IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rsr/supplm/v65y2017i4p66-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural Methods Used In Forecasting Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Florin Paul Costel LILEA

    („Artifex” University of Bucharest)

  • Aurelian DIACONU

    („Artifex” University of Bucharest)

  • Radu Titus MARINESCU

    („Artifex” University of Bucharest)

  • Gyorgy BODO

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

In this article, the authors have proposed to analyze some structural prediction methods that can be used in macroeconomic studies. In this sense, the authors focused particularly on analysis of how, economic and mathematical model can be used in the economic forecast. I started with the general model of the Cobb-Douglas, which is a function of the production factors is based on the consideration included in the mathematical model, thus identifying the influence that each of those factors. The Cobb-Douglas model is a synthesis of the forecast, the forecast model is easily associated with the way of simulation or analysis to consider the possibility on the basis of factors identified in the preliminary study. The paper provides a number of elements which can be reached from a study of prognosis, to carry out its functions for the purposes of ensuring an optimal forecasting and projecting levels and indicators that can straighten out economic trends into the future. The system of economic indicators, is considered to be comprehensive, can provide both a clear vision and identification is possible for future work. In this article, the authors refer to the method successive approximations method tree of possibilities, the scenario method or the method of international comparisons. These and production functions enable analysis based on structural models to ensure finally a certain element on the future evolution of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Florin Paul Costel LILEA & Aurelian DIACONU & Radu Titus MARINESCU & Gyorgy BODO, 2017. "Structural Methods Used In Forecasting Studies," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(4), pages 66-74, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:4:p:66-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistadestatistica.ro/supliment/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/rrss_04_2017_site_A04_en.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Janusz GRABARA & Alexandru MANOLE, 2016. "Using the Dynamic Model ARMA to Forecast the Macroeconomic Evolution," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 3-13, January.
    2. Olivier J. Blanchard & Daniel Leigh, 2013. "Growth Forecast Errors and Fiscal Multipliers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(3), pages 117-120, May.
    3. Refet Gürkaynak & Justin Wolfers, 2005. "Macroeconomic Derivatives: An Initial Analysis of Market-Based Macro Forecasts, Uncertainty, and Risk," NBER Chapters, in: NBER International Seminar on Macroeconomics 2005, pages 11-50, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Mirela PANAIT & Andreea - Ioana MARINESCU & Georgiana NITA, 2017. "Models and indicators used in macroeconomic forecast," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(3), pages 40-48, March.
    5. S. Boragan Aruoba & Francis X. Diebold, 2010. "Real-Time Macroeconomic Monitoring: Real Activity, Inflation, and Interactions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(2), pages 20-24, May.
    6. Oller, Lars-Erik & Teterukovsky, Alex, 2007. "Quantifying the quality of macroeconomic variables," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 205-217.
    7. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Ioan Constantin DIMA & Mãdãlina-Gabriela ANGHEL, 2016. "Using the Autoregressive Model for the Economic Forecast during the Period 2014- 2018," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 21-31, January.
    8. Catherine C. Eckel & Philip J. Grossman, 2008. "Forecasting Risk Attitudes: An Experimental Study Using Actual and Forecast Gamble Choices," Monash Economics Working Papers archive-01, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    9. Wilms, Ines & Croux, Christophe, 2016. "Forecasting using sparse cointegration," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 1256-1267.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Tudor SAMSON & Radu STOICA, 2017. "Methods And Techniques For Preparing Forecasts," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(4), pages 26-36, April.
    2. Florin Paul Costel LILEA & Andreea – Ioana MARINESCU, 2017. "Macroeconomic Forecast Models – Concepts And Theoretical Notions," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(6), pages 118-123, June.
    3. Constantin Anghelache & Madalina-Gabriela Anghel & Alina-Georgiana Solomon, 2017. "National Accounts System: Source of Information in Macroeconomic Forecast," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 76-82, April.
    4. Florin Paul Costel LILEA & Alexandru MANOLE & Maria MIREA & Andreea - Ioana MARINESCU, 2017. "Models Of Development Of Labour Productivity Forecast," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(4), pages 107-114, April.
    5. Madalina-Gabriela Anghel & Alexandru Manole & Alina-Georgiana Solomon, 2017. "Using the System of National Accounts in the Forecasting Activity," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 91-96, April.
    6. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Gyorgy BODO, 2017. "Theoretical Aspects Of The Role Of Information In The Process Of Decisions/Risks Modeling," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(6), pages 102-111, June.
    7. Madalina-Gabriela ANGHEL & Constantin ANGHELACHE & Georgiana NITA & Tudor SAMSON, 2017. "Human Resource Forecasting Models," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 65(4), pages 87-98, April.
    8. Ms. Ghada Fayad & Mr. Roberto Perrelli, 2014. "Growth Surprises and Synchronized Slowdowns in Emerging Markets––An Empirical Investigation," IMF Working Papers 2014/173, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Kerri Brick & Martine Visser & Justine Burns, 2012. "Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 133-152.
    10. Achim Truger, 2015. "Implementing the golden rule for public investment in Europe," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 138, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    11. Kawecka-Wyrzykowska Elżbieta, 2013. "Enhanced Economic Governance in the EU: Alternative to a Political Union?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 37(1), pages 10-35, March.
    12. Heilemann, Ullrich & Stekler, Herman, 2007. "Introduction to "The future of macroeconomic forecasting"," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 159-165.
    13. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5a5m6mrpgl8dlbhfjigc98ug8o is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Ricardo Félix & Gabriela Castro & José Maria & Paulo Júlio, 2013. "Fiscal Multipliers in a Small Euro Area Economy: How Big Can They Get in Crisis Times?," EcoMod2013 5307, EcoMod.
    15. Raziiakhan Abdieva & Burulcha Sulaimanova & Kamalbek Karymshakov, 2019. "Gender differences, risk attitude and entrepreneurship in Kyrgyzstan," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 17-30.
    16. Cyrille Lenoël & Corrado Macchiarelli & Garry Young, 2022. "Greece 2010-18: What could we have done differently?," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 172, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    17. Søren Ravn & Morten Spange, 2014. "The Effects of Fiscal Policy in a Small Open Economy with a Fixed Exchange Rate," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 451-476, July.
    18. Valerie A. Ramey, 2019. "Ten Years after the Financial Crisis: What Have We Learned from the Renaissance in Fiscal Research?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 89-114, Spring.
    19. Gagnon, Marie-Hélène & Gimet, Céline, 2013. "The impacts of standard monetary and budgetary policies on liquidity and financial markets: International evidence from the credit freeze crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4599-4614.
    20. Zubanov, Nick & Cadsby, Bram & Song, Fei, 2017. "The," IZA Discussion Papers 10542, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    21. Chetan Dave & Catherine Eckel & Cathleen Johnson & Christian Rojas, 2010. "Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 219-243, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rsr:supplm:v:65:y:2017:i:4:p:66-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adrian Visoiu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.