IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1008262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing chromatin folding coordinate and landscape with deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Jun Xie
  • Yifeng Qi
  • Bin Zhang

Abstract

Genome organization is critical for setting up the spatial environment of gene transcription, and substantial progress has been made towards its high-resolution characterization. The underlying molecular mechanism for its establishment is much less understood. We applied a deep-learning approach, variational autoencoder (VAE), to analyze the fluctuation and heterogeneity of chromatin structures revealed by single-cell imaging and to identify a reaction coordinate for chromatin folding. This coordinate connects the seemingly random structures observed in individual cohesin-depleted cells as intermediate states along a folding pathway that leads to the formation of topologically associating domains (TAD). We showed that folding into wild-type-like structures remain energetically favorable in cohesin-depleted cells, potentially as a result of the phase separation between the two chromatin segments with active and repressive histone marks. The energetic stabilization, however, is not strong enough to overcome the entropic penalty, leading to the formation of only partially folded structures and the disappearance of TADs from contact maps upon averaging. Our study suggests that machine learning techniques, when combined with rigorous statistical mechanical analysis, are powerful tools for analyzing structural ensembles of chromatin.Author summary: Chromatin folding, the dynamical process during which chromatin establishes its three-dimensional organization for proper function, is of critical importance. However, it is difficult to visualize and characterize due to challenges associated with live-cell imaging at high temporal and spatial resolution. Here, using a combination of deep learning and statistical mechanical theory, we demonstrate that great insight can be gained into the folding process by analyzing snapshots of chromatin structures taken across a population of cells. Though these static structures are not connected in time, prior research on chemical reactions suggests that fluctuation within the conformational ensemble provides valuable information for uncovering the reaction mechanism. Our analysis reconciles the seemingly contradictory results from different experimental techniques and supports the presence of multiple factors in organizing the chromatin. As single-cell experimental data are becoming routine, the approaches presented here could help with their interpretation to provide more insight into chromatin folding.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Jun Xie & Yifeng Qi & Bin Zhang, 2020. "Characterizing chromatin folding coordinate and landscape with deep learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008262
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008262
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008262&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ralph Stadhouders & Guillaume J. Filion & Thomas Graf, 2019. "Transcription factors and 3D genome conformation in cell-fate decisions," Nature, Nature, vol. 569(7756), pages 345-354, May.
    2. Jesse R. Dixon & Siddarth Selvaraj & Feng Yue & Audrey Kim & Yan Li & Yin Shen & Ming Hu & Jun S. Liu & Bing Ren, 2012. "Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 376-380, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomas Zelenka & Antonios Klonizakis & Despina Tsoukatou & Dionysios-Alexandros Papamatheakis & Sören Franzenburg & Petros Tzerpos & Ioannis-Rafail Tzonevrakis & George Papadogkonas & Manouela Kapsetak, 2022. "The 3D enhancer network of the developing T cell genome is shaped by SATB1," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Zhi Liu & Dong-Sung Lee & Yuqiong Liang & Ye Zheng & Jesse R. Dixon, 2023. "Foxp3 orchestrates reorganization of chromatin architecture to establish regulatory T cell identity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Gabrielle A. Dotson & Can Chen & Stephen Lindsly & Anthony Cicalo & Sam Dilworth & Charles Ryan & Sivakumar Jeyarajan & Walter Meixner & Cooper Stansbury & Joshua Pickard & Nicholas Beckloff & Amit Su, 2022. "Deciphering multi-way interactions in the human genome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Zhen-Hui Wang & Xin-Feng Wang & Tianyuan Lu & Ming-Rui Li & Peng Jiang & Jing Zhao & Si-Tong Liu & Xue-Qi Fu & Jonathan F. Wendel & Yves Peer & Bao Liu & Lin-Feng Li, 2022. "Reshuffling of the ancestral core-eudicot genome shaped chromatin topology and epigenetic modification in Panax," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Li, Xiao & Matsuda, Takeru & Komaki, Fumiyasu, 2024. "Empirical Bayes Poisson matrix completion," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Bhuwan Khatri & Kandice L. Tessneer & Astrid Rasmussen & Farhang Aghakhanian & Tove Ragna Reksten & Adam Adler & Ilias Alevizos & Juan-Manuel Anaya & Lara A. Aqrawi & Eva Baecklund & Johan G. Brun & S, 2022. "Genome-wide association study identifies Sjögren’s risk loci with functional implications in immune and glandular cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    7. Maria A. Missinato & Sean Murphy & Michaela Lynott & Michael S. Yu & Anaïs Kervadec & Yu-Ling Chang & Suraj Kannan & Mafalda Loreti & Christopher Lee & Prashila Amatya & Hiroshi Tanaka & Chun-Teng Hua, 2023. "Conserved transcription factors promote cell fate stability and restrict reprogramming potential in differentiated cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    8. Liyuan Zhou & Qiongzi Qiu & Qing Zhou & Jianwei Li & Mengqian Yu & Kezhen Li & Lingling Xu & Xiaohui Ke & Haiming Xu & Bingjian Lu & Hui Wang & Weiguo Lu & Pengyuan Liu & Yan Lu, 2022. "Long-read sequencing unveils high-resolution HPV integration and its oncogenic progression in cervical cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Vinícius G. Contessoto & Olga Dudchenko & Erez Lieberman Aiden & Peter G. Wolynes & José N. Onuchic & Michele Pierro, 2023. "Interphase chromosomes of the Aedes aegypti mosquito are liquid crystalline and can sense mechanical cues," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Hossein Salari & Geneviève Fourel & Daniel Jost, 2024. "Transcription regulates the spatio-temporal dynamics of genes through micro-compartmentalization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Alon Diament & Tamir Tuller, 2015. "Improving 3D Genome Reconstructions Using Orthologous and Functional Constraints," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Andrea Wilderman & Eva D’haene & Machteld Baetens & Tara N. Yankee & Emma Wentworth Winchester & Nicole Glidden & Ellen Roets & Jo Dorpe & Sandra Janssens & Danny E. Miller & Miranda Galey & Kari M. B, 2024. "A distant global control region is essential for normal expression of anterior HOXA genes during mouse and human craniofacial development," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    13. Brent S. Perlman & Noah Burget & Yeqiao Zhou & Gregory W. Schwartz & Jelena Petrovic & Zora Modrusan & Robert B. Faryabi, 2024. "Enhancer-promoter hubs organize transcriptional networks promoting oncogenesis and drug resistance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Brault, Vincent & Ouadah, Sarah & Sansonnet, Laure & Lévy-Leduc, Céline, 2018. "Nonparametric multiple change-point estimation for analyzing large Hi-C data matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 143-165.
    15. Seungsoo Hahn & Dongsup Kim, 2015. "Identifying and Reducing Systematic Errors in Chromosome Conformation Capture Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Julia Minderjahn & Alexander Fischer & Konstantin Maier & Karina Mendes & Margit Nuetzel & Johanna Raithel & Hanna Stanewsky & Ute Ackermann & Robert Månsson & Claudia Gebhard & Michael Rehli, 2022. "Postmitotic differentiation of human monocytes requires cohesin-structured chromatin," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Pau Farré & Eldon Emberly, 2018. "A maximum-entropy model for predicting chromatin contacts," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Alexander Martinez-Fundichely & Austin Dixon & Ekta Khurana, 2022. "Modeling tissue-specific breakpoint proximity of structural variations from whole-genomes to identify cancer drivers," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Wu Zuo & Guangming Chen & Zhimei Gao & Shuai Li & Yanyan Chen & Chenhui Huang & Juan Chen & Zhengjun Chen & Ming Lei & Qian Bian, 2021. "Stage-resolved Hi-C analyses reveal meiotic chromosome organizational features influencing homolog alignment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Hao Li & Zebei Han & Yu Sun & Fu Wang & Pengzhen Hu & Yuang Gao & Xuemei Bai & Shiyu Peng & Chao Ren & Xiang Xu & Zeyu Liu & Hebing Chen & Yang Yang & Xiaochen Bo, 2024. "CGMega: explainable graph neural network framework with attention mechanisms for cancer gene module dissection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1008262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.