IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v11y2024i1d10.1057_s41599-024-03786-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward sustainability: mechanism between work–family balance and fertility intention with decent work as the mediating role

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqing Geng

    (Shanghai Dianji University)

  • Xinying Jiang

    (Shanghai Dianji University)

  • Yan Yan

    (Shanghai Dianji University)

  • Juan Gao

    (Shanghai Dianji University)

  • Jianyi Li

    (Guizhou Nursing Vocational College)

Abstract

The relationship between work and family is essential to sustainability, affecting the fertility intention and fertility behavior of childbearing age. This study aims to explore the following research questions to fill the research gaps: (1) Can WFB improve individuals’ fertility intentions (FI)? (2) How does DW affect individuals’ FI? Drawing on the job demands-resources theory (JD-R) and life history theory, we have developed a theoretical framework of work–family balance (WFB), decent work (DW), fertility intention (FI), organizational support (OS), and family support (FS). Data was collected through a questionnaire in China, and hypotheses were tested. We find that WFB significantly and positively affects DW; DW significantly positively affects FI; WFB significantly influences FI, and DW is a mediator between WFB and FI. However, OS and FS have no significant moderating effects on WFB and DW. The theoretical implications of this study are that it preliminarily explores the spillover effects of DW on family life, enriching the research on DW. The findings can be applied to formulating government policies on fertility support, human resource management practices, and personal work–family development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqing Geng & Xinying Jiang & Yan Yan & Juan Gao & Jianyi Li, 2024. "Toward sustainability: mechanism between work–family balance and fertility intention with decent work as the mediating role," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03786-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-03786-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-03786-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-03786-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shih-Chih & Jiang, Wei & Ma, Yin, 2020. "Decent work in a transition economy: An empirical study of employees in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    2. Francesco C. Billari & Dimiter Philipov & Maria Rita Testa, 2009. "Attitudes, Norms and Perceived Behavioural Control: Explaining Fertility Intentions in Bulgaria [Attitudes, normes et contrôle perçu du comportement: Une explication des intentions de fécondité en ," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 25(4), pages 439-465, November.
    3. Arnstein Aassve & Marco Le Moglie & Letizia Mencarini, 2021. "Trust and fertility in uncertain times," Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 75(1), pages 19-36, January.
    4. Yan Yan & Juan Gao & Xinying Jiang & Yuqing Geng & Enzhong Lin, 2024. "A Study on a New 5S Model of Decent Work Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Jiaping Zhang & Xiaomei Gong, 2023. "How does environmental quality perception influence people's fertility intention? Evidence from China," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(2), pages 272-296, June.
    6. Mara Mațcu-Zaharia & Ioana Alexandra Horodnic & Colin C. Williams & George Cristian Nistor, 2024. "Self-Employed Workers and the Achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: An Overview of Their Social Benefit Entitlements across 31 European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Fausat M. Ibrahim & Oyedunni S. Arulogun, 2020. "Posterity and population growth: fertility intention among a cohort of Nigerian adolescents," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 25-52, March.
    8. Quanbao Jiang & Ying Li & Jesús Sánchez-Barricarte, 2016. "Fertility Intention, Son Preference, and Second Childbirth: Survey Findings from Shaanxi Province of China," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(3), pages 935-953, February.
    9. Wang-Jin Yoo & Inha Oh, 2017. "Effect of Work-Family Balance Policy on Job Selection and Social Sustainability: The Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Bulent Menguc & Seigyoung Auh & Volkan Yeniaras & Constantine S. Katsikeas, 2017. "The role of climate: implications for service employee engagement and customer service performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 428-451, May.
    11. Yan Xiong & Guojin Jiao & Jiaming Zheng & Jian Gao & Yaqing Xue & Buwei Tian & Jingmin Cheng, 2022. "Fertility Intention and Influencing Factors for Having a Second Child among Floating Women of Childbearing Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Marta Graça & Leonor Pais & Lisete Mónico & Nuno Rebelo Dos Santos & Tânia Ferraro & Rita Berger, 2021. "Correction to: Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 941-942, June.
    13. Chung, Min-Su & Lee, Keunjae, 2022. "A recent change in the relation between women's income and childbirth: heterogeneous effects of work-family balance policy," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 88(3), pages 419-445, September.
