IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Edge of Stability: Response Times and Delta Oscillations in Balanced Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Grant Gillary
  • Ernst Niebur

Abstract

The standard architecture of neocortex is a network with excitation and inhibition in closely maintained balance. These networks respond fast and with high precision to their inputs and they allow selective amplification of patterned signals. The stability of such networks is known to depend on balancing the strengths of positive and negative feedback. We here show that a second condition is required for stability which depends on the relative strengths and time courses of fast (AMPA) and slow (NMDA) currents in the excitatory projections. This condition also determines the response time of the network. We show that networks which respond quickly to an input are necessarily close to an oscillatory instability which resonates in the delta range. This instability explains the existence of neocortical delta oscillations and the emergence of absence epilepsy. Although cortical delta oscillations are a network-level phenomenon, we show that in non-pathological networks, individual neurons receive sufficient information to keep the network in the fast-response regime without sliding into the instability.Author Summary: Many networks in the brain are finely balanced, with equal contributions from excitation and inhibition. Deviations from this balance, if for instance the total amount of excitation exceeds that of inhibition, lead to potentially devastating instabilities. Unlike previous work we consider the interaction between fast and slow excitatory connections. We show that not only the amount of excitation needs to be controlled to achieve network stability but also the ratio of slow to fast excitation. Furthermore, optimally fast network performance requires that networks approach instability. However, networks very close to this instability develop oscillations in the delta range (1–4Hz) which potentially cause absence epilepsy. We show that a normal (non-pathological) network can auto-regulate its activity to avoid the instability.

Suggested Citation

  • Grant Gillary & Ernst Niebur, 2016. "The Edge of Stability: Response Times and Delta Oscillations in Balanced Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005121
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005121
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005121&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo E. Dolmetsch & Keli Xu & Richard S. Lewis, 1998. "Calcium oscillations increase the efficiency and specificity of gene expression," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6679), pages 933-936, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Guang & Yi, Ming & Jia, Ya & Tang, Jun, 2009. "A constructive role of internal noise on coherence resonance induced by external noise in a calcium oscillation system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 273-283.
    2. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Andreja Jovic & Bryan Howell & Michelle Cote & Susan M Wade & Khamir Mehta & Atsushi Miyawaki & Richard R Neubig & Jennifer J Linderman & Shuichi Takayama, 2010. "Phase-Locked Signals Elucidate Circuit Architecture of an Oscillatory Pathway," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-8, December.
    4. Alok Maity & Roy Wollman, 2020. "Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Sundar Srinivasan & Brandon J Ausk & Jitendra Prasad & Dewayne Threet & Steven D Bain & Thomas S Richardson & Ted S Gross, 2010. "Rescuing Loading Induced Bone Formation at Senescence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, September.
    6. Agne Tilūnaitė & Wayne Croft & Noah Russell & Tomas C Bellamy & Rüdiger Thul, 2017. "A Bayesian approach to modelling heterogeneous calcium responses in cell populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Chanu, Athokpam Langlen & Singh, R.K. Brojen & Jeon, Jae-Hyung, 2024. "Exploring the interplay of intrinsic fluctuation and complexity in intracellular calcium dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Martin Rückl & Ian Parker & Jonathan S Marchant & Chamakuri Nagaiah & Friedrich W Johenning & Sten Rüdiger, 2015. "Modulation of Elementary Calcium Release Mediates a Transition from Puffs to Waves in an IP3R Cluster Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Patrick A Fletcher & Frédérique Clément & Alexandre Vidal & Joel Tabak & Richard Bertram, 2014. "Interpreting Frequency Responses to Dose-Conserved Pulsatile Input Signals in Simple Cell Signaling Motifs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.