IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/dapvj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public participation in China and the West

Author

Listed:
  • Gil, Olga

Abstract

This work shows differences in public participation in China and Western countries, conceptually and empirically. To do so, the different philosophical and public administration traditions are outlined. Main contributions are tables and dashboards that allow for general comparisons and to differentiate contexts in both political settings, and are useful for other settings. The tables included are: 1) Main features of context in China, 2) Deliberative democracy, 3) Main features of context in the west, 4) The Gil Dashboard, helping to outline the endogenous foundations for change both in China and the West.

Suggested Citation

  • Gil, Olga, 2019. "Public participation in China and the West," SocArXiv dapvj, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:dapvj
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dapvj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6385e9bf723a111cba18c98f/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/dapvj?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lin, Yanliu, 2018. "A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 800-809.
    2. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2016. "The Reality and Diversity of Buddhist Economics (With Case Studies of Thailand, Bhutan and Yogyakarta)," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 69, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    3. Olga Gil & María E. Cortés-Cediel & Iván Cantador, 2019. "Citizen Participation and the Rise of Digital Media Platforms in Smart Governance and Smart Cities," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 8(1), pages 19-34, January.
    4. Wolfgang Drechsler, 2019. "The Reality and Diversity of Buddhist Economics," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(2), pages 523-560, March.
    5. Eliza Lee & Ian Thynne & Baogang He, 2011. "Civic engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(2), pages 122-133, May.
    6. Shanshan Yang, 2008. "Public Participation In The Chinese Environmental Impact Assessment (Eia) System," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(01), pages 91-113.
    7. Fishkin, James S. & He, Baogang & Luskin, Robert C. & Siu, Alice, 2010. "Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 435-448, April.
    8. Stephen Elstub, 2010. "The Third Generation of Deliberative Democracy," Political Studies Review, Political Studies Association, vol. 8(3), pages 291-307, September.
    9. Hsiao, Chun Hua & Yang, Chyan, 2011. "The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: A co-citation analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 128-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meng, Tianguang & Su, Zheng, 2021. "When top-down meets bottom-up: Local officials and selective responsiveness within fiscal policymaking in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Ella M. Lebezova & Lyudmila A. Ovcharenko, 2022. "A model of citizens’ digital participation in the Smart Environment," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 62-85, October.
    3. Harri Raisio & Pirkko Vartiainen, 2015. "Accelerating the public’s learning curve on wicked policy issues: results from deliberative forums on euthanasia," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 339-361, September.
    4. Mariusz J. Ligarski & Tomasz Owczarek, 2024. "Preparing Quality of Life Surveys Versus Using Information for Sustainable Development: The Example of Polish Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 765-782, July.
    5. Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "The Normative Order of International Politics: Critique and Legitimacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 25-45.
    6. Palmyra Repette & Jamile Sabatini-Marques & Tan Yigitcanlar & Denilson Sell & Eduardo Costa, 2021. "The Evolution of City-as-a-Platform: Smart Urban Development Governance with Collective Knowledge-Based Platform Urbanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    7. Saguin, Kidjie, 2018. "Why the poor do not benefit from community-driven development: Lessons from participatory budgeting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 220-232.
    8. Shiau, Wen-Lung & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Yang, Han Suan, 2017. "Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 390-399.
    9. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy ca," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Lee Liu & Jie Liu & Zhenguo Zhang, 2014. "Environmental Justice and Sustainability Impact Assessment: In Search of Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts Caused by Coal Mining in Inner Mongolia, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Suhartono Suhartono & Roy Valiant Salomo & Umanto Eko Prasetyo, 2022. "The Alignment Challenges of Development Planning and Budgeting: Insights from Indonesia," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 34(1), pages 54-83, August.
    12. Joel Serey & Luis Quezada & Miguel Alfaro & Guillermo Fuertes & Rodrigo Ternero & Gustavo Gatica & Sebastian Gutierrez & Manuel Vargas, 2020. "Methodological Proposals for the Development of Services in a Smart City: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    13. Monika Berg & Rolf Lidskog, 2018. "Pathways to deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 11-24, May.
    14. Andrew F Smith, 2014. "Political deliberation and the challenge of bounded rationality," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 13(3), pages 269-291, August.
    15. Igor Dunayev & Nataliia Gavkalova & Aleksander Kud, 2023. "Designing a platform-based model of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 4(13 (124)), pages 46-56, August.
    16. Dong Yan & Paolo Davide Farah & Ivana Gaskova & Carlo Vittorio Giabardo, 2020. "Evaluating China’s Environmental Management and Risks Avoidance Policies and Regulations on Offshore Methane Hydrate Extraction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Bingqian Zhang & Guochao Peng & Caihua Liu & Zuopeng Justin Zhang & Sajjad M. Jasimuddin, 2022. "Adaptation behaviour in using one-stop smart governance apps: an exploratory study between digital immigrants and digital natives," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1971-1991, December.
    18. Vladimir V. Vagin & Sergey V. Romanov, 2017. "Budgeting Initiative in the BRICS Countries," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 113-121, August.
    19. Leśniewska-Napierała Katarzyna & Napierała Tomasz, 2020. "Participatory budgeting: creator or creation of a better place? Evidence from rural Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 48(48), pages 65-81, June.
    20. Abby Lindsay, 2018. "Social learning as an adaptive measure to prepare for climate change impacts on water provision in Peru," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 8(4), pages 477-487, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:dapvj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.