IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/crepre/v25y2022i2d10.1057_s41299-021-00113-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Indexes of Dynamism of Corporate Reputation in Conditions of Behavioral Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Vitaliy Shkromyda

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University)

  • Taras Gnatiuk

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University)

  • Nadiya Shkromyda

    (Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University)

Abstract

The effective corporate reputation management in today’s business environment requires new research approaches that are based on a combination of social, psycho-emotional, behavioral and economic theories, and practices. The company’s corporate reputation is formed in retrospect and is being accumulated on the basis of thoughts and impressions due to the relationships with various contact groups. According to the theory of behavioral economics, decisions made by stakeholder are often based on cognitive biases and, as a result, are inconsistent with rational behavior. Under such conditions reputational risks may arise, as the company’s key stakeholders may not take into account the advantages of corporate reputation and its components. In this context, the methodical approach to the corporate reputation management has been proposed on the basis of the structural analysis of the dynamicity of its components. The peculiarity of the approach lies in the construction of a matrix that reflects the list of key stakeholders and main attributes of corporate reputation, the combination of which makes it possible to identify the structural components of the company’s corporate reputation. To study structural changes in the company’s corporate reputation it has been proposed to calculate such indicators: the coefficient of the structural formation of corporate reputation, the coefficient of the coordinated volatility of the corporate reputation components, the coefficient of the direction of change of the corporate reputation components. The calculation of these ratios allowed us to obtain information about the structural content of corporate reputation in the dynamics, namely, taking into account the structural components of the financial and social effects. We believe that the definition of indicators of the dynamics of the structural components of corporate reputation in the aggregate expand the method of evaluating the object of study in the dynamics and complement the information field of the reputation management in terms of behavioral theories.

Suggested Citation

  • Vitaliy Shkromyda & Taras Gnatiuk & Nadiya Shkromyda, 2022. "Evaluation of Indexes of Dynamism of Corporate Reputation in Conditions of Behavioral Economy," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(2), pages 81-93, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:25:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1057_s41299-021-00113-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41299-021-00113-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41299-021-00113-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41299-021-00113-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drew Fudenberg, 2006. "Advancing Beyond Advances in Behavioral Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 694-711, September.
    2. Yoon, Eunsang & Guffey, Hugh J. & Kijewski, Valerie, 1993. "The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 215-228, July.
    3. Rose, Caspar & Thomsen, Steen, 2004. "The Impact of Corporate Reputation on Performance:: Some Danish Evidence," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 201-210, April.
    4. Daniel Kahneman, 2003. "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(5), pages 1449-1475, December.
    5. Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2006. "Behavioral Economics Comes of Age: A Review Essay on Advances in Behavioral Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 712-721, September.
    6. Carl Shapiro, 1983. "Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(4), pages 659-679.
    7. Jan Bebbington & Carlos Larrinaga & Jose M. Moneva, 2008. "Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(3), pages 337-361, March.
    8. Keith Weigelt & Colin Camerer, 1988. "Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(5), pages 443-454, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annika Veh & Markus Göbel & Rick Vogel, 2019. "Corporate reputation in management research: a review of the literature and assessment of the concept," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(2), pages 315-353, December.
    2. Izlem Gozukara & Osman Yildirim, 2015. "The Effect of Perceived Corporate Reputation of a Turkish University on Affective Commitment of Students," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(11), pages 78-93, November.
    3. Delgado García, Juan Bautista & De Quevedo Puente, Esther, 2016. "The complex link of city reputation and city performance. Results for fsQCA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2830-2839.
    4. Albert Caruana & Joseph Vella & Jirka Konietzny & Saviour Chircop, 2018. "Corporate greed: its effect on customer satisfaction, corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation among bank customers," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(3), pages 226-233, December.
    5. Rizwan Ali & Gao Lei Fu & Ramiz Ur Rehman, 2014. "Factors Influencing Customer Loyalty of Banking Industry: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(2), pages 9-26, June.
    6. Adriana Burlea‐Schiopoiu & Dragos Alexandru Balan, 2021. "Modelling the impact of corporate reputation on customers' behaviour," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 1142-1156, May.
    7. Patrizia Fanasch, 2019. "Survival of the fittest: The impact of eco‐certification and reputation on firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 611-628, May.
    8. Ran Zhang & Zabihollah Rezaee, 2009. "Do Credible Firms Perform Better in Emerging Markets? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(2), pages 221-237, December.
    9. Kevin Money & Anastasiya Saraeva & Irene Garnelo-Gomez & Stephen Pain & Carola Hillenbrand, 2017. "Corporate Reputation Past and Future: A Review and Integration of Existing Literature and a Framework for Future Research," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 193-211, November.
    10. María del Mar Ramos-González & Mercedes Rubio-Andrés & Miguel Ángel Sastre-Castillo, 2022. "Effects of socially responsible human resource management (SR-HRM) on innovation and reputation in entrepreneurial SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1205-1233, September.
    11. Tischer, Sven & Hildebrandt, Lutz, 2014. "Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 1007-1017.
    12. Tischer, Sven & Hildebrandt, Lutz, 2011. "Linking corporate reputation and shareholder value using the publication of reputation rankings," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2011-065, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    13. Helm, Sabrina & Garnefeld, Ina & Tolsdorf, Julia, 2009. "Perceived corporate reputation and consumer satisfaction – An experimental exploration of causal relationships," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 69-74.
    14. Gatzert, Nadine, 2015. "The impact of corporate reputation and reputation damaging events on financial performance: Empirical evidence from the literature," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 485-499.
    15. Schulz, Ann-Christine & Johann, Sarah, 2018. "Downsizing and the fragility of corporate reputation: An analysis of the impact of contextual factors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 40-50.
    16. Lex Borghans & Angela Lee Duckworth & James J. Heckman & Bas ter Weel, 2008. "The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 43(4).
    17. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    18. Venkatachalam, Mohan & Rajgopal, Shivaram & Kotha, Suresh, 2000. "Does the Quality of Online Customer Experience Create a Sustainable Competitive Advantage for E-Commerce Firms?," Research Papers 1666, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    19. Shastitko, Andrey & Golovanova, Svetlana, 2016. "Meeting blindly… Is Austrian economics useful for dynamic capabilities theory?," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 86-110.
    20. Benjamin Pfister & Manfred Schwaiger & Tobias Morath, 2020. "Corporate reputation and the future cost of equity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 343-384, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:crepre:v:25:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1057_s41299-021-00113-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.