IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envira/v42y2010i11p2560-2580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Geodemographics of Educational Progression and their Implications for Widening Participation in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Alex D Singleton

    (Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, 74 Bedford Street South, Liverpool L69 7ZQ, England)

Abstract

This paper addresses our ability to analyse progression rates into UK Higher Education (HE) using a range of data available at the individual and neighbourhood levels. The then Department for Children, Schools and Families has recently released data which make it possible to profile national patterns of student educational progression from post-compulsory schooling through to university. However, the linked records lack detailed socioeconomic information, and thus a geodemographic classification is used to analyse the flows of students from different sociospatial backgrounds into the HE system. Rates of progression are shown to vary greatly between these groups, and a disaggregation of HE participants by courses of study demonstrates that the abilities of institutions to attract students from different backgrounds will be constrained by the mix of their course offerings.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex D Singleton, 2010. "The Geodemographics of Educational Progression and their Implications for Widening Participation in Higher Education," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(11), pages 2560-2580, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:11:p:2560-2580
    DOI: 10.1068/a42394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/a42394
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/a42394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Hobbs & Anna Vignoles, 2007. "Is Free School Meal Status a Valid Proxy for Socio-Economic Status (in Schools Research)?," CEE Discussion Papers 0084, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.
    2. Peter Batey & Peter Brown, 2007. "The Spatial Targeting of Urban Policy Initiatives: A Geodemographic Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(11), pages 2774-2793, November.
    3. Alexander D. Singleton & Paul A. Longley, 2009. "Creating open source geodemographics: Refining a national classification of census output areas for applications in higher education," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(3), pages 643-666, August.
    4. Derek Leslie, 2003. "Using success to measure quality in British higher education: which subjects attract the best‐qualified students?," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 166(3), pages 329-347, October.
    5. Richard Harris & Ron Johnston & Simon Burgess, 2007. "Neighborhoods, Ethnicity and School Choice: Developing a Statistical Framework for Geodemographic Analysis," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 26(5), pages 553-579, December.
    6. Peter Batey & Peter Brown & Mark Corver, 1999. "Participation in higher education: A geodemographic perspective on the potential for further expansion in student numbers," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 277-303, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. A. Singleton & A. Wilson & O. O’Brien, 2012. "Geodemographics and spatial interaction: an integrated model for higher education," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 223-241, April.
    2. Amanda Otley & Michelle Morris & Andy Newing & Mark Birkin, 2021. "Local and Application-Specific Geodemographics for Data-Led Urban Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Chris Brunsdon & Paul Longley & Alex Singleton & David Ashby, 2011. "Predicting participation in higher education: a comparative evaluation of the performance of geodemographic classifications," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(1), pages 17-30, January.
    4. Richard Harris & Yingyu Feng, 2016. "Putting the geography into geodemographics: Using multilevel modelling to improve neighbourhood targeting – a case study of Asian pupils in London," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(2), pages 93-107, July.
    5. William Clark & Regan Maas, 2012. "Schools, Neighborhoods and Selection: Outcomes Across Metropolitan Los Angeles," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 31(3), pages 339-360, June.
    6. Lehouelleur, Sophie & Beblavý, Miroslav & Maselli,Ilaria, 2015. "How returns from tertiary education differ by field of study: Implications for policy-makers and students," CEPS Papers 10835, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    7. O'Leary, Nigel C. & Sloane, Peter J., 2005. "The Return to a University Education in Great Britain," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 193, pages 75-89, July.
    8. Silver, Daniel & Silva, Thiago H, 2020. "A Markov model of urban evolution: Neighbourhood change as a complex process," SocArXiv v3ua9, Center for Open Science.
    9. Stephen Hincks, 2015. "Neighbourhood Change and Deprivation in the Greater Manchester City-Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 47(2), pages 430-449, February.
    10. Andersson, Eva & Malmberg, Bo & Östh, John, 2012. "Travel-to-school distances in Sweden 2000–2006: changing school geography with equality implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 35-43.
    11. Eva K Andersson & Pontus Hennerdal & Bo Malmberg, 2021. "The re-emergence of educational inequality during a period of reforms: A study of Swedish school leavers 1991–2012," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(4), pages 685-705, May.
    12. Cheti Nicoletti & Birgitta Rabe, 2019. "Sibling spillover effects in school achievement," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 482-501, June.
    13. D Leslie, 2004. "Does UK Higher Education Discriminate Against Women?," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 9(2), pages 51-68, September.
    14. Gibbons, Stephen & Machin, Stephen & Silva, Olmo, 2013. "Valuing school quality using boundary discontinuities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 15-28.
    15. Levi J Wolf & Elijah Knaap & Sergio Rey, 2021. "Geosilhouettes: Geographical measures of cluster fit," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 521-539, March.
    16. Massimiliano Bratti, 2005. "Social Class and Undergraduate Degree Subject in the UK," UNIMI - Research Papers in Economics, Business, and Statistics unimi-1015, Universitá degli Studi di Milano.
    17. Giuseppe Bruno & Manuel Cavola & Antonio Diglio & Carmela Piccolo, 2022. "Geographical accessibility to upper secondary education: an Italian regional case study," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 511-536, October.
    18. Weinhardt, Felix, 2014. "Social housing, neighborhood quality and student performance," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 12-31.
    19. Kingdon, Geeta & Cassen, Robert, 2007. "Understanding low achievement in English schools," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6222, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Haroon Chowdry & Claire Crawford & Lorraine Dearden & Alissa Goodman & Anna Vignoles, 2013. "Widening participation in higher education: analysis using linked administrative data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(2), pages 431-457, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envira:v:42:y:2010:i:11:p:2560-2580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.