IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1004222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genetic Diversity in the Interference Selection Limit

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin H Good
  • Aleksandra M Walczak
  • Richard A Neher
  • Michael M Desai

Abstract

Pervasive natural selection can strongly influence observed patterns of genetic variation, but these effects remain poorly understood when multiple selected variants segregate in nearby regions of the genome. Classical population genetics fails to account for interference between linked mutations, which grows increasingly severe as the density of selected polymorphisms increases. Here, we describe a simple limit that emerges when interference is common, in which the fitness effects of individual mutations play a relatively minor role. Instead, similar to models of quantitative genetics, molecular evolution is determined by the variance in fitness within the population, defined over an effectively asexual segment of the genome (a “linkage block”). We exploit this insensitivity in a new “coarse-grained” coalescent framework, which approximates the effects of many weakly selected mutations with a smaller number of strongly selected mutations that create the same variance in fitness. This approximation generates accurate and efficient predictions for silent site variability when interference is common. However, these results suggest that there is reduced power to resolve individual selection pressures when interference is sufficiently widespread, since a broad range of parameters possess nearly identical patterns of silent site variability.Author Summary: A central goal of evolutionary genetics is to understand how natural selection influences DNA sequence variability. Yet while empirical studies have uncovered significant evidence for selection in many natural populations, a rigorous characterization of these selection pressures has so far been difficult to achieve. The problem is that when selection acts on linked loci, it introduces correlations along the genome that are difficult to disentangle. These “interference” effects have been extensively studied in simulation, but theory still struggles to account for interference in predicted patterns of sequence variability, which limits the quantitative conclusions that can be drawn from modern sequence data. Here, we show that in spite of this complexity, simple behavior emerges in the limit that interference is common. Patterns of molecular evolution depend on the variance in fitness within the population, and are only weakly influenced by the fitness effects of individual mutations. We leverage this “emergent simplicity” to establish a new framework for predicting genetic diversity in these populations. Our results have important practical implications for the interpretation of natural sequence variability, particularly in regions of low recombination, and suggest an inherent “resolution limit” for the quantitative inference of selection pressures from sequence polymorphism data.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin H Good & Aleksandra M Walczak & Richard A Neher & Michael M Desai, 2014. "Genetic Diversity in the Interference Selection Limit," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-1, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1004222
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1004222&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey E. Barrick & Dong Su Yu & Sung Ho Yoon & Haeyoung Jeong & Tae Kwang Oh & Dominique Schneider & Richard E. Lenski & Jihyun F. Kim, 2009. "Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7268), pages 1243-1247, October.
    2. Kirk E Lohmueller & Anders Albrechtsen & Yingrui Li & Su Yeon Kim & Thorfinn Korneliussen & Nicolas Vinckenbosch & Geng Tian & Emilia Huerta-Sanchez & Alison F Feder & Niels Grarup & Torben Jørgensen , 2011. "Natural Selection Affects Multiple Aspects of Genetic Variation at Putatively Neutral Sites across the Human Genome," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Gregory I. Lang & Daniel P. Rice & Mark J. Hickman & Erica Sodergren & George M. Weinstock & David Botstein & Michael M. Desai, 2013. "Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 500(7464), pages 571-574, August.
    4. Carlos D. Bustamante & Rasmus Nielsen & Stanley A. Sawyer & Kenneth M. Olsen & Michael D. Purugganan & Daniel L. Hartl, 2002. "The cost of inbreeding in Arabidopsis," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6880), pages 531-534, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. RoyChoudhury, Arindam & Wakeley, John, 2010. "Sufficiency of the number of segregating sites in the limit under finite-sites mutation," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 118-122.
    2. Ida Lauritsen & Pernille Ott Frendorf & Silvia Capucci & Sophia A. H. Heyde & Sarah D. Blomquist & Sofie Wendel & Emil C. Fischer & Agnieszka Sekowska & Antoine Danchin & Morten H. H. Nørholm, 2021. "Temporal evolution of master regulator Crp identifies pyrimidines as catabolite modulator factors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Piaopiao Chen & Jianzhi Zhang, 2024. "The loci of environmental adaptation in a model eukaryote," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Amei Amei & Stanley Sawyer, 2012. "Statistical Inference of Selection and Divergence from a Time-Dependent Poisson Random Field Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    5. Ryo Mizuuchi & Taro Furubayashi & Norikazu Ichihashi, 2022. "Evolutionary transition from a single RNA replicator to a multiple replicator network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Simeon D. Castle & Michiel Stock & Thomas E. Gorochowski, 2024. "Engineering is evolution: a perspective on design processes to engineer biology," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Andreas Wagner, 2023. "Evolvability-enhancing mutations in the fitness landscapes of an RNA and a protein," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Benger, Etam & Sella, Guy, 2013. "Modeling the effect of changing selective pressures on polymorphism and divergence," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 73-85.
    9. Sébastien Boyer & Lucas Hérissant & Gavin Sherlock, 2021. "Adaptation is influenced by the complexity of environmental change during evolution in a dynamic environment," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Matteo Mori & Vadim Patsalo & Christian Euler & James R. Williamson & Matthew Scott, 2024. "Proteome partitioning constraints in long-term laboratory evolution," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Rachel A Myers & Ferran Casals & Julie Gauthier & Fadi F Hamdan & Jon Keebler & Adam R Boyko & Carlos D Bustamante & Amelie M Piton & Dan Spiegelman & Edouard Henrion & Martine Zilversmit & Julie Huss, 2011. "A Population Genetic Approach to Mapping Neurological Disorder Genes Using Deep Resequencing," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, February.
    12. Andrea Fulgione & Célia Neto & Ahmed F. Elfarargi & Emmanuel Tergemina & Shifa Ansari & Mehmet Göktay & Herculano Dinis & Nina Döring & Pádraic J. Flood & Sofia Rodriguez-Pacheco & Nora Walden & Marcu, 2022. "Parallel reduction in flowering time from de novo mutations enable evolutionary rescue in colonizing lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Linyue Zhang & Edward King & William B. Black & Christian M. Heckmann & Allison Wolder & Youtian Cui & Francis Nicklen & Justin B. Siegel & Ray Luo & Caroline E. Paul & Han Li, 2022. "Directed evolution of phosphite dehydrogenase to cycle noncanonical redox cofactors via universal growth selection platform," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Kelley Harris & Rasmus Nielsen, 2013. "Inferring Demographic History from a Spectrum of Shared Haplotype Lengths," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Kirsten E Eilertson & James G Booth & Carlos D Bustamante, 2012. "SnIPRE: Selection Inference Using a Poisson Random Effects Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Raul Torres & Zachary A Szpiech & Ryan D Hernandez, 2018. "Human demographic history has amplified the effects of background selection across the genome," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Wojtowicz Andrzej J. & Miller Craig R. & Joyce Paul, 2015. "Inference for one-step beneficial mutations using next generation sequencing," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 65-81, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1004222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.