IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes

Author

Listed:
  • Nick E Phillips
  • Cerys Manning
  • Nancy Papalopulu
  • Magnus Rattray

Abstract

Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regulation of gene expression at the level of an individual cell involves reactions between finite numbers of molecules, and this can result in inherent randomness in expression dynamics, which blurs the boundaries between aperiodic fluctuations and noisy oscillators. This underlies a new challenge to the experimentalist because neither intuition nor pre-existing methods work well for identifying oscillatory activity in noisy biological time series. Thus, there is an acute need for an objective statistical method for classifying whether an experimentally derived noisy time series is periodic. Here, we present a new data analysis method that combines mechanistic stochastic modelling with the powerful methods of non-parametric regression with Gaussian processes. Our method can distinguish oscillatory gene expression from random fluctuations of non-oscillatory expression in single-cell time series, despite peak-to-peak variability in period and amplitude of single-cell oscillations. We show that our method outperforms the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in successfully classifying cells as oscillatory or non-oscillatory in data simulated from a simple genetic oscillator model and in experimental data. Analysis of bioluminescent live-cell imaging shows a significantly greater number of oscillatory cells when luciferase is driven by a Hes1 promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to oscillate, than the constitutive MoMuLV 5’ LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25). The method can be applied to data from any gene network to both quantify the proportion of oscillating cells within a population and to measure the period and quality of oscillations. It is publicly available as a MATLAB package.Author summary: Technological advances now allow us to observe gene expression in real-time at a single-cell level. In a wide variety of biological contexts this new data has revealed that gene expression is highly dynamic and possibly oscillatory. It is thought that periodic gene expression may be useful for keeping track of time and space, as well as transmitting information about signalling cues. Classifying a time series as periodic from single cell data is difficult because it is necessary to distinguish whether peaks and troughs are generated from an underlying oscillator or whether they are aperiodic fluctuations. To this end, we present a novel tool to classify live-cell data as oscillatory or non-oscillatory that accounts for inherent biological noise. We first demonstrate that the method outperforms a competing scheme in classifying computationally simulated single-cell data, and we subsequently analyse live-cell imaging time series. Our method is able to successfully detect oscillations in a known genetic oscillator, but it classifies data from a constitutively expressed gene as aperiodic. The method forms a basis for discovering new gene expression oscillators and quantifying how oscillatory activity alters in response to changes in cell fate and environmental or genetic perturbations.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick E Phillips & Cerys Manning & Nancy Papalopulu & Magnus Rattray, 2017. "Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-30, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005479
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naama Barkai & Stanislas Leibler, 2000. "Circadian clocks limited by noise," Nature, Nature, vol. 403(6767), pages 267-268, January.
    2. Marc Goodfellow & Nicholas E. Phillips & Cerys Manning & Tobias Galla & Nancy Papalopulu, 2014. "microRNA input into a neural ultradian oscillator controls emergence and timing of alternative cell states," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, May.
    3. Tomasz Zielinski & Anne M Moore & Eilidh Troup & Karen J Halliday & Andrew J Millar, 2014. "Strengths and Limitations of Period Estimation Methods for Circadian Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(5), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Michael J. Berridge, 1997. "The AM and FM of calcium signalling," Nature, Nature, vol. 386(6627), pages 759-760, April.
    5. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yuan & Cao, Jinde & Liu, Lixia & Liu, Haihong & Li, Zhouhong, 2024. "Complex role of time delay in dynamical coordination of neural progenitor fate decisions mediated by Notch pathway," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. O. Slaby & S. Sager & O. S. Shaik & U. Kummer & D. Lebiedz, 2007. "Optimal control of self-organized dynamics in cellular signal transduction," Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(5), pages 487-502, October.
    3. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Zhou, Peipei & Cai, Shuiming & Liu, Zengrong & Chen, Luonan & Wang, Ruiqi, 2013. "Coupling switches and oscillators as a means to shape cellular signals in biomolecular systems," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-126.
    5. Alok Maity & Roy Wollman, 2020. "Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Šimonka, Vito & Fras, Maja & Gosak, Marko, 2015. "Stochastic simulation of the circadian rhythmicity in the SCN neuronal network," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 424(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Alan L Hutchison & Mark Maienschein-Cline & Andrew H Chiang & S M Ali Tabei & Herman Gudjonson & Neil Bahroos & Ravi Allada & Aaron R Dinner, 2015. "Improved Statistical Methods Enable Greater Sensitivity in Rhythm Detection for Genome-Wide Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, March.
    8. Agne Tilūnaitė & Wayne Croft & Noah Russell & Tomas C Bellamy & Rüdiger Thul, 2017. "A Bayesian approach to modelling heterogeneous calcium responses in cell populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    9. Yujin Harada & Mayumi Yamada & Itaru Imayoshi & Ryoichiro Kageyama & Yutaka Suzuki & Takaaki Kuniya & Shohei Furutachi & Daichi Kawaguchi & Yukiko Gotoh, 2021. "Cell cycle arrest determines adult neural stem cell ontogeny by an embryonic Notch-nonoscillatory Hey1 module," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Peter C St. John & Francis J Doyle III, 2015. "Quantifying Stochastic Noise in Cultured Circadian Reporter Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    11. Stefano Ciliberti & Olivier C Martin & Andreas Wagner, 2007. "Robustness Can Evolve Gradually in Complex Regulatory Gene Networks with Varying Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, February.
    12. Irene Otero-Muras & Julio R Banga, 2016. "Design Principles of Biological Oscillators through Optimization: Forward and Reverse Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Mark Greenwood & Mirela Domijan & Peter D Gould & Anthony J W Hall & James C W Locke, 2019. "Coordinated circadian timing through the integration of local inputs in Arabidopsis thaliana," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-31, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.