IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/terumm/v13y2018i1p5-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Community Engagement Through Crowdsourcing: Case Study On Participatory Budgeting

Author

Listed:
  • Barbora HALTOFOVA

    (Tomas Bata University in Zlin, nAm. T. G. Masaryka 5555, 760 01 Zlin, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Crowdsourcing in urban governments is defined as the use of new technologies in order to take advantage of citizen knowledge to find solutions to municipal problems. Driven by the constant technological advances and ubiquitous Internet connection, the crowdsourcing platforms are proving to be valuable tools for triggering and engaging the public towards active participation. In this article, we present the emerging role of crowdsourcing in urban administration and illustrate an example of a case study on how crowdsourcing fosters citizen engagement. The case study shows that crowdsourcing leads not only to deeper civic engagement but also to better public decisions

Suggested Citation

  • Barbora HALTOFOVA, 2018. "Fostering Community Engagement Through Crowdsourcing: Case Study On Participatory Budgeting," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(1), pages 5-12, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:5-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://um.ase.ro/no131/1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin C. Desouza & Akshay Bhagwatwar, 2014. "Technology-Enabled Participatory Platforms for Civic Engagement: The Case of U.S. Cities," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 25-50, October.
    2. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2012. "Urban Planning 2.0," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 16-30, January.
    3. Maria Isabel Brun-Martos & Irvine Lapsley, 2017. "Democracy, governmentality and transparency: participatory budgeting in action," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 1006-1021, August.
    4. Eliza Lee & Ian Thynne & Baogang He, 2011. "Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(2), pages 122-133, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tan Yigitcanlar & Kevin C. Desouza & Luke Butler & Farnoosh Roozkhosh, 2020. "Contributions and Risks of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Building Smarter Cities: Insights from a Systematic Review of the Literature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-38, March.
    2. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    3. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    4. Suhartono Suhartono & Roy Valiant Salomo & Umanto Eko Prasetyo, 2022. "The Alignment Challenges of Development Planning and Budgeting: Insights from Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 54-83, August.
    5. Francesco Pinna & Francesca Masala & Chiara Garau, 2017. "Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Leśniewska-Napierała Katarzyna & Napierała Tomasz, 2020. "Participatory budgeting: creator or creation of a better place? Evidence from rural Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 48(48), pages 65-81, June.
    7. Sergiu Gherghina & Paul Tap, 2021. "Ecology Projects and Participatory Budgeting: Enhancing Citizens’ Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    8. Zhang, Eagle, 2024. "Accounting and statecraft in China: Accrual accounting for effective government rather than efficient market," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. Bąkowska-Waldmann Edyta & Brudka Cezary & Jankowski Piotr, 2018. "Legal and Organizational Framework for the use of Geoweb Methods for Public Participation in Spatial Planning in Poland: Experiences, Opinions and Challenges," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 37(3), pages 163-175, September.
    10. Gil, Olga, 2019. "Public participation in China and the West," SocArXiv dapvj, Center for Open Science.
    11. Barbara Ester Adele Piga & Gabriele Stancato & Nicola Rainisio & Marco Boffi, 2021. "How Do Nature-Based Solutions’ Color Tones Influence People’s Emotional Reaction? An Assessment via Virtual and Augmented Reality in a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Soud K. Al-Thani & Cynthia P. Skelhorn & Alexandre Amato & Muammer Koc & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2018. "Smart Technology Impact on Neighborhood Form for a Sustainable Doha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Meng, Tianguang & Su, Zheng, 2021. "When top-down meets bottom-up: Local officials and selective responsiveness within fiscal policymaking in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    14. Rasel Mpuya Madaha, 2020. "Can Local African Communities be Empowered through Participatory Budgeting?," International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(2), pages 74-93, June.
    15. Ganesh Prasad Pandeya & Shree Krishna Shrestha, 2016. "Does Citizen Participation Improve Local Planning? An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholders’ Perceptions in Nepal," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 11(3), pages 276-304, December.
    16. Falco, Enzo & Kleinhans, Reinout, 2018. "Beyond technology: Identifying local government challenges for using digital platforms for citizen engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 17-20.
    17. Wei Tang & Tiancai Zhou & Jian Sun & Yurui Li & Weipeng Li, 2017. "Accelerated Urban Expansion in Lhasa City and the Implications for Sustainable Development in a Plateau City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    18. Pazzi, Silvia & Svetlova, Ekaterina, 2023. "NGOs, public accountability, and critical accounting education: Making data speak," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Emilie Frenkiel & Stéphanie Tawa Lama-Rewal, 2019. "The Redistribution of Representation through Participation: Participatory Budgeting in Chengdu and Delhi," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 112-123.
    20. Weizeng Sun & Siqi Zheng & Yuming Fu, 2016. "Local Public Service Provision and Spatial Inequality in Chinese Cities," ERSA conference papers ersa16p799, European Regional Science Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:terumm:v:13:y:2018:i:1:p:5-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Colesca Sofia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ccasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.