IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1005014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Electrophysiological Coupling and Fusion between Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Cardiomyocytes

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua Mayourian
  • Ruben M Savizky
  • Eric A Sobie
  • Kevin D Costa

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) delivery has demonstrated promise in preclinical and clinical trials for myocardial infarction therapy; however, broad acceptance is hindered by limited understanding of hMSC-human cardiomyocyte (hCM) interactions. To better understand the electrophysiological consequences of direct heterocellular connections between hMSCs and hCMs, three original mathematical models were developed, representing an experimentally verified triad of hMSC families with distinct functional ion channel currents. The arrhythmogenic risk of such direct electrical interactions in the setting of healthy adult myocardium was predicted by coupling and fusing these hMSC models to the published ten Tusscher midcardial hCM model. Substantial variations in action potential waveform—such as decreased action potential duration (APD) and plateau height—were found when hCMs were coupled to the two hMSC models expressing functional delayed rectifier-like human ether à-go-go K+ channel 1 (hEAG1); the effects were exacerbated for fused hMSC-hCM hybrid cells. The third family of hMSCs (Type C), absent of hEAG1 activity, led to smaller single-cell action potential alterations during coupling and fusion, translating to longer tissue-level mean action potential wavelength. In a simulated 2-D monolayer of cardiac tissue, re-entry vulnerability with low (5%) hMSC insertion was approximately eight-fold lower with Type C hMSCs compared to hEAG1-functional hMSCs. A 20% decrease in APD dispersion by Type C hMSCs compared to hEAG1-active hMSCs supports the claim of reduced arrhythmogenic potential of this cell type with low hMSC insertion. However, at moderate (15%) and high (25%) hMSC insertion, the vulnerable window increased independent of hMSC type. In summary, this study provides novel electrophysiological models of hMSCs, predicts possible arrhythmogenic effects of hMSCs when directly coupled to healthy hCMs, and proposes that isolating a subset of hMSCs absent of hEAG1 activity may offer increased safety as a cell delivery cardiotherapy at low levels of hMSC-hCM coupling.Author Summary: Myocardial infarction—better known as a heart attack—strikes on average every 43 seconds in America. An emerging approach to treat myocardial infarction patients involves the delivery of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) to the damaged heart. While clinical trials of this therapeutic approach have yet to report adverse effects on heart electrical rhythm, such consequences have been implicated in simpler experimental systems and thus remain a concern. In this study, we utilized mathematical modeling to simulate electrical interactions arising from direct coupling between hMSCs and human heart cells to develop insight into the possible adverse effects of this therapeutic approach on human heart electrical activity, and to assess a novel strategy for reducing some potential risks of this therapy. We developed the first mathematical models of electrical activity of three families of hMSCs based on published experimental data, and integrated these with previously established mathematical models of human heart cell electrical activity. Our computer simulations demonstrated that one particular family of hMSCs minimized the disturbances in cardiac electrical activity both at the single-cell and tissue levels, suggesting that isolating this specific sub-population of hMSCs for myocardial delivery could potentially increase the safety of future hMSC-based heart therapies.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua Mayourian & Ruben M Savizky & Eric A Sobie & Kevin D Costa, 2016. "Modeling Electrophysiological Coupling and Fusion between Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Cardiomyocytes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005014
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005014
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005014&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amrita X Sarkar & Eric A Sobie, 2010. "Regression Analysis for Constraining Free Parameters in Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Vincent F. M. Segers & Richard T. Lee, 2008. "Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7181), pages 937-942, February.
    3. Michael C. Sanguinetti & Martin Tristani-Firouzi, 2006. "hERG potassium channels and cardiac arrhythmia," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7083), pages 463-469, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy Rumbell & James Kozloski, 2019. "Dimensions of control for subthreshold oscillations and spontaneous firing in dopamine neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, September.
    2. Amrita X Sarkar & Eric A Sobie, 2010. "Regression Analysis for Constraining Free Parameters in Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Jaspreet Kaur & Anders Nygren & Edward J Vigmond, 2014. "Fitting Membrane Resistance along with Action Potential Shape in Cardiac Myocytes Improves Convergence: Application of a Multi-Objective Parallel Genetic Algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Fang Du & Joseph J Babcock & Haibo Yu & Beiyan Zou & Min Li, 2015. "Global Analysis Reveals Families of Chemical Motifs Enriched for hERG Inhibitors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Bryan Cernuda & Christopher Thomas Fernandes & Salma Mohamed Allam & Matthew Orzillo & Gabrielle Suppa & Zuleen Chia Chang & Demosthenes Athanasopoulos & Zafir Buraei, 2019. "The molecular determinants of R-roscovitine block of hERG channels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Miles Miller & Marc Hafner & Eduardo Sontag & Noah Davidsohn & Sairam Subramanian & Priscilla E M Purnick & Douglas Lauffenburger & Ron Weiss, 2012. "Modular Design of Artificial Tissue Homeostasis: Robust Control through Synthetic Cellular Heterogeneity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Haiyan Mao & Xiaoli Lu & Justin Michael Karush & Xiaoyan Huang & Xi Yang & Yanna Ba & Ying Wang & Ningsheng Liu & Jianqing Zhou & Jiangfang Lian, 2013. "Pharmacologic Approach to Defective Protein Trafficking in the E637K-hERG Mutant with PD-118057 and Thapsigargin," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Willemijn Groenendaal & Francis A Ortega & Armen R Kherlopian & Andrew C Zygmunt & Trine Krogh-Madsen & David J Christini, 2015. "Cell-Specific Cardiac Electrophysiology Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Moniruzzaman & Mohammed Jabedul Hoque & Amrin Ahsan & Md Belayet Hossain, 2018. "Molecular Docking, Pharmacokinetic, and DFT Calculation of Naproxen and its Degradants," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 9(5), pages 7360-7365, October.
    10. Dahai Yu & Lin Lv & Li Fang & Bo Zhang & Junnan Wang & Ge Zhan & Lei Zhao & Xin Zhao & Baoxin Li, 2017. "Inhibitory effects and mechanism of dihydroberberine on hERG channels expressed in HEK293 cells," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Massimiliano Zaniboni & Francesca Cacciani & Robert L Lux, 2014. "Beat-to-Beat Cycle Length Variability of Spontaneously Beating Guinea Pig Sinoatrial Cells: Relative Contributions of the Membrane and Calcium Clocks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. John Walmsley & Jose F Rodriguez & Gary R Mirams & Kevin Burrage & Igor R Efimov & Blanca Rodriguez, 2013. "mRNA Expression Levels in Failing Human Hearts Predict Cellular Electrophysiological Remodeling: A Population-Based Simulation Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Carlos A. Z. Bassetto & Flavio Costa & Carlo Guardiani & Francisco Bezanilla & Alberto Giacomello, 2023. "Noncanonical electromechanical coupling paths in cardiac hERG potassium channel," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    14. Moniruzzaman & Mohammed Jabedul Hoque & Mohammad Nasir Uddin & Amrin Ahsan & Tareq Mahmud, 2018. "Quantum Chemical, Molecular Docking, and ADMET Predictions of Ketorolac and its Modified Analogues," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 11(5), pages 8723-8729, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1005014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.