IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0013492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Children with Reading Disability Show Brain Differences in Effective Connectivity for Visual, but Not Auditory Word Comprehension

Author

Listed:
  • Li Liu
  • Amit Vira
  • Emma Friedman
  • Jennifer Minas
  • Donald Bolger
  • Tali Bitan
  • James Booth

Abstract

Background: Previous literature suggests that those with reading disability (RD) have more pronounced deficits during semantic processing in reading as compared to listening comprehension. This discrepancy has been supported by recent neuroimaging studies showing abnormal activity in RD during semantic processing in the visual but not in the auditory modality. Whether effective connectivity between brain regions in RD could also show this pattern of discrepancy has not been investigated. Methodology/Principal Findings: Children (8- to 14-year-olds) were given a semantic task in the visual and auditory modality that required an association judgment as to whether two sequentially presented words were associated. Effective connectivity was investigated using Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Bayesian Model Selection (BMS) was used separately for each modality to find a winning family of DCM models separately for typically developing (TD) and RD children. BMS yielded the same winning family with modulatory effects on bottom-up connections from the input regions to middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and inferior frontal gyrus(IFG) with inconclusive evidence regarding top-down modulations. Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) was thus conducted across models in this winning family and compared across groups. The bottom-up effect from the fusiform gyrus (FG) to MTG rather than the top-down effect from IFG to MTG was stronger in TD compared to RD for the visual modality. The stronger bottom-up influence in TD was only evident for related word pairs but not for unrelated pairs. No group differences were noted in the auditory modality. Conclusions/Significance: This study revealed a modality-specific deficit for children with RD in bottom-up effective connectivity from orthographic to semantic processing regions. There were no group differences in connectivity from frontal regions, suggesting that the core deficit in RD is not in top-down modulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Liu & Amit Vira & Emma Friedman & Jennifer Minas & Donald Bolger & Tali Bitan & James Booth, 2010. "Children with Reading Disability Show Brain Differences in Effective Connectivity for Visual, but Not Auditory Word Comprehension," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-11, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013492
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013492
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013492&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0013492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Will D Penny & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Maria J Rosa & Karl J Friston & Thomas M Schofield & Alex P Leff, 2010. "Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitrije Marković & Jan Gläscher & Peter Bossaerts & John O’Doherty & Stefan J Kiebel, 2015. "Modeling the Evolution of Beliefs Using an Attentional Focus Mechanism," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    2. Moe Okayasu & Tensei Inukai & Daiki Tanaka & Kaho Tsumura & Reiko Shintaki & Masaki Takeda & Kiyoshi Nakahara & Koji Jimura, 2023. "The Stroop effect involves an excitatory–inhibitory fronto-cerebellar loop," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Andreea O Diaconescu & Christoph Mathys & Lilian A E Weber & Jean Daunizeau & Lars Kasper & Ekaterina I Lomakina & Ernst Fehr & Klaas E Stephan, 2014. "Inferring on the Intentions of Others by Hierarchical Bayesian Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Falk Lieder & Klaas E Stephan & Jean Daunizeau & Marta I Garrido & Karl J Friston, 2013. "A Neurocomputational Model of the Mismatch Negativity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Ahmed A Moustafa & Jony Sheynin & Catherine E Myers, 2015. "The Role of Informative and Ambiguous Feedback in Avoidance Behavior: Empirical and Computational Findings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Sam Gijsen & Miro Grundei & Robert T Lange & Dirk Ostwald & Felix Blankenburg, 2021. "Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-36, February.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9572 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Giovanni Leone & Charlotte Postel & Alison Mary & Florence Fraisse & Thomas Vallée & Fausto Viader & Vincent Sayette & Denis Peschanski & Jaques Dayan & Francis Eustache & Pierre Gagnepain, 2022. "Altered predictive control during memory suppression in PTSD," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Amir Dezfouli & Bernard W Balleine, 2013. "Actions, Action Sequences and Habits: Evidence That Goal-Directed and Habitual Action Control Are Hierarchically Organized," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Jean Daunizeau & Kerstin Preuschoff & Karl Friston & Klaas Stephan, 2011. "Optimizing Experimental Design for Comparing Models of Brain Function," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Fabien Vinckier & Lionel Rigoux & Irma T Kurniawan & Chen Hu & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Jean Daunizeau & Mathias Pessiglione, 2019. "Sour grapes and sweet victories: How actions shape preferences," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    12. Eduardo A Aponte & Dario Schöbi & Klaas E Stephan & Jakob Heinzle, 2017. "The Stochastic Early Reaction, Inhibition, and late Action (SERIA) model for antisaccades," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-36, August.
    13. Jean Daunizeau & Vincent Adam & Lionel Rigoux, 2014. "VBA: A Probabilistic Treatment of Nonlinear Models for Neurobiological and Behavioural Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Melody K Morris & Julio Saez-Rodriguez & David C Clarke & Peter K Sorger & Douglas A Lauffenburger, 2011. "Training Signaling Pathway Maps to Biochemical Data with Constrained Fuzzy Logic: Quantitative Analysis of Liver Cell Responses to Inflammatory Stimuli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Alizée Lopez-Persem & Lionel Rigoux & Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Jean Daunizeau & Mathias Pessiglione, 2017. "Choose, rate or squeeze: Comparison of economic value functions elicited by different behavioral tasks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    16. Richard P Mann & Andrea Perna & Daniel Strömbom & Roman Garnett & James E Herbert-Read & David J T Sumpter & Ashley J W Ward, 2013. "Multi-scale Inference of Interaction Rules in Animal Groups Using Bayesian Model Selection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.