IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0187240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recent development of risk-prediction models for incident hypertension: An updated systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Dongdong Sun
  • Jielin Liu
  • Lei Xiao
  • Ya Liu
  • Zuoguang Wang
  • Chuang Li
  • Yongxin Jin
  • Qiong Zhao
  • Shaojun Wen

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a leading global health threat and a major cardiovascular disease. Since clinical interventions are effective in delaying the disease progression from prehypertension to hypertension, diagnostic prediction models to identify patient populations at high risk for hypertension are imperative. Methods: Both PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible reports of either prediction models or risk scores of hypertension. The study data were collected, including risk factors, statistic methods, characteristics of study design and participants, performance measurement, etc. Results: From the searched literature, 26 studies reporting 48 prediction models were selected. Among them, 20 reports studied the established models using traditional risk factors, such as body mass index (BMI), age, smoking, blood pressure (BP) level, parental history of hypertension, and biochemical factors, whereas 6 reports used genetic risk score (GRS) as the prediction factor. AUC ranged from 0.64 to 0.97, and C-statistic ranged from 60% to 90%. Conclusions: The traditional models are still the predominant risk prediction models for hypertension, but recently, more models have begun to incorporate genetic factors as part of their model predictors. However, these genetic predictors need to be well selected. The current reported models have acceptable to good discrimination and calibration ability, but whether the models can be applied in clinical practice still needs more validation and adjustment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongdong Sun & Jielin Liu & Lei Xiao & Ya Liu & Zuoguang Wang & Chuang Li & Yongxin Jin & Qiong Zhao & Shaojun Wen, 2017. "Recent development of risk-prediction models for incident hypertension: An updated systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187240
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187240
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187240&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0187240?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui & G David Batty & Mika Kivimäki & Andre P Kengne, 2013. "Risk Models to Predict Hypertension: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Ziaul Islam Chowdhury & Iffat Naeem & Hude Quan & Alexander A Leung & Khokan C Sikdar & Maeve O’Beirne & Tanvir C Turin, 2022. "Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Yi-Hsueh Liu & Szu-Chia Chen & Wen-Hsien Lee & Ying-Chih Chen & Po-Chao Hsu & Wei-Chung Tsai & Chee-Siong Lee & Tsung-Hsien Lin & Chih-Hsing Hung & Chao-Hung Kuo & Ho-Ming Su, 2022. "Prognostic Factors of New-Onset Hypertension in New and Traditional Hypertension Definition in a Large Taiwanese Population Follow-up Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Cornelia Bala & Adriana Rusu & Oana Florentina Gheorghe-Fronea & Theodora Benedek & Calin Pop & Aura Elena Vijiiac & Diana Stanciulescu & Dan Darabantiu & Gabriela Roman & Maria Dorobantu, 2023. "Social and Metabolic Determinants of Prevalent Hypertension in Men and Women: A Cluster Analysis from a Population-Based Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Latifa A AlKaabi & Lina S Ahmed & Maryam F Al Attiyah & Manar E Abdel-Rahman, 2020. "Predicting hypertension using machine learning: Findings from Qatar Biobank Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Michael Lebenbaum & Osvaldo Espin-Garcia & Yi Li & Laura C Rosella, 2018. "Development and validation of a population based risk algorithm for obesity: The Obesity Population Risk Tool (OPoRT)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Junghye Lee & Ryeok-Hwan Kwon & Hyung Woo Kim & Sung-Hong Kang & Kwang-Jae Kim & Chi-Hyuck Jun, 2018. "A Data-Driven Procedure of Providing a Health Promotion Program for Hypertension Prevention," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 289-301, September.
    4. Gaojun Cai & Bifeng Zhang & Weijin Weng & Ganwei Shi & Sheliang Xue & Yanbin Song & Chunyan Ma, 2014. "E-Selectin Gene Polymorphisms and Essential Hypertension in Asian Population: An Updated Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-9, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.