IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rom/mancon/v8y2014i1p763-771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating The Information Society In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru-Emil POPA
  • Daniel URITU

Abstract

The Information Society involves intensive the use of information in all areas of activity and has significant social and economic impact. This study aims to measure the information society in Romania and to compare the results with those registered by the other 28 member states. In order to measure the information society in Romania three methods will be applied: first of all we will measure the influence of information and communication technologies (ICT) on GDP, afterwards we will use the indicators from the ICT Development Index (IDI) to compare the results registered in Romania with the average registered in the European Union and in the end we will present the cost and affordability of ICT services using ICT Pricebasket. Even though Romania registered some improvements and followed the EU trend we are still far below the European average being almost in the last place at all indicators investigated. In order to earn a better place, Romania should implement a series of policies, following the directions proposed by the European Commission in 2010.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru-Emil POPA & Daniel URITU, 2014. "Evaluating The Information Society In Romania," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 763-771, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:763-771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://conference.management.ase.ro/archives/2014/pdf/75.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2014. "Family background and children's education," Chapters, in: Vanity Economics, chapter 22, pages 205-211, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Oecd, 2014. "Does Homework Perpetuate Inequities in Education?," PISA in Focus 46, OECD Publishing.
    3. Oecd, 2014. "What Are the Earnings Advantages from Education?," Education Indicators in Focus 27, OECD Publishing.
    4. Oecd, 2014. "How Innovative is the Education Sector?," Education Indicators in Focus 24, OECD Publishing.
    5. -, 2008. "The global information society: a statistical view," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 32785, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Oecd, 2014. "Does Pre-primary Education Reach Those Who Need it Most?," PISA in Focus 40, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Bogdan Zamfir, 2016. "Reflections On The Implementation Of Information Society In Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 272-276, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silla, Anne & Kallberg, Veli-Pekka, 2016. "Effect of railway safety education on the safety knowledge and behaviour intention of schoolchildren," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 9-16.
    2. Strohmaier, R. & Rainer, A., 2016. "Studying general purpose technologies in a multi-sector framework: The case of ICT in Denmark," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 34-49.
    3. Husein Abdul-Hamid & Sarah Mintz & Namrata Saraogi, 2017. "From Compliance to Learning," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 26331.
    4. Shenja van der GRAAF, 2014. "Smarten Up! Open Data, Toolkits and Participation in the Social City," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(96), pages 35-52, 4th quart.
    5. Geppert, Christian, 2015. "On the Distributional Implications of Demographic Change," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113070, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Kumar, Satish & Kwon, Hyouk-Tae & Choi, Kwang-Ho & Lim, Wonsub & Cho, Jae Hyun & Tak, Kyungjae & Moon, Il, 2011. "LNG: An eco-friendly cryogenic fuel for sustainable development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4264-4273.
    7. Yaqoot, Mohammed & Diwan, Parag & Kandpal, Tara C., 2017. "Financial attractiveness of decentralized renewable energy systems – A case of the central Himalayan state of Uttarakhand in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 973-991.
    8. Hilbert, Martin, 2016. "The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 567-581.
    9. Elena Claudia Meroni & Esperanza Vera-Toscano & Sara Flisi, 2016. "Indicators for early childhood education and care," JRC Research Reports JRC102774, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Rafail Prodani & Jozef Bushati & Aigars Andersons, 2019. "An assessment of impact of information and communication technology in enterprızes of Korça region," Post-Print hal-02342717, HAL.
    11. Mona M. Al-Kuwari & Luluwah Al-Fagih & Muammer Koç, 2021. "Asking the Right Questions for Sustainable Development Goals: Performance Assessment Approaches for the Qatar Education System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Shu Hu & Zheng Mu, 2020. "Some Time is Better Spent than Other Time: Chinese Adolescents’ Time Use and Developmental Outcomes," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1739-1765, October.
    13. Williams, Jenny & Bretteville-Jensen, Anne Line, 2014. "Does liberalizing cannabis laws increase cannabis use?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 20-32.
    14. Michael W. Toffel, 2016. "Enhancing the Practical Relevance of Research," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-082, Harvard Business School, revised Mar 2016.
    15. Giorgio Di Pietro & Federico Biagi & Patricia Costa & Zbigniew Karpinski & Jacopo Mazza, 2020. "The likely impact of COVID-19 on education: Reflections based on the existing literature and recent international datasets," JRC Research Reports JRC121071, Joint Research Centre.
    16. Farag, Sendy & Lyons, Glenn, 2012. "To use or not to use? An empirical study of pre-trip public transport information for business and leisure trips and comparison with car travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 82-92.
    17. Бедарева Л. Ю. & Семионова Е. А. & Токарева Г. С., 2020. "Прогноз Развития Экономики В Сфере Дошкольного Образования На Примере Четырех Федеральных Округов России," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 60-82.
    18. Jesús García-Jiménez & Javier Rodríguez-Santero & Juan-Jesús Torres-Gordillo, 2020. "Influence of Contextual Variables on Educational Performance: A Study Using Hierarchical Segmentation Trees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-10, November.
    19. Neffa, Julio César, 2012. "La evolución de la relación salarial durante la post convertibilidad," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 11.
    20. Ewa, Lechman, 2009. "Development divide vs digital divide – cross country study," MPRA Paper 37770, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rom:mancon:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:763-771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ciocoiu Nadia Carmen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.