IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pad/wpaper/0237.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Eco-friendliness and fashion perceptual attributes of fashion brands: an analysis of consumers’ perceptions based on Twitter data

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Blasi

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Padova)

  • Lorenzo

    (Tria s.r.l)

  • Silvia Rita Sedita

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Padova)

Abstract

This research aims at exploring if there is a convergence between the concepts of fashion and eco-friendliness in the consumer perception of a fashion brand. In particular, we assume that an increase in the eco-friendly perception will influence the brand image positively, being this impact much higher for luxury than for high and fast fashion brands. The hypotheses are tested using Twitter data. We analysed all fashion clothing brands with the highest number of followers included in the Socialbakers list and applied a novel social network mining methodology that allows measuring the relationship between each brand and two perceptual attributes (fashion and eco-friendliness). The method is based on the notion of attribute exemplars, which are Twitter accounts that exemplify the attributes. Our exemplars catalyse social media conversations on fashion (identified by the keywords fashion, glamour and style) and eco-friendliness (keywords: environment and ethical business). We computed a similarity function between the followers of the exemplars and those of the brand, based on social network analysis theory. The results suggest that there is a correlation between the fashion and the eco-friendliness perceptual attributes of a brand; this correlation, though, is far stronger for luxury brands than for high and fast fashion brands. The difference in the correlations confirms the tendency of fashion luxury firms over the last few years to consider dealing with environmental issues more and more as a core business and not just as an added value to the firm’s offer.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Blasi & Lorenzo & Silvia Rita Sedita, 2019. "Eco-friendliness and fashion perceptual attributes of fashion brands: an analysis of consumers’ perceptions based on Twitter data," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0237, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    • Handle: RePEc:pad:wpaper:0237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://economia.unipd.it/sites/decon.unipd.it/files/20190237.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter J. Danaher & Isaac W. Wilson & Robert A. Davis, 2003. "A Comparison of Online and Offline Consumer Brand Loyalty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 461-476, February.
    2. Catherine Janssen & Joëlle Vanhamme & Adam Lindgreen & Cécile Lefebvre, 2014. "The Catch-22 of Responsible Luxury: Effects of Luxury Product Characteristics on Consumers’ Perception of Fit with Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(1), pages 45-57, January.
    3. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Anne Michaut-Denizeau, 2014. "Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers' viewpoint," Post-Print hal-00977183, HAL.
    4. Pat Auger & Timothy Devinney, 2007. "Do What Consumers Say Matter? The Misalignment of Preferences with Unconstrained Ethical Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 361-383, December.
    5. Bin Shen, 2014. "Sustainable Fashion Supply Chain: Lessons from H&M," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Aron Culotta & Jennifer Cutler, 2016. "Mining Brand Perceptions from Twitter Social Networks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 343-362, May.
    7. Andrei Shleifer, 2004. "Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(2), pages 414-418, May.
    8. Keller, Kevin Lane, 2003. "Brand Synthesis: The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 595-600, March.
    9. Iain Davies & Zoe Lee & Ine Ahonkhai, 2012. "Do Consumers Care About Ethical-Luxury?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 37-51, March.
    10. Nerlove,Marc, 2005. "Essays in Panel Data Econometrics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521022460, January.
    11. Pereira, Hélia Gonçalves & de Fátima Salgueiro, Maria & Mateus, Inês, 2014. "Say yes to Facebook and get your customers involved! Relationships in a world of social networks," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 695-702.
    12. Ko, Eunju & Hwang, Yoo Kyung & Kim, Eun Young, 2013. "Green marketing' functions in building corporate image in the retail setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1709-1715.
    13. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Vincent Bastien, 2009. "The specificity of luxury management: Turning marketing upside down," Post-Print hal-00493180, HAL.
