IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v40y2016i6p567-581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014

Author

Listed:
  • Hilbert, Martin

Abstract

In contrary to the common argument that the digital access divide is quickly closing and that the focus should shift to skills and usage, this article shows that access to digital communication is a moving target unlikely to ever be solved. While the number of subscriptions reaches population saturation levels, the bandwidth divide continuous to be dynamic. The article measures the nationally installed bandwidth potential of 172 countries from 1986 to 2014. The overarching finding is that the divide in terms of bandwidth does not show any clear monotonic pattern. It fluctuates up and down over the decades as the result of an intricate interplay between incessant technological progress and diffusion of technology. The bandwidth divide between high- and low income countries has first increased and only decreased below historic levels very recently during 2012–2014. In general it shows that the bandwidth divide is linked to the income divide, which is notoriously persistent. The bandwidth distribution among all countries is undergoing a new process of global concentration, during which North America and Europe is being replaced by Asia as the new global leader. In 2014 only 3 countries host 50% of the globally installed bandwidth potential (10 countries almost 75%). The U.S. lost its global leadership in 2011, being replaced by China, which contributes more than twice as much national bandwidth potential in 2014 (29% versus 13%). Despite this bad news about the continuous persistence of the digital access divide among countries, exploratory analysis from a global perspective brings the good news that many more individual people seem to enjoy more equal access to global bandwidth. All of this showcases the urgency to systematically develop indicators to track the digital divide in terms of bandwidth.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilbert, Martin, 2016. "The bad news is that the digital access divide is here to stay: Domestically installed bandwidths among 172 countries for 1986–2014," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 567-581.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:40:y:2016:i:6:p:567-581
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596116000276
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prieger, James E., 2013. "The broadband digital divide and the economic benefits of mobile broadband for rural areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 483-502.
    2. Kazi Arif-Uz-Zaman & A.M.M. Nazmul Ahsan, 2014. "Lean supply chain performance measurement," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 63(5), pages 588-612, June.
    3. ., 2014. "Types of costs and their measurement," Chapters, in: Cost–Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations, Second Edition, chapter 3, pages 61-87, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Oecd, 2001. "Understanding the Digital Divide," OECD Digital Economy Papers 49, OECD Publishing.
    5. Vicente, María Rosalía & López, Ana Jesús, 2011. "Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 220-237, April.
    6. ., 2014. "Deterrence measures," Chapters, in: Confronting the Shadow Economy, chapter 6, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. World Bank, 2015. "World Development Indicators 2015," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 21634.
    8. James B. Pick & Avijit Sarkar, 2015. "The Global Digital Divides," Progress in IS, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-662-46602-5.
    9. ., 2014. "Measuring utilities in cost–utility analysis," Chapters, in: Cost–Benefit Analysis and Health Care Evaluations, Second Edition, chapter 9, pages 247-280, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. ., 2014. "Number, weight and measure," Chapters, in: Trade in Health, chapter 2, pages 6-29, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Martin Hilbert, 2014. "How much of the global information and communication explosion is driven by more, and how much by better technology?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(4), pages 856-861, April.
    12. James B. Pick & Avijit Sarkar, 2015. "The Global Digital Divide," Progress in IS, in: The Global Digital Divides, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 83-111, Springer.
    13. Loo, Becky P.Y. & Ngan, Y.L., 2012. "Developing mobile telecommunications to narrow digital divide in developing countries? Some lessons from China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 888-900.
    14. KONISHI Yoko & Se-il MUN & NISHIYAMA Yoshihiko & Ji Eun SUNG, 2014. "Measuring the Value of Time in Freight Transportation," Discussion papers 14004, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    15. -, 2008. "The global information society: a statistical view," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 32785, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    16. James B. Pick & Avijit Sarkar, 2015. "United States Digital Divide," Progress in IS, in: The Global Digital Divides, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 235-274, Springer.
    17. Mendonça, Sandro & Crespo, Nuno & Simões, Nadia, 2015. "Inequality in the network society: An integrated approach to ICT access, basic skills, and complex capabilities," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 192-207.
    18. Martin Hilbert, 2014. "Technological information inequality as an incessantly moving target: The redistribution of information and communication capacities between 1986 and 2010," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(4), pages 821-835, April.
    19. Krämer, Jan & Wiewiorra, Lukas & Weinhardt, Christof, 2013. "Net neutrality: A progress report," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 794-813.
    20. Neokosmidis, Ioannis & Avaritsiotis, Nikolaos & Ventoura, Zoe & Varoutas, Dimitris, 2015. "Assessment of the gap and (non-)Internet users evolution based on population biology dynamics," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 14-37.
