IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rescuing Loading Induced Bone Formation at Senescence

Author

Listed:
  • Sundar Srinivasan
  • Brandon J Ausk
  • Jitendra Prasad
  • Dewayne Threet
  • Steven D Bain
  • Thomas S Richardson
  • Ted S Gross

Abstract

The increasing incidence of osteoporosis worldwide requires anabolic treatments that are safe, effective, and, critically, inexpensive given the prevailing overburdened health care systems. While vigorous skeletal loading is anabolic and holds promise, deficits in mechanotransduction accrued with age markedly diminish the efficacy of readily complied, exercise-based strategies to combat osteoporosis in the elderly. Our approach to explore and counteract these age-related deficits was guided by cellular signaling patterns across hierarchical scales and by the insight that cell responses initiated during transient, rare events hold potential to exert high-fidelity control over temporally and spatially distant tissue adaptation. Here, we present an agent-based model of real-time Ca2+/NFAT signaling amongst bone cells that fully described periosteal bone formation induced by a wide variety of loading stimuli in young and aged animals. The model predicted age-related pathway alterations underlying the diminished bone formation at senescence, and hence identified critical deficits that were promising targets for therapy. Based upon model predictions, we implemented an in vivo intervention and show for the first time that supplementing mechanical stimuli with low-dose Cyclosporin A can completely rescue loading induced bone formation in the senescent skeleton. These pre-clinical data provide the rationale to consider this approved pharmaceutical alongside mild physical exercise as an inexpensive, yet potent therapy to augment bone mass in the elderly. Our analyses suggested that real-time cellular signaling strongly influences downstream bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli, and quantification of these otherwise inaccessible, transient events in silico yielded a novel intervention with clinical potential.Author Summary: Post-menopausal and age-related osteoporosis afflicts large segments of the population and can markedly increase skeletal fragility. Bone fractures that occur as a consequence substantially increase health care expenditures and raise levels of morbidity. While strategies that prevent further loss of bone exist, options that compensate for bone loss accrued over age are less numerous. Physical exercise holds promise in this realm. However, in part due to deficits in how cells within bone respond to skeletal loading, readily complied exercise has proved ineffective in enhancing bone mass in the elderly. In this study, we examined whether the ability of physical exercise to increase bone mass can be restored at advanced age. To this end, we developed a computational model describing how a specific aspect (or pathway) activated in bone cells by skeletal loading may be altered with age. Our model proved successful in describing age-related pathway alterations and identified specific deficits that were amenable to therapeutic manipulation. We subsequently discovered that when an extremely inexpensive, currently approved pharmaceutical is used as a supplement, bone response to skeletal loading was completely rescued in aged animals. We believe that this result provides the rationale to consider this approach as a means to increasing bone mass in the elderly.

Suggested Citation

  • Sundar Srinivasan & Brandon J Ausk & Jitendra Prasad & Dewayne Threet & Steven D Bain & Thomas S Richardson & Ted S Gross, 2010. "Rescuing Loading Induced Bone Formation at Senescence," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000924
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000924&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Berridge & Martin D. Bootman & Peter Lipp, 1998. "Calcium - a life and death signal," Nature, Nature, vol. 395(6703), pages 645-648, October.
    2. Ricardo E. Dolmetsch & Keli Xu & Richard S. Lewis, 1998. "Calcium oscillations increase the efficiency and specificity of gene expression," Nature, Nature, vol. 392(6679), pages 933-936, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen Song & Alain Karma & James N Weiss & Zhilin Qu, 2016. "Long-Lasting Sparks: Multi-Metastability and Release Competition in the Calcium Release Unit Network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Yu, Guang & Yi, Ming & Jia, Ya & Tang, Jun, 2009. "A constructive role of internal noise on coherence resonance induced by external noise in a calcium oscillation system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 273-283.
    3. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    4. Andreja Jovic & Bryan Howell & Michelle Cote & Susan M Wade & Khamir Mehta & Atsushi Miyawaki & Richard R Neubig & Jennifer J Linderman & Shuichi Takayama, 2010. "Phase-Locked Signals Elucidate Circuit Architecture of an Oscillatory Pathway," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-8, December.
    5. Guillermo Solovey & Silvina Ponce Dawson, 2010. "Intra-Cluster Percolation of Calcium Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(2), pages 1-8, February.
    6. Alok Maity & Roy Wollman, 2020. "Information transmission from NFkB signaling dynamics to gene expression," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Agne Tilūnaitė & Wayne Croft & Noah Russell & Tomas C Bellamy & Rüdiger Thul, 2017. "A Bayesian approach to modelling heterogeneous calcium responses in cell populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Li, Xiang & Zhang, Suxia & Liu, Xijun & Wang, Xiaojing & Zhou, Anqi & Liu, Peng, 2018. "Important role of MAMs in bifurcation and coherence resonance of calcium oscillations," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 131-140.
    9. Chanu, Athokpam Langlen & Singh, R.K. Brojen & Jeon, Jae-Hyung, 2024. "Exploring the interplay of intrinsic fluctuation and complexity in intracellular calcium dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    10. Martin Rückl & Ian Parker & Jonathan S Marchant & Chamakuri Nagaiah & Friedrich W Johenning & Sten Rüdiger, 2015. "Modulation of Elementary Calcium Release Mediates a Transition from Puffs to Waves in an IP3R Cluster Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Grant Gillary & Ernst Niebur, 2016. "The Edge of Stability: Response Times and Delta Oscillations in Balanced Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    12. Patrick A Fletcher & Frédérique Clément & Alexandre Vidal & Joel Tabak & Richard Bertram, 2014. "Interpreting Frequency Responses to Dose-Conserved Pulsatile Input Signals in Simple Cell Signaling Motifs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.