IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v50y2023i1p7-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing urban biking typologies: Quantifying the complex interactions of bicycle ridership, bicycle network and built environment characteristics

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Beck
  • Meghan Winters
  • Trisalyn Nelson
  • Chris Pettit
  • Simone Z Leao
  • Meead Saberi
  • Jason Thompson
  • Sachith Seneviratne
  • Kerry Nice
  • Mark Stevenson

Abstract

Extensive research has been conducted exploring associations between built environment characteristics and biking. However, these approaches have often lacked the ability to understand the interactions of the built environment, population and bicycle ridership. To overcome these limitations, this study aimed to develop novel urban biking typologies using unsupervised machine learning methods. We conducted a retrospective analysis of travel surveys, bicycle infrastructure and population and land use characteristics in the Greater Melbourne region, Australia. To develop the urban biking typology, we used a k-medoids clustering method. Analyses revealed 5 clusters. We highlight areas with high bicycle network density and a high proportion of trips made by bike (Cluster 1; reflecting 12% of the population of Greater Melbourne, but 57% of all bike trips) and areas with high off-road and on-road bicycle network length, but a low proportion of trips made by bike (Cluster 4, reflecting 23% of the population of Greater Melbourne and 13% of all bike trips). Our novel approach to developing an urban biking typology enabled the exploration of the interaction of bicycle ridership, the bicycle network, population and land use characteristics. Such approaches are important in advancing our understanding of bicycling behaviour, but further research is required to understand the generalisability of these findings to other settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Beck & Meghan Winters & Trisalyn Nelson & Chris Pettit & Simone Z Leao & Meead Saberi & Jason Thompson & Sachith Seneviratne & Kerry Nice & Mark Stevenson, 2023. "Developing urban biking typologies: Quantifying the complex interactions of bicycle ridership, bicycle network and built environment characteristics," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(1), pages 7-23, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:1:p:7-23
    DOI: 10.1177/23998083221100827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/23998083221100827
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/23998083221100827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica Schoner & David Levinson, 2014. "The missing link: bicycle infrastructure networks and ridership in 74 US cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(6), pages 1187-1204, November.
    2. Ralph Buehler & John Pucher, 2012. "Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 409-432, March.
    3. Osama, Ahmed & Sayed, Tarek & Bigazzi, Alexander Y., 2017. "Models for estimating zone-level bike kilometers traveled using bike network, land use, and road facility variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-28.
    4. Cui, Yuchen & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Welch, Timothy F., 2014. "Land use effects on bicycle ridership: a framework for state planning agencies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 220-228.
    5. Tony H. Grubesic & Ran Wei & Alan T. Murray, 2014. "Spatial Clustering Overview and Comparison: Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Computational Expense," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 104(6), pages 1134-1156, November.
    6. John Pucher & Ralph Buehler, 2017. "Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 689-694, November.
    7. Charrad, Malika & Ghazzali, Nadia & Boiteau, Véronique & Niknafs, Azam, 2014. "NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 61(i06).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Ben & Pettit, Christopher & Winters, Meghan & Nelson, Trisalyn & Vu, Hai & Nice, Kerry A & Seneviratne, Sachith & Saberi, Meead, 2021. "Association between network characteristics and bicycle ridership across a large metropolitan region," OSF Preprints 39ke6, Center for Open Science.
    2. Mohamed Bayoumi Kamel & Tarek Sayed, 2021. "The impact of bike network indicators on bike kilometers traveled and bike safety: A network theory approach," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 2055-2072, September.
    3. Arellana, Julián & Saltarín, María & Larrañaga, Ana Margarita & González, Virginia I. & Henao, César Augusto, 2020. "Developing an urban bikeability index for different types of cyclists as a tool to prioritise bicycle infrastructure investments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 310-334.
    4. Médard de Chardon, Cyrille, 2019. "The contradictions of bike-share benefits, purposes and outcomes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 401-419.
    5. Osama, Ahmed & Sayed, Tarek & Bigazzi, Alexander Y., 2017. "Models for estimating zone-level bike kilometers traveled using bike network, land use, and road facility variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 14-28.
    6. Faghih Imani, Ahmadreza & Miller, Eric J. & Saxe, Shoshanna, 2019. "Cycle accessibility and level of traffic stress: A case study of Toronto," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina & Bean, Richard & Corcoran, Jonathan & Pojani, Dorina, 2016. "How does our natural and built environment affect the use of bicycle sharing?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 295-307.
    8. Beck, Ben & Winters, Meghan & Nelson, Trisalyn & Pettit, Christopher & Saberi, Meead & Thompson, Jason & Seneviratne, Sachith & Nice, Kerry A & Zarpelon-Leao, Simone & Stevenson, Mark, 2021. "Developing urban biking typologies: quantifying the complex interactions of bicycle ridership, bicycle network and built environment characteristics," SocArXiv 8w7bg, Center for Open Science.
    9. Shruthi Patil & Leander Kotzur & Detlef Stolten, 2022. "Advanced Spatial and Technological Aggregation Scheme for Energy System Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Mogens Fosgerau & Miroslawa Lukawska & Mads Paulsen & Thomas Kj{ae}r Rasmussen, 2022. "Bikeability and the induced demand for cycling," Papers 2210.02504, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    11. Zhao, Jiahui & Fan, Wei & Zhai, Xuehao, 2020. "Identification of land-use characteristics using bicycle sharing data: A deep learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Colin Ferster & Trisalyn Nelson & Kevin Manaugh & Jeneva Beairsto & Karen Laberee & Meghan Winters, 2023. "Developing a national dataset of bicycle infrastructure for Canada using open data sources," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2543-2559, November.
    13. Castañeda, Paola, 2021. "Cycling case closed? A situated response to Samuel Nello-Deakin's “Environmental determinants of cycling: Not seeing the forest for the trees?”," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Mehzabin Tuli, Farzana & Mitra, Suman & Crews, Mariah B., 2021. "Factors influencing the usage of shared E-scooters in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 164-185.
    15. Alvaro Rodriguez-Valencia & Jose Agustin Vallejo-Borda & German A. Barrero & Hernan Alberto Ortiz-Ramirez, 2022. "Towards an enriched framework of service evaluation for pedestrian and bicyclist infrastructure: acknowledging the power of users’ perceptions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 791-814, June.
    16. Downward, Paul & Rasciute, Simona, 2015. "Assessing the impact of the National Cycle Network and physical activity lifestyle on cycling behaviour in England," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 425-437.
    17. Bolívar, Fernando & Duran, Miguel A. & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2023. "Bank business models, size, and profitability," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    18. Seungwoo Han, 2022. "Spatial stratification and socio-spatial inequalities: the case of Seoul and Busan in South Korea," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Sagaris, Lake, 2018. "Citizen participation for sustainable transport: Lessons for change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 402-410.
    20. Van Holle, Veerle & Van Cauwenberg, Jelle & Deforche, Benedicte & Goubert, Liesbet & Maes, Lea & Nasar, Jack & Van de Weghe, Nico & Salmon, Jo & De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse, 2014. "Environmental invitingness for transport-related cycling in middle-aged adults: A proof of concept study using photographs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 432-446.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:50:y:2023:i:1:p:7-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.