IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v43y2011i12p2992-3010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simulation-Based Study of Geographically Weighted Regression as a Method for Investigating Spatially Varying Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Páez

    (Centre for Spatial Analysis/School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada)

  • Steven Farber

    (The Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA)

  • David Wheeler

    (Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 20892, USA)

Abstract

Large variability and correlations among the coefficients obtained from the method of geographically weighted regression (GWR) have been identified in previous research. This is an issue that poses a serious challenge for the utility of the method as a tool to investigate multivariate relationships. The objectives of this paper are to assess: (1) the ability of GWR to discriminate between a spatially constant processes and one with spatially varying relationships; and (2) to accurately retrieve spatially varying relationships. Extensive numerical experiments are used to investigate situations where the underlying process is stationary and nonstationary, and to assess the degree to which spurious intercoefficient correlations are introduced. Two different implementations of GWR and cross-validation approaches are assessed. Results suggest that judicious application of GWR can be used to discern whether the underlying process is nonstationary. Furthermore, evidence of spurious correlations indicates that caution must be exercised when drawing conclusions regarding spatial relationships retrieved using this approach, particularly when working with small samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Páez & Steven Farber & David Wheeler, 2011. "A Simulation-Based Study of Geographically Weighted Regression as a Method for Investigating Spatially Varying Relationships," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(12), pages 2992-3010, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:12:p:2992-3010
    DOI: 10.1068/a44111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a44111
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a44111?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Wheeler & Catherine Calder, 2007. "An assessment of coefficient accuracy in linear regression models with spatially varying coefficients," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 145-166, June.
    2. Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), 2010. "Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-03647-7, January.
    3. David Wheeler & Lance Waller, 2009. "Comparing spatially varying coefficient models: a case study examining violent crime rates and their relationships to alcohol outlets and illegal drug arrests," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    4. McMillen, Daniel P., 1996. "One Hundred Fifty Years of Land Values in Chicago: A Nonparametric Approach," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 100-124, July.
    5. Kamar Ali & Mark D. Partridge & M. Rose Olfert, 2007. "Can Geographically Weighted Regressions Improve Regional Analysis and Policy Making?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 30(3), pages 300-329, July.
    6. Yee Leung & Chang-Lin Mei & Wen-Xiu Zhang, 2000. "Statistical Tests for Spatial Nonstationarity Based on the Geographically Weighted Regression Model," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(1), pages 9-32, January.
    7. Steven Farber & Antonio Páez, 2007. "A systematic investigation of cross-validation in GWR model estimation: empirical analysis and Monte Carlo simulations," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 371-396, December.
    8. David Wheeler & Michael Tiefelsdorf, 2005. "Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 161-187, June.
    9. Daniel P. McMillen, 2003. "Spatial Autocorrelation Or Model Misspecification?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(2), pages 208-217, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dongwoo Kang & Sandy Dall’erba, 2016. "Exploring the spatially varying innovation capacity of the US counties in the framework of Griliches’ knowledge production function: a mixed GWR approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 125-157, April.
    2. Diana Gutiérrez Posada & Fernando Rubiera Morollón & Ana Viñuela, 2018. "Ageing Places in an Ageing Country: The Local Dynamics of the Elderly Population in Spain," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(3), pages 332-349, July.
    3. Christos Agiakloglou & Cleon Tsimbos & Apostolos Tsimpanos, 2019. "Evidence of spurious results along with spatially autocorrelated errors in the context of geographically weighted regression for two independent SAR(1) processes," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 1613-1631, November.
    4. Wagner, Sebastian & Brandt, Tobias & Neumann, Dirk, 2016. "In free float: Developing Business Analytics support for carsharing providers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PA), pages 4-14.
    5. Rojas, Carolina & Páez, Antonio & Barbosa, Olga & Carrasco, Juan, 2016. "Accessibility to urban green spaces in Chilean cities using adaptive thresholds," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 227-240.
    6. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Taylor M. Oshan, 2016. "Geographically weighted regression and multicollinearity: dispelling the myth," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 303-329, October.
    7. Li, Hengyun & Chen, Jason Li & Li, Gang & Goh, Carey, 2016. "Tourism and regional income inequality: Evidence from China," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 81-99.
    8. Sin Tian Ho, Cynthia & Wilhelmsson, Mats, 2019. "Accessibility of bank branches and new firm formation in Sweden," Working Paper Series 19/8, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
    9. Olaru, Doina & Mulley, Corinne & Smith, Brett & Ma, Liang, 2017. "Policy-led selection of the most appropriate empirical model to estimate hedonic prices in the residential market," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 213-228.