    14. Hartman, Katherine B. & Spiro, Rosann L., 2005. "Recapturing store image in customer-based store equity: a construct conceptualization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1112-1120, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Isabel Palomo-Domínguez & Rodrigo Elías-Zambrano & Víctor Álvarez-Rodríguez, 2023. "Gen Z’s Motivations towards Sustainable Fashion and Eco-Friendly Brand Attributes: The Case of Vinted," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pengji Wang & Adrian T. H. Kuah & Qinye Lu & Caroline Wong & K. Thirumaran & Emmanuel Adegbite & Wesley Kendall, 2021. "The impact of value perceptions on purchase intention of sustainable luxury brands in China and the UK," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 325-346, May.
    2. Smirti Kutaula & Alvina Gillani & Diana Gregory-Smith & Boris Bartikowski, 2024. "Ethical Consumerism in Emerging Markets: Opportunities and Challenges," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(4), pages 651-673, May.
    3. Fernanda Muniz & Francisco Guzmán, 2021. "Overcoming the conflicting values of luxury branding and CSR by leveraging celebrity endorsements to build brand equity," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 347-358, May.
    4. Joëlle Vanhamme & Adam Lindgreen & Gülen Sarial-Abi, 2023. "Luxury Ethical Consumers: Who Are They?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 805-838, March.
    5. Karatzas, Stelios & Kapoulas, Alexandros & Priporas, Constantinos Vasilios, 2019. "Consumers' perceptions on complexity and prospects of ethical luxury: Qualitative insights from Taiwan," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 224-232.
    6. Sara Alghanim & Nelson Oly Ndubisi, 2022. "The Paradox of Sustainability and Luxury Consumption: The Role of Value Perceptions and Consumer Income," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Feng, Yunting & Tong, Xun & Zhu, Qinghua, 2020. "The market value of sustainable practices in the luxury industry: An identity mismatch and institutional theoretical perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Janssen, Catherine & Vanhamme, Joëlle & Leblanc, Sina, 2017. "Should luxury brands say it out loud? Brand conspicuousness and consumer perceptions of responsible luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 167-174.
    9. Jacqueline C. Wisler, 2018. "U.S. CEOs of SBUs in Luxury Goods Organizations: A Mixed Methods Comparison of Ethical Decision-Making Profiles," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 443-518, May.
    10. Marina Leban & Thyra Uth Thomsen & Sylvia Wallpach & Benjamin G. Voyer, 2021. "Constructing Personas: How High-Net-Worth Social Media Influencers Reconcile Ethicality and Living a Luxury Lifestyle," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 225-239, March.
    11. Anicia Jaegler & Tobias Goessling, 2020. "Sustainability concerns in luxury supply chains: European brand strategies and French consumer expectations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2715-2733, September.
    12. Farhad Aliyev & Ralf Wagner & Stefan Seuring, 2019. "Common and Contradictory Motivations in Buying Intentions for Green and Luxury Automobiles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Amatulli, Cesare & De Angelis, Matteo & Pino, Giovanni & Guido, Gianluigi, 2020. "An investigation of unsustainable luxury: How guilt drives negative word-of-mouth," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 821-836.
    14. Béatrice Parguel & Thierry Delécolle & Aïda Mimouni Chaabane, 2020. "Does Fashionization Impede Luxury Brands’ CSR Image?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Victoria-Sophie Osburg & Iain Davies & Vignesh Yoganathan & Fraser McLeay, 2021. "Perspectives, Opportunities and Tensions in Ethical and Sustainable Luxury: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 201-210, March.
    16. Koronaki, Eirini & Kyrousi, Antigone G. & Panigyrakis, George G., 2018. "The emotional value of arts-based initiatives: Strengthening the luxury brand–consumer relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 406-413.
    17. Marlene Vock, 2022. "Luxurious and responsible? Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility efforts by luxury versus mass-market brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(6), pages 569-583, November.
    18. Felix Septianto & Yuri Seo & Amy Christine Errmann, 2021. "Distinct Effects of Pride and Gratitude Appeals on Sustainable Luxury Brands," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 211-224, March.
    19. Jennifer Kunz & Stephanie May & Holger J. Schmidt, 2020. "Sustainable luxury: current status and perspectives for future research," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(2), pages 541-601, July.
    20. Adıgüzel, Feray & Donato, Carmela, 2021. "Proud to be sustainable: Upcycled versus recycled luxury products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 137-146.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fashion brands; Twitter; consumer perception; environment; ethical business; brand image;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pad:wpaper:0237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Raffaele Dei Campielisi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dspadit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.