IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/joeems/10.5771-0949-6181-2021-4-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board Interlocks as a Diffusion of Strategic Information – Does it Work? A Polish Case

Author

Listed:
  • Światowiec-Szczepańska, Justyna
  • Małys, Łukasz

Abstract

Several theories point to the influence of board interlocks on the diffusion of important resources, mainly information. Empirical confirmation of the information functionality of the interlocking directorates network was obtained in the case of network research under the Anglo-Saxon model of corporate governance as well as the continental model in developed countries. Since the early 1990s another model of corporate governance in CEE countries has been developed. The specific determinants of the development of this model do not allow us to unequivocally state similar causes and consequences of interlocking directorates in relation to the most frequently studied western corporate governance models. The aim of this study is to determine the importance managers attach to these relationships within a corporate network as a source of strategic information that is important to the company’s strategic decision-making process, in the context of the Polish governance model. The research employs the case-study method and presents the results of five case studies of companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. The research, on the one hand, suggests that the network embeddedness of Polish listed companies is of minor significance; on the other hand, it pointed to the existence of two main types of corporate networks: one inwardly directed and focused on supervisory board members’ controlling function performed with a view to protecting the shareholders’ equity ownership, and the other orientated towards external relationships, often distant from the original industry, in order to obtain information that supports new initiatives. What seems to most determine the behaviour of company managers is the corporate culture resulting from the presence of a foreign owner from a Western European country. In general, the findings confirm the importance of the network of interlocking directorates more as an instrument of control than diffusion of strategic information.