    10. Jane Rongerude & Mônica Haddad, 2016. "Cores and Peripheries: Spatial Analysis of Housing Choice Voucher Distribution in the San Francisco Bay Area Region, 2000--2010," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 417-436, May.
    11. Helbich, Marco & Böcker, Lars & Dijst, Martin, 2014. "Geographic heterogeneity in cycling under various weather conditions: evidence from Greater Rotterdam," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 38-47.
    12. Zizi GOSCHIN, 2018. "Regional patterns of Romanian emigration. A Geographically Weighted Regression Model," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 46(1(55)), pages 60-74, June.
    13. Ingram, Matthew C. & Marchesini da Costa, Marcelo, 2019. "Political geography of violence: Municipal politics and homicide in Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Huang, Yuan & Wang, Xiaoguang & Patton, David, 2018. "Examining spatial relationships between crashes and the built environment: A geographically weighted regression approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 221-233.
    15. Shengfu Yang & Shougeng Hu & Weidong Li & Chuanrong Zhang & José A. Torres, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Effects of Main Impact Factors on Residential Land Price in Major Cities of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:rre:publsh:v:51:y:2021:i:2 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Diana Gutiérrez Posada & Fernando Rubiera Morollón & Ana Viñuela, 2018. "Ageing Places in an Ageing Country: The Local Dynamics of the Elderly Population in Spain," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(3), pages 332-349, July.
    3. Marco Helbich & Wolfgang Brunauer & Eric Vaz & Peter Nijkamp, 2014. "Spatial Heterogeneity in Hedonic House Price Models: The Case of Austria," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(2), pages 390-411, February.
    4. Gollini, Isabella & Lu, Binbin & Charlton, Martin & Brunsdon, Christopher & Harris, Paul, 2015. "GWmodel: An R Package for Exploring Spatial Heterogeneity Using Geographically Weighted Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i17).
    5. Redfearn, Christian L., 2009. "How informative are average effects? Hedonic regression and amenity capitalization in complex urban housing markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 297-306, May.
    6. Christos Agiakloglou & Cleon Tsimbos & Apostolos Tsimpanos, 2019. "Evidence of spurious results along with spatially autocorrelated errors in the context of geographically weighted regression for two independent SAR(1) processes," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 1613-1631, November.
    7. Diana Gutiérrez-Posada & Fernando Rubiera-Morollon & Ana Viñuela, 2017. "Heterogeneity in the Determinants of Population Growth at the Local Level," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(3), pages 211-240, May.
    8. Wrenn, Douglas H. & Sam, Abdoul G., 2014. "Geographically and temporally weighted likelihood regression: Exploring the spatiotemporal determinants of land use change," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 60-74.
    9. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Taylor M. Oshan, 2016. "Geographically weighted regression and multicollinearity: dispelling the myth," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 303-329, October.
    10. Stephen Matthews & Tse-Chuan Yang, 2012. "Mapping the results of local statistics," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 26(6), pages 151-166.
    11. Geniaux, Ghislain & Martinetti, Davide, 2018. "A new method for dealing simultaneously with spatial autocorrelation and spatial heterogeneity in regression models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 74-85.
    12. Cem Ertur & Julie Le Gallo, 2008. "Regional Growth and Convergence: Heterogenous reaction versus interaction in spatial econometric approaches," Working Papers hal-00463274, HAL.
    13. Wenjie Wu, 2012. "Spatial Variations in Amenity Values: New Evidence from Beijing, China," SERC Discussion Papers 0113, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. David C Wheeler, 2009. "Simultaneous Coefficient Penalization and Model Selection in Geographically Weighted Regression: The Geographically Weighted Lasso," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(3), pages 722-742, March.
    15. M. Bárcena & P. Menéndez & M. Palacios & F. Tusell, 2014. "Alleviating the effect of collinearity in geographically weighted regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 441-466, October.
    16. Anping Chen & Marlon Boarnet & Mark Partridge & Wenjie Wu & Guanpeng Dong, 2014. "Valuing The “Green” Amenities In A Spatial Context," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(4), pages 569-585, September.
    17. Cho, Seong-Hoon & Lambert, Dayton M. & Kim, Seung Gyu & Jung, Suhyun, 2009. "Extreme coefficients in Geographically Weighted Regression and their effects on mapping," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49117, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Si-Lian Shen & Chang-Lin Mei & Ying-Jian Zhang, 2011. "Spatially Varying Coefficient Models: Testing for Spatial Heteroscedasticity and Reweighting Estimation of the Coefficients," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(7), pages 1723-1745, July.
    19. Carla Shoff & Tse-Chuan Yang, 2012. "Spatially varying predictors of teenage birth rates among counties in the United States," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 27(14), pages 377-418.
    20. Basile, Roberto & Durbán, María & Mínguez, Román & María Montero, Jose & Mur, Jesús, 2014. "Modeling regional economic dynamics: Spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity and nonlinearities," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 229-245.
    21. Stephen Matthews & Daniel M. Parker, 2013. "Progress in Spatial Demography," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(10), pages 271-312.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:43:y:2011:i:12:p:2992-3010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.