IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/padigm/v19y2015i2p170-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Establishing the Relationship between Marketing Specialization and Personality Traits among Management Students

Author

Listed:
  • Tanvi Paras Kothari
  • Sameer Sudhakar Pingle

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to investigate the relationship between personality traits and marketing specialization preferences among management students. Specialization should be selected on the basis of personality types and Holland’s RAISEC framework is an ideal tool for knowing the same. A right match between personality and specialization selection may help an individual for giving his/her best to the profession. The ‘Ten Item Personality Inventory’ method was used to collect responses, along with some demographic information such as gender, work experience and intended major specialization from 200 management students through surveys. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyze the data. The findings reveal that out of five personality traits (Big Five), only the extraversion trait has significant contribution in choosing marketing as a specialization. They also show that gender and work experience do not have a significant impact on students for choosing their management specialization. The research was conducted in one business school and only for marketing, and hence, the results cannot be generalized. The article demonstrates the importance of personality assessment before choosing a management specialization and will be useful for management students aspiring to select ‘Marketing’ as their specialization. It may also help teachers and career counsellors while assisting students during the career selection process.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanvi Paras Kothari & Sameer Sudhakar Pingle, 2015. "Establishing the Relationship between Marketing Specialization and Personality Traits among Management Students," Paradigm, , vol. 19(2), pages 170-183, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:170-183
    DOI: 10.1177/0971890715609856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971890715609856
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971890715609856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magali Beffy & Denis Fougère & Arnaud Maurel, 2012. "Choosing the Field of Study in Postsecondary Education: Do Expected Earnings Matter?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 94(1), pages 334-347, February.
    2. Clifford Oswick & Patrick Barber, 1998. "Personality type and performance in an introductory level accounting course : a research note," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 249-254.
    3. David Roach & Ronald E. McGaughey & James P. Downey, 2011. "Gender within the IT major – a retrospective study of factors that lead students to select an IT major," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 149-165.
    4. Kenneth A. Feldman & John C. Smart & Corinna A. Ethington, 1999. "Major Field and Person-Environment Fit," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(6), pages 642-669, November.
    5. Anne Fortin & Joel H. Amernic, 1994. "A Descriptive Profile of Intermediate Accounting Students," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(S1), pages 21-73, December.
    6. Dennis M. Conley & Douglas Simon, 1993. "Testing for personality bias in evaluating agribusiness students," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(2), pages 119-127.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2003. "Factors explaining the choice of a finance major: the role of students' characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21.
    2. Ismaël Mourifié & Marc Henry & Romuald Méango, 2020. "Sharp Bounds and Testability of a Roy Model of STEM Major Choices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(8), pages 3220-3283.
    3. Fossen, Frank M. & Glocker, Daniela, 2017. "Stated and revealed heterogeneous risk preferences in educational choice," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-25.
    4. Xia, Xiaoyu, 2016. "Forming wage expectations through learning: Evidence from college major choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PA), pages 176-196.
    5. Bicakova, Alena & Jurajda, Štepán, 2014. "The Quiet Revolution and the Family: Gender Composition of Tertiary Education and Early Fertility Patterns," IZA Discussion Papers 7965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Sahoo, Soham & Klasen, Stephan, 2018. "Gender Segregation in Education and Its Implications for Labour Market Outcomes: Evidence from India," IZA Discussion Papers 11660, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Liu, Kai & Salvanes, Kjell G. & Sørensen, Erik Ø., 2016. "Good skills in bad times: Cyclical skill mismatch and the long-term effects of graduating in a recession," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 3-17.
    8. Matthew Wiswall & Basit Zafar, 2018. "Preference for the Workplace, Investment in Human Capital, and Gender," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 457-507.
    9. Hügle, Dominik, 2020. "Higher education funding in Germany: A distributional lifetime perspective," Discussion Papers 2021/1, Free University Berlin, School of Business & Economics.
    10. Bradley, Elizabeth S., 2012. "The Effect of the Business Cycle on Freshman Major Choice," MPRA Paper 42412, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Vivian Liu & Soumya Mishra & Elizabeth M. Kopko, 2021. "Major Decision: The Impact of Major Switching on Academic Outcomes in Community Colleges," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 62(4), pages 498-527, June.
    12. Legge, Stefan & Schmid, Lukas, 2013. "Rankings, Random Successes, and Individual Performance," Economics Working Paper Series 1340, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    13. Erica Blom & Brian C. Cadena & Benjamin J. Keys, 2021. "Investment over the Business Cycle: Insights from College Major Choice," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 39(4), pages 1043-1082.
    14. Matthew Wiswall & Basit Zafar, 2016. "Human Capital Investments and Expectations about Career and Family," NBER Working Papers 22543, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Bicakova, Alena & Jurajda, Štepán, 2016. "Field-of-Study Homogamy," IZA Discussion Papers 9844, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. David N. Margolis & Egidio Luis Miotti, 2021. "Why Do French Engineers Find Stable Jobs Faster than PhDs?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 72(4), pages 555-589.
    17. Haggag, Kareem & Patterson, Richard W. & Pope, Nolan G. & Feudo, Aaron, 2021. "Attribution bias in major decisions: Evidence from the United States Military Academy," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    18. Joseph G. Altonji & Seth D. Zimmerman, 2018. "The Costs of and Net Returns to College Major," NBER Chapters, in: Productivity in Higher Education, pages 133-176, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Lekfuangfu, Warn N. & Odermatt, Reto, 2022. "All I have to do is dream? The role of aspirations in intergenerational mobility and well-being," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Bächli, Mirjam & Tsankova, Teodora, 2020. "Free Movement of Workers and Native Demand for Tertiary Education," Other publications TiSEM 33968781-3521-459e-86c9-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:padigm:v:19:y:2015:i:2:p:170-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.