IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1002461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power-Law Inter-Spike Interval Distributions Infer a Conditional Maximization of Entropy in Cortical Neurons

Author

Listed:
  • Yasuhiro Tsubo
  • Yoshikazu Isomura
  • Tomoki Fukai

Abstract

The brain is considered to use a relatively small amount of energy for its efficient information processing. Under a severe restriction on the energy consumption, the maximization of mutual information (MMI), which is adequate for designing artificial processing machines, may not suit for the brain. The MMI attempts to send information as accurate as possible and this usually requires a sufficient energy supply for establishing clearly discretized communication bands. Here, we derive an alternative hypothesis for neural code from the neuronal activities recorded juxtacellularly in the sensorimotor cortex of behaving rats. Our hypothesis states that in vivo cortical neurons maximize the entropy of neuronal firing under two constraints, one limiting the energy consumption (as assumed previously) and one restricting the uncertainty in output spike sequences at given firing rate. Thus, the conditional maximization of firing-rate entropy (CMFE) solves a tradeoff between the energy cost and noise in neuronal response. In short, the CMFE sends a rich variety of information through broader communication bands (i.e., widely distributed firing rates) at the cost of accuracy. We demonstrate that the CMFE is reflected in the long-tailed, typically power law, distributions of inter-spike intervals obtained for the majority of recorded neurons. In other words, the power-law tails are more consistent with the CMFE rather than the MMI. Thus, we propose the mathematical principle by which cortical neurons may represent information about synaptic input into their output spike trains. Author Summary: The brain is a highly noisy information machine, making a striking contrast with man-made electric computers to which noise is merely harmful. However, little is known about the way neurons process information in the noisy states. Here, we explore the principle of noisy neural information processing in accurately recorded spike trains of in vivo cortical neurons. We found that their irregular spiking exhibits power-law statistics of inter-spike intervals. While the power law in neuronal firing itself is a surprising finding in neuroscience, a simple mathematics further reveals a possible link between the power law and neural code. Namely, we show that in vivo cortical neurons try to maximize the firing-rate entropy under joint constraints on the energy consumption and uncertainty of output spike trains. Our results suggest that the brain, which operates under a highly noisy environment and a severe limitation of the energy consumption, may employ a different computational principle from the mutual information maximization in the standard information theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Yasuhiro Tsubo & Yoshikazu Isomura & Tomoki Fukai, 2012. "Power-Law Inter-Spike Interval Distributions Infer a Conditional Maximization of Entropy in Cortical Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002461
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002461&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael London & Arnd Roth & Lisa Beeren & Michael Häusser & Peter E. Latham, 2010. "Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7302), pages 123-127, July.
    2. Klaus Wimmer & K Jannis Hildebrandt & R Matthias Hennig & Klaus Obermayer, 2008. "Adaptation and Selective Information Transmission in the Cricket Auditory Neuron AN2," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(9), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Thomas Klausberger & Peter J. Magill & László F. Márton & J. David B. Roberts & Philip M. Cobden & György Buzsáki & Peter Somogyi, 2003. "Brain-state- and cell-type-specific firing of hippocampal interneurons in vivo," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6925), pages 844-848, February.
    4. Yasuko Sugase & Shigeru Yamane & Shoogo Ueno & Kenji Kawano, 1999. "Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6747), pages 869-873, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giacomo Ascione & Bruno Toaldo, 2019. "A Semi-Markov Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Lansky, Petr & Polito, Federico & Sacerdote, Laura, 2023. "Input-output consistency in integrate and fire interconnected neurons," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    3. Tomas Barta & Lubomir Kostal, 2019. "The effect of inhibition on rate code efficiency indicators," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas Burra & Dirk Kerzel & Nathalie George, 2016. "Early Left Parietal Activity Elicited by Direct Gaze: A High-Density EEG Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Omri Harish & David Hansel, 2015. "Asynchronous Rate Chaos in Spiking Neuronal Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-38, July.
    3. Christian Meisel & Andreas Klaus & Christian Kuehn & Dietmar Plenz, 2015. "Critical Slowing Down Governs the Transition to Neuron Spiking," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Ravi Pancholi & Lauren Ryan & Simon Peron, 2023. "Learning in a sensory cortical microstimulation task is associated with elevated representational stability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Emiliano Torre & Carlos Canova & Michael Denker & George Gerstein & Moritz Helias & Sonja Grün, 2016. "ASSET: Analysis of Sequences of Synchronous Events in Massively Parallel Spike Trains," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, July.
    6. Tomoki Kurikawa & Kunihiko Kaneko, 2016. "Dynamic Organization of Hierarchical Memories," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Volker Pernice & Benjamin Staude & Stefano Cardanobile & Stefan Rotter, 2011. "How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Mizusaki, Beatriz E.P. & Agnes, Everton J. & Erichsen, Rubem & Brunnet, Leonardo G., 2017. "Learning and retrieval behavior in recurrent neural networks with pre-synaptic dependent homeostatic plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 479(C), pages 279-286.
    9. Vladimir Ilin & Ian H Stevenson & Maxim Volgushev, 2014. "Injection of Fully-Defined Signal Mixtures: A Novel High-Throughput Tool to Study Neuronal Encoding and Computations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-10, October.
    10. Matthias Schultze-Kraft & Markus Diesmann & Sonja Grün & Moritz Helias, 2013. "Noise Suppression and Surplus Synchrony by Coincidence Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Angulo-Garcia, David & Torcini, Alessandro, 2014. "Stable chaos in fluctuation driven neural circuits," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 233-245.
    12. Elena Krugliakova & Alexey Gorin & Anna Shestakova & Vasily Klucharev, 2015. "Short-Term Plasticity in Auditory Cortical Circuit Evoked by Monetary Incentive Delay Task," HSE Working papers WP BRP 55/PSY/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Evan S Schaffer & Srdjan Ostojic & L F Abbott, 2013. "A Complex-Valued Firing-Rate Model That Approximates the Dynamics of Spiking Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-11, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1002461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.