IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pet/annals/v18y2018i1p179-186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dimensions and Indicators of Quality Management Assessment in the Context of Sustainable Development

Author

Listed:
  • Monica Aureliana Petcu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Iulia Maria David-Sobolevschi

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina Daniela Cișmașu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Sustainable business development, in an environment marked by strong dynamics that leads to changes of paradigms and meanings of the evolution of various components, generating constraints and multiple risks, is decisively conditioned by the quality of their management. In the context of this paper, in a brief presentation of the characteristics of the management quality assessment was considered, as a process with dynamics connected to the environment, with complex approach dimensions that imply specific reasoning, circumstantially relativized measurement and interpretation techniques, especially with benchmarks in maximizing the satisfaction of all those interested in their work, including communities, as well as environmental protection. The research undertaken for this purpose has been finalized by proposing a set of indicators to provide, from the perspective of each stakeholder, sufficient arguments in the proper assessment of the quality of management and in making appropriate strategic decisions in the context of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Monica Aureliana Petcu & Iulia Maria David-Sobolevschi & Irina Daniela Cișmașu, 2018. "Dimensions and Indicators of Quality Management Assessment in the Context of Sustainable Development," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 18(1), pages 179-186.
    • Handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:18:y:2018:i:1:p:179-186
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.upet.ro/annals/economics/pdf/2018/p1/Petcu_David-Sobolevschi_Cismasu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Christensen & Ellen Peirce & Laura Hartman & W. Hoffman & Jamie Carrier, 2007. "Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability Education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline Data and Future Research Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 347-368, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gavin Price & Andries Walt, 2013. "Changes in Attitudes Towards Business Ethics Held by Former South African Business Management Students," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 429-440, March.
    2. Giorgia Miotto & Marc Polo López & Josep Rom Rodríguez, 2019. "Gender Equality and UN Sustainable Development Goals: Priorities and Correlations in the Top Business Schools’ Communication and Legitimation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Larry Floyd & Feng Xu & Ryan Atkins & Cam Caldwell, 2013. "Ethical Outcomes and Business Ethics: Toward Improving Business Ethics Education," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(4), pages 753-776, November.
    4. Thomas Li-Ping Tang, 2016. "Theory of Monetary Intelligence: Money Attitudes—Religious Values, Making Money, Making Ethical Decisions, and Making the Grade," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 583-603, February.
    5. van Dijke, M.H., 2014. "Understanding Immoral Conduct in Business Settings: A Behavioural Ethics Approach," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management EIA-2014-060-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    6. Maurice Hamington, 2019. "Integrating Care Ethics and Design Thinking," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 91-103, March.
    7. Walter Leal Filho & Amanda Lange Salvia & Fernanda Frankenberger & Noor Adelyna Mohammed Akib & Salil K. Sen & Subarna Sivapalan & Isabel Novo-Corti & Madhavi Venkatesan & Kay Emblen-Perry, 2021. "Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6002-6020, April.
    8. Iwona Bak & Grazyna Wolska & Maciej Oesterreich, 2019. "The Application of Correspondence Analysis in Studies of CSR Awareness at Economic Universities in Poland and Croatia," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 443-456.
    9. Walter Wymer & Sharyn R. Rundle-Thiele, 2017. "Inclusion of ethics, social responsibility, and sustainability in business school curricula: a benchmark study," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(1), pages 19-34, March.
    10. Nuria Toledano, 2020. "Promoting Ethical Reflection in the Teaching of Social Entrepreneurship: A Proposal Using Religious Parables," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 115-132, June.
    11. James Swaim & Michael Maloni & Stuart Napshin & Amy Henley, 2014. "Influences on Student Intention and Behavior Toward Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 465-484, October.
    12. Larrán, Manuel & Andrades, Javier & Herrera, Jesús, 2018. "An examination of attitudes and perceptions of Spanish business and accounting students toward corporate social responsibility and sustainability themes," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 196-205.
    13. Monica Petcu & Eduard Dinu, 2014. "The Integration of the Ethical Dimension into Business Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 917-917, August.
    14. Yanpeng Chen & Wenjun Mai, 2024. "Investor attention and environmental performance of Chinese high-tech companies: the moderating effects of media attention and coverage sentiment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Nikodemus Solitander & Martin Fougere & André Sobczak & Heidi Herlin, 2012. "We Are the Champions: Organizational Learning and Change for Responsible Management Education," Post-Print hal-00956969, HAL.
    16. John G. Cullen, 2017. "Educating Business Students About Sustainability: A Bibliometric Review of Current Trends and Research Needs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 429-439, October.
    17. Elizabeth A. Minton & Soo Jiuan Tan & Siok Kuan Tambyah & Richie L. Liu, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability and Consumer Well-Being: An Ethically-Based Examination of Religious and Cultural Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 167-190, January.
    18. Hoppner, Jessica J. & Vadakkepatt, Gautham G., 2019. "Examining moral authority in the marketplace: A conceptualization and framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 417-427.
    19. Mohsin Abdur Rehman & Muhammad Kashif & Michela Mingione, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability (CSRS) Initiatives among European and Asian Business Schools: A Web-based Content Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1231-1247, October.
    20. Tyson B. Mackey & Alison Mackey & Lisa Jones Christensen & Jason J. Lepore, 2022. "Inducing Corporate Social Responsibility: Should Investors Reward the Responsible or Punish the Irresponsible?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 59-73, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    sustainability; quality; management; performance; indicators;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pet:annals:v:18:y:2018:i:1:p:179-186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Imola Driga (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.upet.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.