IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v105y2018i3p645-664..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymptotic post-selection inference for the Akaike information criterion

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Charkhi
  • Gerda Claeskens

Abstract

SummaryIgnoring the model selection step in inference after selection is harmful. In this paper we study the asymptotic distribution of estimators after model selection using the Akaike information criterion. First, we consider the classical setting in which a true model exists and is included in the candidate set of models. We exploit the overselection property of this criterion in constructing a selection region, and we obtain the asymptotic distribution of estimators and linear combinations thereof conditional on the selected model. The limiting distribution depends on the set of competitive models and on the smallest overparameterized model. Second, we relax the assumption on the existence of a true model and obtain uniform asymptotic results. We use simulation to study the resulting post-selection distributions and to calculate confidence regions for the model parameters, and we also apply the method to a diabetes dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Charkhi & Gerda Claeskens, 2018. "Asymptotic post-selection inference for the Akaike information criterion," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 645-664.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:105:y:2018:i:3:p:645-664.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asy018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Belloni & V. Chernozhukov & K. Kato, 2015. "Uniform post-selection inference for least absolute deviation regression and other Z-estimation problems," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 102(1), pages 77-94.
    2. Hjort N.L. & Claeskens G., 2003. "Frequentist Model Average Estimators," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 98, pages 879-899, January.
    3. Maarten Jansen, 2014. "Information criteria for variable selection under sparsity," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(1), pages 37-55.
    4. Kabaila, Paul & Leeb, Hannes, 2006. "On the Large-Sample Minimal Coverage Probability of Confidence Intervals After Model Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 619-629, June.
    5. Gerda Claeskens & Nils Lid Hjort, 2004. "Goodness of Fit via Non‐parametric Likelihood Ratios," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 31(4), pages 487-513, December.
    6. Bradley Efron, 2014. "Estimation and Accuracy After Model Selection," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 991-1007, September.
    7. Vuong, Quang H, 1989. "Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-nested Hypotheses," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(2), pages 307-333, March.
    8. Leeb, Hannes & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2005. "Model Selection And Inference: Facts And Fiction," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 21-59, February.
    9. Kabaila, Paul, 1998. "Valid Confidence Intervals In Regression After Variable Selection," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 463-482, August.
    10. Victor Chernozhukov & Christian Hansen & Martin Spindler, 2015. "Valid Post-Selection and Post-Regularization Inference: An Elementary, General Approach," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 649-688, August.
    11. Ryan J. Tibshirani & Jonathan Taylor & Richard Lockhart & Robert Tibshirani, 2016. "Exact Post-Selection Inference for Sequential Regression Procedures," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 600-620, April.
    12. Danilov, Dmitry & Magnus, J.R.Jan R., 2004. "On the harm that ignoring pretesting can cause," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 27-46, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lasanthi C. R. Pelawa Watagoda & David J. Olive, 2021. "Comparing six shrinkage estimators with large sample theory and asymptotically optimal prediction intervals," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2407-2431, October.
    2. Rügamer, David & Baumann, Philipp F.M. & Greven, Sonja, 2022. "Selective inference for additive and linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Kramlinger, Peter & Schneider, Ulrike & Krivobokova, Tatyana, 2023. "Uniformly valid inference based on the Lasso in linear mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Jelle J Goeman & Aldo Solari, 2024. "On selection and conditioning in multiple testing and selective inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(2), pages 393-416.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis J. DiTraglia, 2011. "Using Invalid Instruments on Purpose: Focused Moment Selection and Averaging for GMM, Second Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-045, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 09 Dec 2014.
    2. DiTraglia, Francis J., 2016. "Using invalid instruments on purpose: Focused moment selection and averaging for GMM," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 187-208.
    3. Francis DiTraglia, 2011. "Using Invalid Instruments on Purpose: Focused Moment Selection and Averaging for GMM, Second Version," PIER Working Paper Archive 15-027, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 10 Aug 2015.
    4. Shaobo Jin, 2022. "Frequentist Model Averaging in Structure Equation Model With Ordinal Data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(3), pages 1130-1145, September.
    5. Leeb, Hannes & Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2008. "Can One Estimate The Unconditional Distribution Of Post-Model-Selection Estimators?," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 338-376, April.
    6. John Copas & Shinto Eguchi, 2020. "Strong model dependence in statistical analysis: goodness of fit is not enough for model choice," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(2), pages 329-352, April.
    7. Paul Kabaila, 2009. "The Coverage Properties of Confidence Regions After Model Selection," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 77(3), pages 405-414, December.
    8. Lenard Lieb & Stephan Smeekes, 2017. "Inference for Impulse Responses under Model Uncertainty," Papers 1709.09583, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    9. Ruoyao Shi & Zhipeng Liao, 2018. "An Averaging GMM Estimator Robust to Misspecification," Working Papers 201803, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    10. Leeb, Hannes & Pötscher, Benedikt M. & Ewald, Karl, 2014. "On various confidence intervals post-model-selection," MPRA Paper 52858, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. McCloskey, Adam, 2017. "Bonferroni-based size-correction for nonstandard testing problems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 17-35.
    12. Magnus, Jan R. & Wan, Alan T.K. & Zhang, Xinyu, 2011. "Weighted average least squares estimation with nonspherical disturbances and an application to the Hong Kong housing market," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1331-1341, March.
    13. Ruth M. Pfeiffer & Andrew Redd & Raymond J. Carroll, 2017. "On the impact of model selection on predictor identification and parameter inference," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 667-690, June.
    14. Pötscher, Benedikt M., 2007. "Confidence Sets Based on Sparse Estimators Are Necessarily Large," MPRA Paper 5677, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Schomaker, Michael & Heumann, Christian, 2014. "Model selection and model averaging after multiple imputation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 758-770.
    16. Alexandre Belloni & Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Christian Hansen & Kengo Kato, 2018. "High-dimensional econometrics and regularized GMM," CeMMAP working papers CWP35/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Wan, Alan T.K. & Zhang, Xinyu & Zou, Guohua, 2010. "Least squares model averaging by Mallows criterion," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 277-283, June.
    18. Mur, Jesús & Angulo, Ana, 2009. "Model selection strategies in a spatial setting: Some additional results," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 200-213, March.
    19. Victor Chernozhukov & Whitney K. Newey & Victor Quintas-Martinez & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2021. "Automatic Debiased Machine Learning via Riesz Regression," Papers 2104.14737, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    20. Domenico Giannone & Michele Lenza & Giorgio E. Primiceri, 2021. "Economic Predictions With Big Data: The Illusion of Sparsity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2409-2437, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:105:y:2018:i:3:p:645-664.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.