Suggested Citation

  • Światowiec-Szczepańska, Justyna & Małys, Łukasz, 2021. "Board Interlocks as a Diffusion of Strategic Information – Does it Work? A Polish Case," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(4), pages 589-616.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:joeems:10.5771/0949-6181-2021-4-589
    DOI: 10.5771/0949-6181-2021-4-589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0949-6181-2021-4-589
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/0949-6181-2021-4-589?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fich, Eliezer M. & White, Lawrence J., 2005. "Why do CEOs reciprocally sit on each other's boards?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 11(1-2), pages 175-195, March.
    2. Marta Młokosiewicz & Sandra Misiak-Kwit, 2017. "The Impact of Trust on Entrepreneurship in Poland," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(4), pages 79-95.
    3. Stephen P. Ferris & Murali Jagannathan & A. C. Pritchard, 2003. "Too Busy to Mind the Business? Monitoring by Directors with Multiple Board Appointments," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(3), pages 1087-1111, June.
    4. Jeroen Weimer & Joost Pape, 1999. "A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 152-166, April.
    5. Tim Rowley & Dean Behrens & David Krackhardt, 2000. "Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 369-386, March.
    6. Stephen P. Borgatti & Rob Cross, 2003. "A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 432-445, April.
    7. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226531083 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Akbar Zaheer & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2005. "Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 809-825, September.
    9. B. Tomka, 2001. "Interlocking Directorates of Banks and Industrial Companies in Hungary at the Beginning of the Twentieth Century," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 25-42.
    10. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:3:p:1087-1112 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Dariusz Siudak, 2020. "The Influence of Interlocking Directorates on the Propensity of Dividend Payout to the Parent Company," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-16, May.
    12. Brian Boyd, 1990. "Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(6), pages 419-430, October.
    13. Joris Knoben & Leon A. G. Oerlemans & Annefleur R. Krijkamp & Keith G. Provan, 2018. "What Do They Know? The Antecedents of Information Accuracy Differentials in Interorganizational Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 471-488, June.
    14. Martin J. Conyon & Mark R. Muldoon, 2006. "The Small World of Corporate Boards," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9‐10), pages 1321-1343, November.
    15. Thomas Koenig & Robert Gogel, 1981. "Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 37-50, January.
    16. Hallock, Kevin F., 1997. "Reciprocally Interlocking Boards of Directors and Executive Compensation," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 331-344, September.
    17. Martin J. Conyon & Mark R. Muldoon, 2006. "The Small World of Corporate Boards," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(9-10), pages 1321-1343.
    18. Erik Noyes & Candy Brush & Ken Hatten & Laurel Smith‐doerr, 2014. "Firm Network Position and Corporate Venture Capital Investment," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(4), pages 713-731, October.
    19. Windolf, Paul, 2002. "Corporate Networks in Europe and the United States," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199256976.
    20. Carney, Richard W. & Child, Travers Barclay & Li, Xiang, 2020. "Board connections and crisis performance: Family, state, and political networks," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    21. Garry Robins & Malcolm Alexander, 2004. "Small Worlds Among Interlocking Directors: Network Structure and Distance in Bipartite Graphs," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 69-94, May.
    22. Eelke M. Heemskerk & Frank W. Takes, 2016. "The Corporate Elite Community Structure of Global Capitalism," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 90-118, February.
    23. Braun, Matías & Briones, Ignacio & Islas, Gonzalo, 2019. "Interlocking directorates, access to credit, and business performance in Chile during early industrialization," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 381-388.
    24. Geoffrey Martin & Remzi Gözübüyük & Manuel Becerra, 2015. "Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock-performance relationship," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 235-253, February.
    25. Luis Diestre & Nandini Rajagopalan & Shantanu Dutta, 2015. "Constraints in acquiring and utilizing directors' experience: An empirical study of new-market entry in the pharmaceutical industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 339-359, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael C. Withers & Michael D. Howard & Laszlo Tihanyi, 2020. "You’ve Got a Friend: Examining Board Interlock Formation After Financial Restatements," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 742-769, May.
    2. Mishael Milaković & Simone Alfarano & Thomas Lux, 2010. "The small core of the German corporate board network," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 201-215, June.
    3. Tetsuji Okazaki & Michiru Sawada, 2012. "Interbank networks in prewar Japan: structure and implications," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 21(2), pages 463-506, April.
    4. Teng, Ying & Ma, Zhenzhong & Liang, Dapeng & Song, Shenyi & Zheng, Yuhang, 2024. "The moderating effect of national culture on board interlocks’ impact on firm performance: A meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Sankowska, Anna & Siudak, Dariusz, 2016. "The small world phenomenon and assortative mixing in Polish corporate board and director networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 443(C), pages 309-315.
    6. Bénédicte Brullebaut & Isabelle Allemand & Enrico Prinz & Florence Thépot, 2022. "Persistence in corporate networks through boards of directors? A longitudinal study of interlocks in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1743-1782, August.
    7. Mauro Romano & Christian Favino & Luca Pennacchio & Francesco Grimaldi, 2020. "CEO social capital in family businesses and its effect on investment opportunities: Asset or liability?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2004-2015, September.
    8. Olga A. Novoselova, 2022. "What matters for interorganizational connectedness? Locating the drivers of multiplex corporate networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 872-899, April.
    9. Szymon Kaczmarek & Satomi Kimino & Annie Pye, 2014. "Interlocking directorships and firm performance in highly regulated sectors: the moderating impact of board diversity," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 18(2), pages 347-372, May.
    10. Tristan Auvray & Olivier Brossard, 2016. "French connections: interlocking directorates and ownership network in an insider governance system," Post-Print hal-01372455, HAL.
    11. Lucia Bellenzier & Rosanna Grassi, 2014. "Interlocking directorates in Italy: persistent links in network dynamics," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 9(2), pages 183-202, October.
    12. Renee B. Adams & Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael S. Weisbach, 2010. "The Role of Boards of Directors in Corporate Governance: A Conceptual Framework and Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(1), pages 58-107, March.
    13. Lauren Cohen & Andrea Frazzini & Christopher Malloy, 2008. "The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 951-979, October.
    14. Kirchmaier, Thomas & Stathopoulos, Konstantinos, 2008. "From fiction to fact: the impact of CEO social networks," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24427, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Julia Brennecke & Olaf N. Rank, 2017. "Tie heterogeneity in networks of interlocking directorates: a cost–benefit approach to firms’ tie choice," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(1), pages 97-122, June.
    16. Erik Devos & Andrew Prevost & John Puthenpurackal, 2009. "Are Interlocked Directors Effective Monitors?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 861-887, December.
    17. Kambar Farooq & Muhammad Azeem & Chin Man Chui & Jun (Tony) Ruan, 2023. "Board Connections and Dividend Policy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(4), pages 983-1040, December.
    18. Krijkamp, Annefleur R. & Knoben, Joris & Oerlemans, Leon A.G. & Leenders, Roger T.A.J., 2021. "An ace in the hole: The effects of (in)accurately observed structural holes on organizational reputation positions in whole networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 703-713.
    19. Matthias Raddant & Mishael Milaković & Laura Birg, 2017. "Persistence in corporate networks," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(2), pages 249-276, July.
    20. Claudine Salgado & Guilherme Schneider & Cristiano M. Costa, 2022. "Does board interlock affect CEO compensation? Evidence from companies listed in the Brazilian stock exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 444-465, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:joeems:10.5771/0949-6181-2021-4-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.