IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v40y1981i1p37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Koenig
  • Robert Gogel

Abstract

. Outside directors are now a majority on the boards of the‘Fortune 500’corporations creating a network of interconnections through interlocking directorates. Details of this phenomenon and explanations for its significance can be found in an earlier article in this Journal*. This network can be visualized as a system through which common norms, values, and a sense of “weness” can flow. This sense of being part of a corporate establishment would have significant effects on corporate conduct. From what top corporate leaders say and do, the validity and implications of this hypothesis are examined. This class hegemony theory views power as shared within a system of social relationships, in contrast to the management control theory which considers management as in total control.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Koenig & Robert Gogel, 1981. "Interlocking Corporate Directorships as a Social Network," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 37-50, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:40:y:1981:i:1:p:37-50
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01370.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01370.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1981.tb01370.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sapinski, Jean Philippe & Carroll, William K., 2017. "Interlocking directorates and corporate networks," SocArXiv 7t8c9, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jana Oehmichen & Marc Steffen & Michael Wolff, 2010. "Der Einfluss der Aufsichtsratszusammensetzung auf die Präsenz von Frauen in Aufsichtsräten," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 503-532, August.
    3. Carroll, William K. & Sapinski, Jean Philippe, 2017. "Corporate elites and intercorporate networks," SocArXiv 43w7s, Center for Open Science.
    4. Erik Devos & Andrew Prevost & John Puthenpurackal, 2009. "Are Interlocked Directors Effective Monitors?," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 38(4), pages 861-887, December.
    5. Michael C. Withers & Michael D. Howard & Laszlo Tihanyi, 2020. "You’ve Got a Friend: Examining Board Interlock Formation After Financial Restatements," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 742-769, May.
    6. Zhao, Tianjiao, 2021. "Board network, investment efficiency, and the mediating role of CSR: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 897-919.
    7. Chen Chen & David K. Ding & William R. Wilson, 2021. "The Old Boys Club in New Zealand Listed Companies," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-21, July.
    8. Suzette Viviers & Nadia Mans-Kemp, 2019. "Director overboardedness in South Africa: evaluating the experience and busyness hypotheses," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(1), pages 68-81, March.
    9. Atanasko Atanasovski, 2012. "Impact of Cross-listed Directorship on Appointment and Independence of Auditors: Evidence from Republic of Macedonia," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 4(4), pages 76-82, August.
    10. Ludovico Alcorta, 1986. "Perspectivas de la centralización económica: un balance bibliográfico," Apuntes. Revista de ciencias sociales, Fondo Editorial, Universidad del Pacífico, vol. 13(19), pages 3-51.
    11. Chen Hao & Xuegang Feng & Dandan Wu & Xiaodong Guo, 2024. "Board interlocks and corporate risk-taking: An empirical analysis of listed companies from tourism and related industries in China," Tourism Economics, , vol. 30(1), pages 174-211, February.
    12. Christine Mallin & Giovanna Michelon & Davide Raggi, 2013. "Monitoring Intensity and Stakeholders’ Orientation: How Does Governance Affect Social and Environmental Disclosure?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 29-43, April.
    13. Kambar Farooq & Muhammad Azeem & Chin Man Chui & Jun (Tony) Ruan, 2023. "Board Connections and Dividend Policy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 59(4), pages 983-1040, December.
    14. Światowiec-Szczepańska, Justyna & Małys, Łukasz, 2021. "Board Interlocks as a Diffusion of Strategic Information – Does it Work? A Polish Case," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 26(4), pages 589-616.
    15. Beng Wee Goh & Jimmy Lee & Jeffrey Ng & Kevin Ow Yong, 2016. "The Effect of Board Independence on Information Asymmetry," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 155-182, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:40:y:1981:i:1:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.