IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v27y2024i3d10.1057_s41299-023-00168-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Corporate Brands Communicate their Higher Purpose on Social Media: Evidence from Top Global Brands on Twitter

Author

Listed:
  • C. Rudeloff

    (Macromedia University of Applied Sciences)

  • P. Michalski

    (Macromedia University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Rising expectations in society for moral brand behavior have increased the relevance of brand purpose communication on social media. Nevertheless, there is a lack of fundamental research in this area. This study therefore examines brand purpose communication on Twitter, particularly with regard to the values addressed and the communication strategies implemented by corporate brands as well as the corresponding user engagement. A quantitative content analysis of 30 corporate Twitter accounts from 10 industries (n = 6000) shows that brand purpose is communicated across all brands and industries. The values of solidarity and sustainability are in the foreground. In an industry comparison, the FMCG industry and the financial services industry communicate most frequently on brand purpose issues, whereas the media industry and the luxury goods industry do so only marginally. Corporate brands predominantly use information strategy to communicate their brand purpose, although the involvement strategy leads to more engagement. Overall, the analysis shows that the potential of brand purpose communication is not being exploited to the same extent in all industries.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Rudeloff & P. Michalski, 2024. "How Corporate Brands Communicate their Higher Purpose on Social Media: Evidence from Top Global Brands on Twitter," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(3), pages 202-215, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:27:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1057_s41299-023-00168-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41299-023-00168-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41299-023-00168-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41299-023-00168-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer Edson Escalas & James R. Bettman, 2005. "Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(3), pages 378-389, December.
    2. Vignesh Yoganathan & Fraser McLeay & Victoria-Sophie Osburg & David Hart, 2018. "The Core Value Compass: visually evaluating the goodness of brands that do good," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(1), pages 68-83, January.
    3. Thomas Beschorner & Thomas Hajduk, 2017. "Responsible Practices are Culturally Embedded: Theoretical Considerations on Industry-Specific Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 635-642, July.
    4. Marion Dupire & Bouchra M’Zali, 2018. "CSR Strategies in Response to Competitive Pressures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 603-623, March.
    5. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Anne Michaut-Denizeau, 2014. "Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers' viewpoint," Post-Print hal-00977183, HAL.
    6. Claudine Gartenberg & Andrea Prat & George Serafeim, 2019. "Corporate Purpose and Financial Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Rudeloff, Christian & Damms, Julius, 2022. "Entrepreneurs as influencers: the impact of parasocial interactions on communication outcomes," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Abas Mirzaei & Cynthia M. Webster & Helen Siuki, 2021. "Exploring brand purpose dimensions for non-profit organizations," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 186-198, March.
    9. Baobao Song & Jing (Taylor) Wen, 2020. "Online corporate social responsibility communication strategies and stakeholder engagements: A comparison of controversial versus noncontroversial industries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 881-896, March.
    10. Dorothée Baumann-Pauly & Justine Nolan & Auret Heerden & Michael Samway, 2017. "Industry-Specific Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives That Govern Corporate Human Rights Standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 771-787, July.
    11. Hsu, Chung-Kue (Jennifer), 2017. "Selling products by selling brand purpose," Journal of Brand Strategy, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 5(4), pages 373-394, March.
    12. Sourjo Mukherjee & Niek Althuizen, 2020. "Brand Activism: Does Courting Controversy Help or Hurt a Brand?," Post-Print hal-03095886, HAL.
    13. Christian Rudeloff & Stefanie Pakura & Fabian Eggers & Thomas Niemand, 2022. "It takes two to tango: the interplay between decision logics, communication strategies and social media engagement in start-ups," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 681-712, April.
    14. Stephen J. Brammer & Stephen Pavelin, 2006. "Corporate Reputation and Social Performance: The Importance of Fit," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 435-455, May.
    15. Sabrina Lechler & Angelo Canzaniello & Anton Wetzstein & Evi Hartmann, 2020. "Influence of different stakeholders on first-tier suppliers’ sustainable supplier selection: insights from a multiple case study in the automotive first-tier industry," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 425-454, July.
    16. Marina Dabic & Ana Colovic & Olivier Lamotte & Mollie Painter-Morland & Silvana Brozovic, 2016. "Industry-specific CSR: analysis of 20 years of research," Post-Print hal-02907079, HAL.
    17. Agostino Vollero & Francesca Conte & Alfonso Siano & Claudia Covucci, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 141-151, January.
    18. Tanusree Jain & Ruth V. Aguilera & Dima Jamali, 2017. "Corporate Stakeholder Orientation in an Emerging Country Context: A Longitudinal Cross Industry Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 701-719, July.
