IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v10y2023i1d10.1057_s41599-023-02360-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring and understanding perceived relationships between doctoral students and their supervisors in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanru Xu

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

  • Ji’an Liu

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

Fit in supervisory relationships is crucial for doctoral students’ outcomes, where supervisory relationships are influenced by cultural and disciplinary contexts. This article qualitatively explores fit or misfit between students’ perceptions and those of their supervisors on supervisory relationships in STEM in the cultural context of Chinese Confucianism. Considered through the lens of person-supervisor fit, two dimensions, consisting of four distinctions of supervisor-doctoral student fit or misfit in supervisory relationships, are identified: (1) a conceptual dimension consisting of supplementary fit or misfit; and (2) a practical dimension consisting of complementary fit or misfit. Supplementary fit is illustrated through three conceptual congruences regarding the nature of doctoral learning, students’ dispositions and the modelling and nurturing roles of supervisors. The term supplementary misfit refers to a conceptual incongruence regarding supervisors’ familial roles, which demonstrates contradictions between sustained cultural influences and the present-day academic profession. Complementary fit includes needs–supplies fit and demands–abilities fit, which bear disciplinary characteristics in modern STEM doctoral education. Complementary misfit refers to supervisors’ strict practices as against students’ demands for autonomy. This article advances the application of the person-supervisor fit perspective in STEM doctoral supervision and contributes to the understanding of disciplinary and cultural influences on the present-day academic supervisory relationships in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanru Xu & Ji’an Liu, 2023. "Exploring and understanding perceived relationships between doctoral students and their supervisors in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02360-z
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-02360-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-023-02360-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-023-02360-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris M. Golde, 2005. "The Role of the Department and Discipline in Doctoral Student Attrition: Lessons from Four Departments," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(6), pages 669-700, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lawson, Cornelia, 2014. "Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201409, University of Turin.
    2. Liina Lepp & Marvi Remmik & Äli Leijen & Djuddah A. J. Leijen, 2016. "Doctoral Students’ Research Stall," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, July.
    3. Amanda M. Kulp, 2020. "Parenting on the Path to the Professoriate: A Focus on Graduate Student Mothers," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 61(3), pages 408-429, May.
    4. Valerie K. Bostwick & Bruce A. Weinberg, 2022. "Nevertheless She Persisted? Gender Peer Effects in Doctoral STEM Programs," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(2), pages 397-436.
    5. Corsini, Alberto & Pezzoni, Michele & Visentin, Fabiana, 2022. "What makes a productive Ph.D. student?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    6. Koen Geven & Jan Skopek & Moris Triventi, 2018. "How to Increase PhD Completion Rates? An Impact Evaluation of Two Reforms in a Selective Graduate School, 1976–2012," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 59(5), pages 529-552, August.
    7. Antonio Caparrós-Ruiz, 2019. "Time to the Doctorate and Research Career: Some Evidence from Spain," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 60(1), pages 111-133, February.
    8. Wullum Nielsen, Mathias & Börjeson, Love, 2019. "Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1617-1632.
    9. Jun Lei & Guangwei Hu, 2015. "Apprenticeship in Scholarly Publishing: A Student Perspective on Doctoral Supervisors’ Roles," Publications, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Nicola Curtin & Janet Malley & Abigail J. Stewart, 2016. "Mentoring the Next Generation of Faculty: Supporting Academic Career Aspirations Among Doctoral Students," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(6), pages 714-738, September.
    11. Jonas Lindahl & Cristian Colliander & Rickard Danell, 2020. "Early career performance and its correlation with gender and publication output during doctoral education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 309-330, January.
    12. Hayter, Christopher S. & Parker, Marla A., 2019. "Factors that influence the transition of university postdocs to non-academic scientific careers: An exploratory study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 556-570.
    13. Caterina Astarita & Anna Crisci, 2023. "Stereotype logistic model: an application to the determinants of doctoral programme satisfaction in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(5), pages 4029-4047, October.
    14. Yonghong Jade Xu, 2016. "Aspirations and Application for Graduate Education: Gender Differences in Low-Participation STEM Disciplines," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(8), pages 913-942, December.
    15. Jaquiline Amani & Helena Myeya & Mariana Mhewa, 2022. "Understanding the Motives for Pursuing Postgraduate Studies and Causes of Late Completion: Supervisors and Supervisees’ Experiences," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    16. Бекова С. К., 2020. "Академическое Самоубийство: Сценарии Отсева В Российской Аспирантуре," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 83-109.
    17. Saule Bekova, 2020. "Academic Suicide: Scenarios of Doctoral Student Attrition in Russia," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 2, pages 83-109.
    18. Delen, Dursun & Topuz, Kazim & Eryarsoy, Enes, 2020. "Development of a Bayesian Belief Network-based DSS for predicting and understanding freshmen student attrition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(3), pages 575-587.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:10:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-023-02360-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.