IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0033469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Methodological and Ecological Approaches on Heterogeneity of Nest-Site Selection of a Long-Lived Vulture

Author

Listed:
  • Rubén Moreno-Opo
  • Mariana Fernández-Olalla
  • Antoni Margalida
  • Ángel Arredondo
  • Francisco Guil

Abstract

The application of scientific-based conservation measures requires that sampling methodologies in studies modelling similar ecological aspects produce comparable results making easier their interpretation. We aimed to show how the choice of different methodological and ecological approaches can affect conclusions in nest-site selection studies along different Palearctic meta-populations of an indicator species. First, a multivariate analysis of the variables affecting nest-site selection in a breeding colony of cinereous vulture (Aegypius monachus) in central Spain was performed. Then, a meta-analysis was applied to establish how methodological and habitat-type factors determine differences and similarities in the results obtained by previous studies that have modelled the forest breeding habitat of the species. Our results revealed patterns in nesting-habitat modelling by the cinereous vulture throughout its whole range: steep and south-facing slopes, great cover of large trees and distance to human activities were generally selected. The ratio and situation of the studied plots (nests/random), the use of plots vs. polygons as sampling units and the number of years of data set determined the variability explained by the model. Moreover, a greater size of the breeding colony implied that ecological and geomorphological variables at landscape level were more influential. Additionally, human activities affected in greater proportion to colonies situated in Mediterranean forests. For the first time, a meta-analysis regarding the factors determining nest-site selection heterogeneity for a single species at broad scale was achieved. It is essential to homogenize and coordinate experimental design in modelling the selection of species' ecological requirements in order to avoid that differences in results among studies would be due to methodological heterogeneity. This would optimize best conservation and management practices for habitats and species in a global context.

Suggested Citation

  • Rubén Moreno-Opo & Mariana Fernández-Olalla & Antoni Margalida & Ángel Arredondo & Francisco Guil, 2012. "Effect of Methodological and Ecological Approaches on Heterogeneity of Nest-Site Selection of a Long-Lived Vulture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0033469
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0033469
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0033469&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0033469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T. B. Hallett & T. Coulson & J. G. Pilkington & T. H. Clutton-Brock & J. M. Pemberton & B. T. Grenfell, 2004. "Why large-scale climate indices seem to predict ecological processes better than local weather," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(6995), pages 71-75, July.
    2. D. A. Williams, 1987. "Generalized Linear Model Diagnostics Using the Deviance and Single Case Deletions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 36(2), pages 181-191, June.
    3. Michael Doebeli & Ulf Dieckmann, 2003. "Speciation along environmental gradients," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6920), pages 259-264, January.
    4. Austin, Mike, 2007. "Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 1-19.
    5. Elena Kulinskaya & Michael B. Dollinger & Kirsten Bjørkestøl, 2011. "Testing for Homogeneity in Meta-Analysis I. The One-Parameter Case: Standardized Mean Difference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(1), pages 203-212, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Ezquerro & Marta Pardos & Luis Diaz-Balteiro, 2019. "Sustainability in Forest Management Revisited Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Esther Ortiz-Urbina & Luis Diaz-Balteiro & Carlos Iglesias-Merchan, 2020. "Influence of Anthropogenic Noise for Predicting Cinereous Vulture Nest Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Václavík, Tomáš & Meentemeyer, Ross K., 2009. "Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): Are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3248-3258.
    2. Mazzucco, Rupert & Van Nguyen, Tuyen & Kim, Dong-Hwan & Chon, Tae-Soo & Dieckmann, Ulf, 2015. "Adaptation of aquatic insects to the current flow in streams," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 309, pages 143-152.
    3. Muñoz-Mas, Rafael & Vezza, Paolo & Alcaraz-Hernández, Juan Diego & Martínez-Capel, Francisco, 2016. "Risk of invasion predicted with support vector machines: A case study on northern pike (Esox Lucius, L.) and bleak (Alburnus alburnus, L.)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 342(C), pages 123-134.
    4. Meineri, Eric & Dahlberg, C. Johan & Hylander, Kristoffer, 2015. "Using Gaussian Bayesian Networks to disentangle direct and indirect associations between landscape physiography, environmental variables and species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 313(C), pages 127-136.
    5. Marmion, Mathieu & Luoto, Miska & Heikkinen, Risto K. & Thuiller, Wilfried, 2009. "The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(24), pages 3512-3520.
    6. Preisser, John S. & Garcia, Daniel I., 2005. "Alternative computational formulae for generalized linear model diagnostics: identifying influential observations with SAS software," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 755-764, April.
    7. Kaiping Wang & Weiqi Wang & Niyi Zha & Yue Feng & Chenlan Qiu & Yunlu Zhang & Jia Ma & Rui Zhang, 2022. "Spatially Heterogeneity Response of Critical Ecosystem Service Capacity to Address Regional Development Risks to Rapid Urbanization: The Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-21, June.
    8. M. Revan Özkale & Stanley Lemeshow & Rodney Sturdivant, 2018. "Logistic regression diagnostics in ridge regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 563-593, June.
    9. Sellami, Mohamed Habib & Sifaoui, Mohamed Salah, 2008. "Modelling of heat and mass transfer inside a traditional oasis: Experimental validation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 144-154.
    10. José Hódar & Regino Zamora & Luis Cayuela, 2012. "Climate change and the incidence of a forest pest in Mediterranean ecosystems: can the North Atlantic Oscillation be used as a predictor?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 699-711, August.
    11. Di Traglia, Mario & Attorre, Fabio & Francesconi, Fabio & Valenti, Roberto & Vitale, Marcello, 2011. "Is cellular automata algorithm able to predict the future dynamical shifts of tree species in Italy under climate change scenarios? A methodological approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 925-934.
    12. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2010. "Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(16), pages 1995-2002.
    13. Åke Brännström & Jacob Johansson & Niels Von Festenberg, 2013. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Adaptive Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, June.
    14. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.
    15. Lyndsie S Wszola & Victoria L Simonsen & Erica F Stuber & Caitlyn R Gillespie & Lindsey N Messinger & Karie L Decker & Jeffrey J Lusk & Christopher F Jorgensen & Andrew A Bishop & Joseph J Fontaine, 2017. "Translating statistical species-habitat models to interactive decision support tools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Basille, Mathieu & Calenge, Clément & Marboutin, Éric & Andersen, Reidar & Gaillard, Jean-Michel, 2008. "Assessing habitat selection using multivariate statistics: Some refinements of the ecological-niche factor analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 211(1), pages 233-240.
    17. Rufino, Marta M. & Albouy, Camille & Brind'Amour, Anik, 2021. "Which spatial interpolators I should use? A case study applying to marine species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 449(C).
    18. Mouton, Ans M. & De Baets, Bernard & Van Broekhoven, Ester & Goethals, Peter L.M., 2009. "Prevalence-adjusted optimisation of fuzzy models for species distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(15), pages 1776-1786.
    19. Stoklosa, Jakub & Huang, Yih-Huei & Furlan, Elise & Hwang, Wen-Han, 2016. "On quadratic logistic regression models when predictor variables are subject to measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 109-121.
    20. Suárez-Seoane, Susana & García de la Morena, Eladio L. & Morales Prieto, Manuel B. & Osborne, Patrick E. & de Juana, Eduardo, 2008. "Maximum entropy niche-based modelling of seasonal changes in little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) distribution," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 17-29.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0033469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.