    19. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    20. Bjorn Lovas & Sumantra Ghoshal, 2000. "Strategy as guided evolution," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(9), pages 875-896, September.
    21. Iain Davies & Zoe Lee & Ine Ahonkhai, 2012. "Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 37-51, March.
    22. Alison Munsch, 2021. "Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 10-29, January.
    23. Friedrich Glauner, 2019. "The Myth of Responsibility: on Changing the Purpose Paradigm," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 5-32, July.
    24. Mukherjee, Sourjo & Althuizen, Niek, 2020. "Brand activism: Does courting controversy help or hurt a brand?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 772-788.
    25. repec:dar:wpaper:132983 is not listed on IDEAS
    26. Herzberg, Mathea & Rudeloff, Christian, 2022. "Should your brand take a stand? Comparing the impact of brand activism and CSR on brand equity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 248-262.
    27. Ko, Eunju & Costello, John P. & Taylor, Charles R., 2019. "What is a luxury brand? A new definition and review of the literature," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 405-413.
    28. Monika Hajdas & Ryszard Kłeczek, 2021. "The real purpose of purpose-driven branding: consumer empowerment and social transformations," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 359-373, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter, Nadine & Föhl, Ulrich & Sander, Frauke & Nies, Angelique, 2024. "Act as you preach! Authentic brand purpose versus “woke washing’s” impact on brand credibility: The moderating role of cause involvement and consumer skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Lee, Zoe & Faridah Syed Alwi, Sharifah & Gambetti, Rossella, 2024. "The thousand faces of beauty: How credible storytelling unlocks disability representation in inclusive luxury fashion branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Stefanie Wannow & Martin Haupt & Martin Ohlwein, 2024. "Is brand activism an emotional affair? The role of moral emotions in consumer responses to brand activism," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 168-192, March.
    4. Janssen, Catherine & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Leblanc, Sina, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-174.
    5. Osburg, Victoria-Sophie & Yoganathan, Vignesh & McLeay, Fraser & Diallo, Mbaye Fall, 2022. "(In)compatibilities in sustainable luxury signals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Zoe Lee & Amanda Spry & Yuksel Ekinci & Jessica Vredenburg, 2024. "From warmth to warrior: impacts of non-profit brand activism on brand bravery, brand hypocrisy and brand equity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 193-211, March.
    7. Aruna Jha & Madhavi Kapoor & Nidhi, 2023. "Can One Size Fit All: A Multi-group Analysis of Indian Corporates," Millennial Asia, , vol. 14(4), pages 535-559, December.
    8. Feng, Yunting & Tong, Xun & Zhu, Qinghua, 2020. "The market value of sustainable practices in the luxury industry: An identity mismatch and institutional theoretical perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Aya Aboelenien & Chau Minh Nguyen, 2024. "From Dr. Seuss to Barbie’s cancellation: brand’s institutional work in response to changed market logics," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 108-125, March.
    10. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    11. Catarina Lelis & Elizete A. Kreutz, 2024. "The Realms of Participation in Visual Identity Design," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 106-119, May.
    12. Silvia Ranfagni & Wilson Ozuem, 2022. "Luxury and Sustainability: Technological Pathways and Potential Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, April.
    13. Pedersen, Carsten Lund, 2023. "The paradoxical marketer: Interpretations, illustrations, and implications," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 765-776.
    14. Silvia Blasi & Lorenzo & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2019. "Eco-friendliness and fashion perceptual attributes of fashion brands: an analysis of consumers’ perceptions based on Twitter data," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0237, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    15. Jenni Sipilä & Sascha Alavi & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Sabrina Dörfer & Christian Schmitz, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility in luxury contexts: potential pitfalls and how to overcome them," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 280-303, March.
    16. Khalifa, Dina & Shukla, Paurav, 2021. "When luxury brand rejection causes brand dilution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 110-121.
    17. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Haque, Tanjum, 2022. "From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 893-907.
    18. Smirti Kutaula & Alvina Gillani & Diana Gregory-Smith & Boris Bartikowski, 2024. "Ethical Consumerism in Emerging Markets: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 651-673, May.
    19. Patrizia Gazzola & Enrica Pavione & Roberta Pezzetti & Daniele Grechi, 2020. "Trends in the Fashion Industry. The Perception of Sustainability and Circular Economy: A Gender/Generation Quantitative Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Anne Michaut-Denizeau, 2020. "Are millennials really more sensitive to sustainable luxury? A cross-generational international comparison of sustainability consciousness when buying luxury," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(1), pages 35-47, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:27:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1057_s41299-023-00168-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.