    21. Martin Hilbert, 2016. "Big Data for Development: A Review of Promises and Challenges," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(1), pages 135-174, January.
    22. Komunjer, Ivana & Ng, Serena, 2014. "Measurement Errors In Dynamic Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(1), pages 150-175, February.
    23. Koutroumpis, Pantelis, 2009. "The economic impact of broadband on growth: A simultaneous approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 471-485, October.
    24. Pick, James B. & Sarkar, Avijit & Johnson, Jeremy, 2015. "United States digital divide: State level analysis of spatial clustering and multivariate determinants of ICT utilization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 16-32.
    25. Chi-Chur Chao & Eden S. H. Yu, 2014. "On Investment Measures and Trade," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: TRADE-RELATED INVESTMENT MEASURES Theory and Applications, chapter 1, pages 3-16, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    26. Minges, Michael, 2005. "Evaluation of e-readiness indices for Latin America and the Caribbean," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 31929, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    27. ., 2014. "Commitment measures," Chapters, in: Confronting the Shadow Economy, chapter 10, pages iii-iii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifeng Philip Chen & Edward J. Oughton & Jakub Zagdanski & Maggie Mo Jia & Peter Tyler, 2023. "Crowdsourced data indicates broadband has a positive impact on local business creation," Papers 2308.14734, arXiv.org.
    2. Haile Teklemariam, Mekuria & Kwon, Youngsun, 2018. "Reducing internet demand-side gap improves digital inclusion in low-income countries: - analysis that is more comprehensive," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190411, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Liu, Chun & Wang, Lian, 2021. "Who is left behind? Exploring the characteristics of China's broadband non-adopting families," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(9).
    4. Javier Barbero & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, 2022. "Technological, institutional, and geographical peripheries: regional development and risk of poverty in the European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 311-332, October.
    5. Holden , Stein T. & Tilahun , Mesfin, 2018. "Gender Digital Divide and Youth Business Group Leadership," CLTS Working Papers 5/18, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 16 Oct 2019.
    6. Malecki, Edward J., 2017. "Real people, virtual places, and the spaces in between," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 3-12.
    7. Grošelj, Darja & Reisdorf, Bianca C. & Petrovčič, Andraž, 2019. "Obtaining indirect internet access: An examination how reasons for internet non-use relate to proxy internet use," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 213-224.
    8. Holden, Stein T. & Tilahun, Mesfin, 2021. "Mobile phones, leadership and gender in rural business groups," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    9. Wim Naudé, 2023. "Late industrialisation and global value chains under platform capitalism," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 50(1), pages 91-119, March.
    10. Philip Chen & Edward J Oughton & Pete Tyler & Mo Jia & Jakub Zagdanski, 2020. "Evaluating the impact of next generation broadband on local business creation," Papers 2010.14113, arXiv.org.
    11. Grishchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    12. Baichang Zhong & Fenghui Zhu & Liying Xia, 2021. "Is There a Digital Divide Between Urban Students and Migrant Students in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, May.
    13. Abeliansky, Ana L. & Hilbert, Martin, 2017. "Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 35-48.
    14. Marta Borda & Natalia Grishchenko & Patrycja Kowalczyk-Rólczyńska, 2022. "Impact of Digital Inequality on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Fisher, Matthew & Freeman, Toby & Schram, Ashley & Baum, Fran & Friel, Sharon, 2020. "Implementing policy on next-generation broadband networks and implications for equity of access to high speed broadband: A case study of Australia's NBN," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7).
    16. Mekuria, Teklemariam & Kwon, Youngsun, 2017. "Investigating the Influence of Bridging the Digital Divide on Economic Growth and Corruption Control: Lessons from Developmental Economies to Developing Countries. The case of East African Countries," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168520, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. Zhouying Song & Tao Song & Yu Yang & Zhenbo Wang, 2019. "RETRACTED: Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Determinants of Digital Divide in China: A Multivariate Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1, August.
    18. Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Valarezo, Angel & López, Rafael & Garín-Muñoz, Teresa, 2021. "Digital divides across consumers of internet services in Spain using panel data 2007–2019. Narrowing or not?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2).
    19. Occhini, Giulia & Tranos, Emmanouil & Wolf, Levi John, 2023. "Occupational segregation in the digital economy? A Natural Language Processing approach using UK Web Data," SocArXiv z8xta, Center for Open Science.
