn, Jørn, 2006. "Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 20-35.
    4. Andrade, António Ramos & Teixeira, Paulo Fonseca, 2012. "A Bayesian model to assess rail track geometry degradation through its life-cycle," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 1-8.
    5. Tinga, Tiedo, 2010. "Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1061-1075.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saleh, Ali & Remenyte-Prescott, Rasa & Prescott, Darren & Chiachío, Manuel, 2024. "Intelligent and adaptive asset management model for railway sections using the iPN method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Fecarotti, Claudia & Andrews, John & Pesenti, Raffaele, 2021. "A mathematical programming model to select maintenance strategies in railway networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Macchi, Marco & Garetti, Marco & Centrone, Domenico & Fumagalli, Luca & Piero Pavirani, Gian, 2012. "Maintenance management of railway infrastructures based on reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 71-83.
    5. Ayse Sena Eruguz & Tarkan Tan & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2017. "Optimizing usage and maintenance decisions for k‐out‐of‐n systems of moving assets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 418-434, August.
    6. Baroud, Hiba & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2014. "Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 55-67.
    7. Jiang, R., 2013. "A tradeoff BX life and its applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-6.
    8. Rocco, Claudio M. & Moronta, José & Ramirez-Marquez, José E. & Barker, Kash, 2017. "Effects of multi-state links in network community detection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 46-56.
    9. Jiang, R. & Murthy, D.N.P., 2011. "A study of Weibull shape parameter: Properties and significance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1619-1626.
    10. Poppe, Joeri & Basten, Rob J.I. & Boute, Robert N. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2017. "Numerical study of inventory management under various maintenance policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 262-273.
    11. Nilsson, Jan-Eric & Odolinski, Kristofer, 2020. "When should infrastructure assets be renewed?: the economic impact of cumulative tonnes on railway infrastructure," Papers 2020:4, Research Programme in Transport Economics.
    12. Whitson, John C. & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel, 2009. "Resiliency as a component importance measure in network reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(10), pages 1685-1693.
    13. Tiedo Tinga & Rene Janssen, 2013. "The interplay between deployment and optimal maintenance intervals for complex multi-component systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(3), pages 227-240, June.
    14. Goossens, Adriaan J.M. & Basten, Rob J.I., 2015. "Exploring maintenance policy selection using the Analytic Hierarchy Process; An application for naval ships," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 31-41.
    15. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    16. Dui, Hongyan & Liu, Meng & Song, Jiaying & Wu, Shaomin, 2023. "Importance measure-based resilience management: Review, methodology and perspectives on maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Andrews, John & Fecarotti, Claudia, 2017. "System design and maintenance modelling for safety in extended life operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 95-108.
    18. Darren Prescott & John Andrews, 2013. "A track ballast maintenance and inspection model for a rail network," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(3), pages 251-266, June.
    19. Gedik, Ridvan & Medal, Hugh & Rainwater, Chase & Pohl, Ed A. & Mason, Scott J., 2014. "Vulnerability assessment and re-routing of freight trains under disruptions: A coal supply chain network application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 45-57.
    20. Andrews, John & Tolo, Silvia, 2023. "Dynamic and dependent tree theory (D2T2): A framework for the analysis of fault trees with dependent basic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:4:p:411-428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.