    14. Marta Graça & Leonor Pais & Lisete Mónico & Nuno Rebelo Dos Santos & Tânia Ferraro & Rita Berger, 2021. "Decent Work and Work Engagement: A Profile Study with Academic Personnel," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(3), pages 917-939, June.
    15. Min-Su CHUNG & Keunjae LEE, 2022. "A recent change in the relation between women's income and childbirth: heterogeneous effects of work-family balance policy," JODE - Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 88(3), pages 419-445, September.
    16. H. Tezcan Uysal & Murat Ak & Seval Turk Guven, 2023. "Shedding light on healthcare workers’ labour behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 14(4), pages 73-86, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadia Abdelhamid Abdelmegeed Abdelwahed & Mohammed A. Al Doghan, 2023. "Developing Employee Productivity and Performance through Work Engagement and Organizational Factors in an Educational Society," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Mariya A. Yukhymenko-Lescroart & Gitima Sharma, 2022. "Measuring Specific Purpose Orientations in Working Adults," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1615-1633, June.
    3. Rasha S. Hassan & Hala M. G. Amin & Hebatallah Ghoneim, 2024. "Decent work and innovative work behavior of academic staff in higher education institutions: the mediating role of work engagement and job self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Yan Yan & Juan Gao & Xinying Jiang & Yuqing Geng & Enzhong Lin, 2024. "A Study on a New 5S Model of Decent Work Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, January.
    5. Miao Lei & Gazi Mahabubul Alam & Aminuddin bin Hassan, 2023. "Job Burnout amongst University Administrative Staff Members in China—A Perspective on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Javed, Rashid & Mughal, Mazhar, 2020. "Preference for boys and length of birth intervals in Pakistan," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 140-152.
    7. Nicoletta Balbo & Francesco C. Billari & Melinda Mills, 2013. "Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 1-38, February.
    8. Arnstein Aassve & Letizia Mencarini & Elena Pirani & Daniele Vignoli, 2023. "The last bastion is falling: Survey evidence of the new demographic reality in Italy," Econometrics Working Papers Archive 2023_04, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Statistica, Informatica, Applicazioni "G. Parenti".
    9. Sahadev, Sunil & Chang, Kirk & Malhotra, Neeru & Kim, Ji-Hee & Ahmed, Tanveer & Kitchen, Philip, 2024. "Psychological empowerment and creative performance: Mediating role of thriving and moderating role of competitive psychological climate," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    10. Nicoletta Balbo & Nicola Barban, 2012. "Does fertility behavior spread among friends?," Working Papers 050, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
    11. Monika Mynarska & Anna Matysiak, 2010. "Women's determination to combine childbearing and paid employment: How can a qualitative approach help us understand quantitative evidence?," Working Papers 26, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    12. Gerda Neyer & Trude Lappegård & Daniele Vignoli, 2013. "Gender Equality and Fertility: Which Equality Matters?," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(3), pages 245-272, August.
    13. Kerstin Ruckdeschel, 2012. "Comparing Desired Fertility And Perceptions Of Motherhood In Germany And France," Demográfia English Edition, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 55(5), pages 5-36.
    14. Xiaodong Zheng & Yanran Zhou, 2024. "Are migrants a threat? Migrant children and human capital investments among local households in urban China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Eun Jung Kim & Min Jung Cho, 2021. "The Association between Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) and Social Perception of Childbearing Deadline Ages: A Cross-Country Examination of Selected EU Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Dimiter Philipov, 2011. "Theories on fertility intentions: a demographer’s perspective," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 37-45.
    17. Powdthavee, Nattavudh & Oswald, Andrew J. & Lockwood, Ben, 2024. "Are environmental concerns deterring people from having children? Longitudinal evidence on births in the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Maria Rita Testa & Francesco Rampazzo, 2018. "From intentions to births: paths of realisation in a multi-dimensional life course," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 16(1), pages 177-198.
    19. Arnstein Aassve & Alice Goisis & Maria Sironi, 2012. "Happiness and Childbearing Across Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 108(1), pages 65-86, August.
    20. Icek Ajzen & Jane Klobas, 2013. "Fertility intentions," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(8), pages 203-232.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:11:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-03786-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.