IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0040019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanics of Channel Gating of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor

Author

Listed:
  • Xinli Liu
  • Yechun Xu
  • Honglin Li
  • Xicheng Wang
  • Hualiang Jiang
  • Francisco J Barrantes

Abstract

The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) is a key molecule involved in the propagation of signals in the central nervous system and peripheral synapses. Although numerous computational and experimental studies have been performed on this receptor, the structural dynamics of the receptor underlying the gating mechanism is still unclear. To address the mechanical fundamentals of nAChR gating, both conventional molecular dynamics (CMD) and steered rotation molecular dynamics (SRMD) simulations have been conducted on the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of nAChR embedded in a dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) bilayer and water molecules. A 30-ns CMD simulation revealed a collective motion amongst C-loops, M1, and M2 helices. The inward movement of C-loops accompanying the shrinking of acetylcholine (ACh) binding pockets induced an inward and upward motion of the outer β-sheet composed of β9 and β10 strands, which in turn causes M1 and M2 to undergo anticlockwise motions around the pore axis. Rotational motion of the entire receptor around the pore axis and twisting motions among extracellular (EC), transmembrane (TM), and intracellular MA domains were also detected by the CMD simulation. Moreover, M2 helices undergo a local twisting motion synthesized by their bending vibration and rotation. The hinge of either twisting motion or bending vibration is located at the middle of M2, possibly the gate of the receptor. A complementary twisting-to-open motion throughout the receptor was detected by a normal mode analysis (NMA). To mimic the pulsive action of ACh binding, nonequilibrium MD simulations were performed by using the SRMD method developed in one of our laboratories. The result confirmed all the motions derived from the CMD simulation and NMA. In addition, the SRMD simulation indicated that the channel may undergo an open-close (O ↔ C) motion. The present MD simulations explore the structural dynamics of the receptor under its gating process and provide a new insight into the gating mechanism of nAChR at the atomic level.Author Summary: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) play an essential role in the propagation of signals in the central nervous system and peripheral synapses. However, their gating mechanism is still not fully understood. The cryo-EM structure of nAChRs provides a clue, but the dynamics of receptor structure remains to be elucidated. Using conventional molecular dynamics (CMD), normal mode analysis, and nonequilibrium MD techniques, we investigated the mechanical fundamentals of nAChR gating. Through the simulations, we detected the collective motions of the ligand-binding sites, extracellular (EC) domain, transmembrane (TM) domain, and intracellular (MA) domain, which together synthesize a local twisting motion of the M2 helices. To mimic the pulsive action of ligand binding, rotational motion of the receptor was simulated with the steered rotation MD (SRMD), a nonequilibrium MD method developed by us. The results indicate that the channel may undergo an open–close motion along with the rotation of the EC domain. Our study provides a clear picture of the correlation between the structural dynamics of nAChR and its gating mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinli Liu & Yechun Xu & Honglin Li & Xicheng Wang & Hualiang Jiang & Francisco J Barrantes, 2008. "Mechanics of Channel Gating of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0040019
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040019
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040019&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0040019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. KatjuS̆a Brejc & Willem J. van Dijk & Remco V. Klaassen & Mascha Schuurmans & John van der Oost & August B. Smit & Titia K. Sixma, 2001. "Crystal structure of an ACh-binding protein reveals the ligand-binding domain of nicotinic receptors," Nature, Nature, vol. 411(6835), pages 269-276, May.
    2. Atsuo Miyazawa & Yoshinori Fujiyoshi & Nigel Unwin, 2003. "Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6943), pages 949-955, June.
    3. Cecilia Bouzat & Fernanda Gumilar & Guillermo Spitzmaul & Hai-Long Wang & Diego Rayes & Scott B. Hansen & Palmer Taylor & Steven M. Sine, 2004. "Coupling of agonist binding to channel gating in an ACh-binding protein linked to an ion channel," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7002), pages 896-900, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rilei Yu & David J Craik & Quentin Kaas, 2011. "Blockade of Neuronal α7-nAChR by α-Conotoxin ImI Explained by Computational Scanning and Energy Calculations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Wenjun Zheng & Anthony Auerbach, 2011. "Decrypting the Sequence of Structural Events during the Gating Transition of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels Based on an Interpolated Elastic Network Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenjun Zheng & Anthony Auerbach, 2011. "Decrypting the Sequence of Structural Events during the Gating Transition of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels Based on an Interpolated Elastic Network Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Xiaolin Cheng & Hailong Wang & Barry Grant & Steven M Sine & J Andrew McCammon, 2006. "Targeted Molecular Dynamics Study of C-Loop Closure and Channel Gating in Nicotinic Receptors," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Shaotong Zhu & Akshay Sridhar & Jinfeng Teng & Rebecca J. Howard & Erik Lindahl & Ryan E. Hibbs, 2022. "Structural and dynamic mechanisms of GABAA receptor modulators with opposing activities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Eva Chovancova & Antonin Pavelka & Petr Benes & Ondrej Strnad & Jan Brezovsky & Barbora Kozlikova & Artur Gora & Vilem Sustr & Martin Klvana & Petr Medek & Lada Biedermannova & Jiri Sochor & Jiri Damb, 2012. "CAVER 3.0: A Tool for the Analysis of Transport Pathways in Dynamic Protein Structures," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. David Mowrey & Qiang Chen & Yuhe Liang & Jie Liang & Yan Xu & Pei Tang, 2013. "Signal Transduction Pathways in the Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    6. Arthur A. Melo & Thiemo Sprink & Jeffrey K. Noel & Elena Vázquez-Sarandeses & Chris Hoorn & Saif Mohd & Justus Loerke & Christian M. T. Spahn & Oliver Daumke, 2022. "Cryo-electron tomography reveals structural insights into the membrane remodeling mode of dynamin-like EHD filaments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Eric Gibbs & Emily Klemm & David Seiferth & Arvind Kumar & Serban L. Ilca & Philip C. Biggin & Sudha Chakrapani, 2023. "Conformational transitions and allosteric modulation in a heteromeric glycine receptor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Ryan E Pavlovicz & Brandon J Henderson & Andrew B Bonnell & R Thomas Boyd & Dennis B McKay & Chenglong Li, 2011. "Identification of a Negative Allosteric Site on Human α4β2 and α3β4 Neuronal Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Dan Kozome & Adnan Sljoka & Paola Laurino, 2024. "Remote loop evolution reveals a complex biological function for chitinase enzymes beyond the active site," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Deena R Schmidt & Roberto F Galán & Peter J Thomas, 2018. "Stochastic shielding and edge importance for Markov chains with timescale separation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-35, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0040019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.