IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v216y2021ics0951832021004518.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A mathematical programming model to select maintenance strategies in railway networks

Author

Listed:
  • Fecarotti, Claudia
  • Andrews, John
  • Pesenti, Raffaele

Abstract

This paper presents a nonlinear integer programming model to support the selection of maintenance strategies to implement on different segments of a railway network. Strategies are selected which collectively minimise the impact of sections’ conditions on service, given network availability and budget constraints. Different metrics related to the network topology, sections’ availability, service frequency, performance requirements and maintenance costs, are combined into a quantitative approach with a holistic view. The main contribution is to provide a simple yet effective modelling approach and solution method which are suitable for large networks and make use of standard solvers. Both an ad hoc heuristic solution and relaxation methods are developed, the latter enabling the quality of the heuristic solution to be estimated. The availability of railway lines is computed by exploiting the analogy with series–parallel networks. By varying the model parameters, a scenario analysis is performed to give insight into the influence of the system parameters on the selection of strategies, thus enabling more informed decisions. For its simple structure, the model is versatile to address similar problems arising in the maintenance of other types of networks, such as road and bridges networks, when deciding on the strategic allocation of maintenance efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Fecarotti, Claudia & Andrews, John & Pesenti, Raffaele, 2021. "A mathematical programming model to select maintenance strategies in railway networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021004518
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021004518
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Petchrompo, Sanyapong & Parlikad, Ajith Kumar, 2019. "A review of asset management literature on multi-asset systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 181-201.
    2. Robin P. Nicolai & Rommert Dekker, 2008. "Optimal Maintenance of Multi-component Systems: A Review," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Complex System Maintenance Handbook, chapter 11, pages 263-286, Springer.
    3. Podofillini, Luca & Zio, Enrico & Vatn, Jørn, 2006. "Risk-informed optimisation of railway tracks inspection and maintenance procedures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 20-35.
    4. Do Van, Phuc & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe & Bouvard, Keomany & Brissaud, Florent, 2013. "Dynamic grouping maintenance with time limited opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 51-59.
    5. Verbert, K. & De Schutter, B. & Babuška, R., 2017. "Timely condition-based maintenance planning for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 310-321.
    6. G Budai & D Huisman & R Dekker, 2006. "Scheduling preventive railway maintenance activities," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(9), pages 1035-1044, September.
    7. Zhu, Qiushi & Peng, Hao & Timmermans, Bas & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2017. "A condition-based maintenance model for a single component in a system with scheduled and unscheduled downs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 365-380.
    8. Van Horenbeek, Adriaan & Pintelon, Liliane, 2013. "A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 39-50.
    9. Liesiö, Juuso & Salo, Ahti & Keisler, Jeffrey M. & Morton, Alec, 2021. "Portfolio decision analysis: Recent developments and future prospects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 811-825.
    10. Olde Keizer, Minou C.A. & Flapper, Simme Douwe P. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2017. "Condition-based maintenance policies for systems with multiple dependent components: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 405-420.
    11. Compare, Michele & Bellani, Luca & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "Optimal allocation of prognostics and health management capabilities to improve the reliability of a power transmission network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 164-180.
    12. Andrews, John & Prescott, Darren & De Rozières, Florian, 2014. "A stochastic model for railway track asset management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 76-84.
    13. Shi, Yue & Xiang, Yisha & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong, 2021. "Joint optimization of budget allocation and maintenance planning of multi-facility transportation infrastructure systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(2), pages 382-393.
    14. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    15. Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai Canh & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-67.
    16. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2015. "Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 83-94.
    17. Charles-Antoine Robelin & Samer M. Madanat, 2008. "Reliability-Based System-Level Optimization of Bridge Maintenance and Replacement Decisions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 508-513, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Zuo & Mengxing Shang & Jianwu Dang, 2022. "Research on the Optimization Model of Railway Emergency Rescue Network Considering Space-Time Accessibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Urbani, Michele & Brunelli, Matteo & Punkka, Antti, 2023. "An approach for bi-objective maintenance scheduling on a networked system with limited resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 101-113.
    2. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Ho, Tinkin & Ran, Xinchen & Mao, Baohua & Lan, Zhen, 2022. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule over variable horizons considering multi-stage degradation and dynamic strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Sedghi, Mahdieh & Kauppila, Osmo & Bergquist, Bjarne & Vanhatalo, Erik & Kulahci, Murat, 2021. "A taxonomy of railway track maintenance planning and scheduling: A review and research trends," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Aizpurua, J.I. & Catterson, V.M. & Papadopoulos, Y. & Chiacchio, F. & D'Urso, D., 2017. "Supporting group maintenance through prognostics-enhanced dynamic dependability prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 171-188.
    5. Barlow, E. & Bedford, T. & Revie, M. & Tan, J. & Walls, L., 2021. "A performance-centred approach to optimising maintenance of complex systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 579-595.
    6. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    7. Do, Phuc & Assaf, Roy & Scarf, Phil & Iung, Benoit, 2019. "Modelling and application of condition-based maintenance for a two-component system with stochastic and economic dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 86-97.
    8. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Jin, Hua & Liu, Shuang, 2021. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule incorporating delay time theory with imperfect maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    9. Liu, Bin & Pandey, Mahesh D. & Wang, Xiaolin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A finite-horizon condition-based maintenance policy for a two-unit system with dependent degradation processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 705-717.
    10. Lu, Biao & Zhou, Xiaojun, 2017. "Opportunistic preventive maintenance scheduling for serial-parallel multistage manufacturing systems with multiple streams of deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 116-127.
    11. Dinh, Duc-Hanh & Do, Phuc & Iung, Benoit, 2022. "Multi-level opportunistic predictive maintenance for multi-component systems with economic dependence and assembly/disassembly impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    12. Dilaver, Halit Metehan & Akçay, Alp & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2023. "Integrated planning of asset-use and dry-docking for a fleet of maritime assets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Do, Phuc & Vu, Hai Canh & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2015. "Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-67.
    14. Nguyen, Kim-Anh & Do, Phuc & Grall, Antoine, 2017. "Joint predictive maintenance and inventory strategy for multi-component systems using Birnbaum’s structural importance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 249-261.
    15. Saleh, Ali & Remenyte-Prescott, Rasa & Prescott, Darren & Chiachío, Manuel, 2024. "Intelligent and adaptive asset management model for railway sections using the iPN method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    16. Zhou, Xiaojun & Ning, Xiaohan, 2021. "Maintenance gravity window based opportunistic maintenance scheduling for multi-unit serial systems with stochastic production waits," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Zhang, Nailong & Si, Wujun, 2020. "Deep reinforcement learning for condition-based maintenance planning of multi-component systems under dependent competing risks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Zhang, Qin & Liu, Yu & Xiahou, Tangfan & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2023. "A heuristic maintenance scheduling framework for a military aircraft fleet under limited maintenance capacities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Do, Phuc & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2020. "Conditional reliability-based importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Andersen, Jesper Fink & Andersen, Anders Reenberg & Kulahci, Murat & Nielsen, Bo Friis, 2022. "A numerical study of Markov decision process algorithms for multi-component replacement problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 898-909.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021004518. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.