IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1004577.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fluctuation-Driven Neural Dynamics Reproduce Drosophila Locomotor Patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Maesani
  • Pavan Ramdya
  • Steeve Cruchet
  • Kyle Gustafson
  • Richard Benton
  • Dario Floreano

Abstract

The neural mechanisms determining the timing of even simple actions, such as when to walk or rest, are largely mysterious. One intriguing, but untested, hypothesis posits a role for ongoing activity fluctuations in neurons of central action selection circuits that drive animal behavior from moment to moment. To examine how fluctuating activity can contribute to action timing, we paired high-resolution measurements of freely walking Drosophila melanogaster with data-driven neural network modeling and dynamical systems analysis. We generated fluctuation-driven network models whose outputs—locomotor bouts—matched those measured from sensory-deprived Drosophila. From these models, we identified those that could also reproduce a second, unrelated dataset: the complex time-course of odor-evoked walking for genetically diverse Drosophila strains. Dynamical models that best reproduced both Drosophila basal and odor-evoked locomotor patterns exhibited specific characteristics. First, ongoing fluctuations were required. In a stochastic resonance-like manner, these fluctuations allowed neural activity to escape stable equilibria and to exceed a threshold for locomotion. Second, odor-induced shifts of equilibria in these models caused a depression in locomotor frequency following olfactory stimulation. Our models predict that activity fluctuations in action selection circuits cause behavioral output to more closely match sensory drive and may therefore enhance navigation in complex sensory environments. Together these data reveal how simple neural dynamics, when coupled with activity fluctuations, can give rise to complex patterns of animal behavior.Author Summary: The brain is never quiet. Even in the absence of environmental cues, neurons receive and produce an ongoing barrage of fluctuating signals. These fluctuations are well studied in the sensory periphery but their potential influence on central circuits and behavior are unknown. In particular, activity fluctuations in action selection circuits—neural populations that drive an animal’s actions from moment to moment—may strongly influence behavior. To shed light on the influence of activity fluctuations on action timing, we developed a computational approach for automatically generating neural network models that reproduce large-scale, high-resolution behavioral measurements of freely walking Drosophila melanogaster. We found that models require stochastic activity fluctuations to reproduce complex Drosophila locomotor patterns. Specific fluctuation-driven dynamics allow these models to produce short and long bouts of locomotion in the absence of sensory cues and to reduce locomotor activity after sensory stimulation. These results support a role for ongoing activity fluctuations in the timing of animal behavior and reveal how behavioral shifts can be brought about through changes in the dynamics of neural circuits. Thus, simple dynamical mechanisms may underlie complex patterns of animal behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Maesani & Pavan Ramdya & Steeve Cruchet & Kyle Gustafson & Richard Benton & Dario Floreano, 2015. "Fluctuation-Driven Neural Dynamics Reproduce Drosophila Locomotor Patterns," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-24, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004577
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004577
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004577
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004577&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004577?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosa Cossart & Dmitriy Aronov & Rafael Yuste, 2003. "Attractor dynamics of network UP states in the neocortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6937), pages 283-288, May.
    2. Andrea Censi & Andrew D Straw & Rosalyn W Sayaman & Richard M Murray & Michael H Dickinson, 2013. "Discriminating External and Internal Causes for Heading Changes in Freely Flying Drosophila," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Dan Valente & Ilan Golani & Partha P Mitra, 2007. "Analysis of the Trajectory of Drosophila melanogaster in a Circular Open Field Arena," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(10), pages 1-9, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Milena Raffi & Ralph M Siegel, 2007. "A Functional Architecture of Optic Flow in the Inferior Parietal Lobule of the Behaving Monkey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Martinez-Saito, Mario, 2022. "Discrete scaling and criticality in a chain of adaptive excitable integrators," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Roberto F Galán, 2008. "On How Network Architecture Determines the Dominant Patterns of Spontaneous Neural Activity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Sen Song & Per Jesper Sjöström & Markus Reigl & Sacha Nelson & Dmitri B Chklovskii, 2005. "Highly Nonrandom Features of Synaptic Connectivity in Local Cortical Circuits," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(3), pages 1-1, March.
    5. Suchin S Gururangan & Alexander J Sadovsky & Jason N MacLean, 2014. "Analysis of Graph Invariants in Functional Neocortical Circuitry Reveals Generalized Features Common to Three Areas of Sensory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Sreedhar S Kumar & Jan Wülfing & Samora Okujeni & Joschka Boedecker & Martin Riedmiller & Ulrich Egert, 2016. "Autonomous Optimization of Targeted Stimulation of Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Christopher C Lapish & Jeremy K Seamans & Daniel Durstewitz, 2011. "Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Adam Ponzi & Jeffery R Wickens, 2013. "Optimal Balance of the Striatal Medium Spiny Neuron Network," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, April.
    9. David Holcman & Misha Tsodyks, 2006. "The Emergence of Up and Down States in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-8, March.
    10. Andreas Steimer & Kaspar Schindler, 2015. "Random Sampling with Interspike-Intervals of the Exponential Integrate and Fire Neuron: A Computational Interpretation of UP-States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Jorge Hidalgo & Luís F Seoane & Jesús M Cortés & Miguel A Muñoz, 2012. "Stochastic Amplification of Fluctuations in Cortical Up-States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-8, August.
    12. Asaph Zylbertal & Anat Kahan & Yoram Ben-Shaul & Yosef Yarom & Shlomo Wagner, 2015. "Prolonged Intracellular Na+ Dynamics Govern Electrical Activity in Accessory Olfactory Bulb Mitral Cells," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Fabiano Baroni & Joaquín J Torres & Pablo Varona, 2010. "History-Dependent Excitability as a Single-Cell Substrate of Transient Memory for Information Discrimination," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Chengfeng Xiao & R Meldrum Robertson, 2015. "Locomotion Induced by Spatial Restriction in Adult Drosophila," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Mihai A Petrovici & Bernhard Vogginger & Paul Müller & Oliver Breitwieser & Mikael Lundqvist & Lyle Muller & Matthias Ehrlich & Alain Destexhe & Anders Lansner & René Schüffny & Johannes Schemmel & Ka, 2014. "Characterization and Compensation of Network-Level Anomalies in Mixed-Signal Neuromorphic Modeling Platforms," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-30, October.
    16. Jesús Pérez-Ortega & Alejandro Akrouh & Rafael Yuste, 2024. "Stimulus encoding by specific inactivation of cortical neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1004577. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.