    20. Vitor Miguel Ribeiro & Lei Bao, 2021. "Impact of next‐generation access networks on the innovation efficiency of Portuguese municipalities: A spatial econometrics approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1615-1637, October.
    21. Kubata, K. & Šimek, P., 2016. "Identification of Business Informatics Specifics in Agricultural Enterprises," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, September.
    22. Goel, Raj Kumar & Vishnoi, Shweta, 2022. "Urbanization and sustainable development for inclusiveness using ICTs," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6).
    23. Silva, Diego S. & Yamashita, Gabrielli Harumi & Cortimiglia, Marcelo Nogueira & Brust-Renck, Priscila G. & ten Caten, Carla Schwengber, 2022. "Are we ready to assess digital readiness? Exploring digital implications for social progress from the Network Readiness Index," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hilbert, Martin, 2015. "How ubiquitous is ubiquitous communication? Assessing bandwidth distributions among 172 countries from 1986 to 2013," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146310, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    2. Edith Kitzmantel, 2016. "EU-Fiskalregeln - Anker oder Mühlstein der europäischen Wirtschaftspolitik?," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 42(3), pages 431-450.
    3. repec:clr:wugarc:y:2016v:42i:03p:431 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Mahmood, Russell & Parshetti, Ganesh K. & Balasubramanian, Rajasekhar, 2016. "Energy, exergy and techno-economic analyses of hydrothermal oxidation of food waste to produce hydro-char and bio-oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 187-198.
    5. Szeles, Monica Răileanu, 2018. "New insights from a multilevel approach to the regional digital divide in the European Union," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 452-463.
    6. Nishijima, Marislei & Ivanauskas, Terry Macedo & Sarti, Flavia Mori, 2017. "Evolution and determinants of digital divide in Brazil (2005–2013)," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 12-24.
    7. Zhouying Song & Tao Song & Yu Yang & Zhenbo Wang, 2019. "RETRACTED: Spatial–Temporal Characteristics and Determinants of Digital Divide in China: A Multivariate Spatial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1, August.
    8. Jun Wen & Hadi Hussain & Renai Jiang & Junaid Waheed, 2023. "Overcoming the Digital Divide With ICT Diffusion: Multivariate and Spatial Analysis at China’s Provincial Level," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    9. Grishchenko, Natalia, 2020. "The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(8).
    10. Sarkar, Avijit & Pick, James B. & Johnson, Jeremy, 2015. "Africa's digital divide: Geography, policy, and implications," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146339, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    11. Wang, Di & Zhou, Tao & Lan, Feng & Wang, Mengmeng, 2021. "ICT and socio-economic development: Evidence from a spatial panel data analysis in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    12. Abeliansky, Ana L. & Hilbert, Martin, 2017. "Digital technology and international trade: Is it the quantity of subscriptions or the quality of data speed that matters?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 35-48.
    13. Ali, Mohammad Afshar & Alam, Khorshed & Taylor, Brad, 2020. "Measuring the concentration of information and communication technology infrastructure in Australia: Do affordability and remoteness matter?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    14. Olimpia NEAGU, 2019. "Digital Divide Gap Convergence Across European Union: The Role Of Urbanisation," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 4(1), pages 43-48.
    15. Viktor Ivanovich Blanutsa, 2022. "Regionalization of the Digital Economic Space: Contours of Emerging Approaches," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 56-82.
    16. Ventura, Eva & Satorra, Albert, 2015. "A multiple indicator model for panel data: an application to ICT area-level variation," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    17. Margarita Billon & Rocio Marco & Fernando Lera-Lopez, 2017. "Innovation and ICT use in the EU: an analysis of regional drivers," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1083-1108, November.
    18. Silvana Rossy Brito & Aleksandra Socorro da Silva & Eulália Carvalho Mata & Nandamudi Lankalapalli Vijaykumar & Cláudio Alex Jorge Rocha & Maurílio Abreu Monteiro & João Crisóstomo Weyl Albuquerque Co, 0. "An approach to evaluate large-scale ICT training interventions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    19. Sadaf Bashir & Bert Sadowski, 2014. "General Purpose Technologies: A Survey, a Critique and Future Research Directions," Working Papers 14-02, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2014.
    20. Alathur, Sreejith & Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. & Gupta, M.P., 2016. "Determinants of e-participation in the citizens and the government initiatives: Insights from India," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 25-35.
    21. Jung, Juan, 2014. "Regional inequalities in the impact of broadband on productivity: Evidence from Brazil," MPRA Paper 56177, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:40:y:2016:i:6:p:567-581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.