IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/natcom/v14y2023i1d10.1038_s41467-023-41393-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A cleavage rule for selection of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants with high efficiency and no detectable off-targets

Author

Listed:
  • Péter István Kulcsár

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences)

  • András Tálas

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences)

  • Zoltán Ligeti

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Biological Research Centre
    University of Szeged)

  • Eszter Tóth

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences)

  • Zsófia Rakvács

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences)

  • Zsuzsa Bartos

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences)

  • Sarah Laura Krausz

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Biospiral-2006 Ltd
    Semmelweis University)

  • Ágnes Welker

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Gene Design Ltd)

  • Vanessza Laura Végi

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Biospiral-2006 Ltd)

  • Krisztina Huszár

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Gene Design Ltd)

  • Ervin Welker

    (Research Centre for Natural Sciences
    Biological Research Centre)

Abstract

Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) has been employed as a genome engineering tool with a promising potential within therapeutics. However, its off-target effects present major safety concerns for applications requiring high specificity. Approaches developed to date to mitigate this effect, including any of the increased-fidelity (i.e., high-fidelity) SpCas9 variants, only provide efficient editing on a relatively small fraction of targets without detectable off-targets. Upon addressing this problem, we reveal a rather unexpected cleavability ranking of target sequences, and a cleavage rule that governs the on-target and off-target cleavage of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants but not that of SpCas9-NG or xCas9. According to this rule, for each target, an optimal variant with matching fidelity must be identified for efficient cleavage without detectable off-target effects. Based on this insight, we develop here an extended set of variants, the CRISPRecise set, with increased fidelity spanning across a wide range, with differences in fidelity small enough to comprise an optimal variant for each target, regardless of its cleavability ranking. We demonstrate efficient editing with maximum specificity even on those targets that have not been possible in previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Eszter Tóth & Zsófia Rakvács & Zsuzsa Bartos & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ágnes Welker & Vanessza Laura Végi & Krisztina Huszár & Ervin Welker, 2023. "A cleavage rule for selection of increased-fidelity SpCas9 variants with high efficiency and no detectable off-targets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41393-5
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41393-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-41393-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41467-023-41393-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winston X. Yan & Reza Mirzazadeh & Silvano Garnerone & David Scott & Martin W. Schneider & Tomasz Kallas & Joaquin Custodio & Erik Wernersson & Yinqing Li & Linyi Gao & Yana Federova & Bernd Zetsche &, 2017. "BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, August.
    2. Johnny H. Hu & Shannon M. Miller & Maarten H. Geurts & Weixin Tang & Liwei Chen & Ning Sun & Christina M. Zeina & Xue Gao & Holly A. Rees & Zhi Lin & David R. Liu, 2018. "Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity," Nature, Nature, vol. 556(7699), pages 57-63, April.
    3. Jungjoon K. Lee & Euihwan Jeong & Joonsun Lee & Minhee Jung & Eunji Shin & Young-hoon Kim & Kangin Lee & Inyoung Jung & Daesik Kim & Seokjoong Kim & Jin-Soo Kim, 2018. "Directed evolution of CRISPR-Cas9 to increase its specificity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    4. John C. Rose & Nicholas A. Popp & Christopher D. Richardson & Jason J. Stephany & Julie Mathieu & Cindy T. Wei & Jacob E. Corn & Dustin J. Maly & Douglas M. Fowler, 2020. "Suppression of unwanted CRISPR-Cas9 editing by co-administration of catalytically inactivating truncated guide RNAs," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. András Tálas & Dorottya A. Simon & Péter I. Kulcsár & Éva Varga & Sarah L. Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2021. "BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Daphne Collias & Chase L. Beisel, 2021. "CRISPR technologies and the search for the PAM-free nuclease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Alexis C. Komor & Yongjoo B. Kim & Michael S. Packer & John A. Zuris & David R. Liu, 2016. "Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage," Nature, Nature, vol. 533(7603), pages 420-424, May.
    8. Janice S. Chen & Yavuz S. Dagdas & Benjamin P. Kleinstiver & Moira M. Welch & Alexander A. Sousa & Lucas B. Harrington & Samuel H. Sternberg & J. Keith Joung & Ahmet Yildiz & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2017. "Enhanced proofreading governs CRISPR–Cas9 targeting accuracy," Nature, Nature, vol. 550(7676), pages 407-410, October.
    9. Youngbin Lim & So Young Bak & Keewon Sung & Euihwan Jeong & Seung Hwan Lee & Jin-Soo Kim & Sangsu Bae & Seong Keun Kim, 2016. "Structural roles of guide RNAs in the nuclease activity of Cas9 endonuclease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Benjamin P. Kleinstiver & Michelle S. Prew & Shengdar Q. Tsai & Ved V. Topkar & Nhu T. Nguyen & Zongli Zheng & Andrew P. W. Gonzales & Zhuyun Li & Randall T. Peterson & Jing-Ruey Joanna Yeh & Martin J, 2015. "Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities," Nature, Nature, vol. 523(7561), pages 481-485, July.
    11. Samuel H. Sternberg & Benjamin LaFrance & Matias Kaplan & Jennifer A. Doudna, 2015. "Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9," Nature, Nature, vol. 527(7576), pages 110-113, November.
    12. Mu-Sen Liu & Shanzhong Gong & Helen-Hong Yu & Kyungseok Jung & Kenneth A. Johnson & David W. Taylor, 2020. "Engineered CRISPR/Cas9 enzymes improve discrimination by slowing DNA cleavage to allow release of off-target DNA," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Pranam Chatterjee & Jooyoung Lee & Lisa Nip & Sabrina R. T. Koseki & Emma Tysinger & Erik J. Sontheimer & Joseph M. Jacobson & Noah Jakimo, 2020. "A Cas9 with PAM recognition for adenine dinucleotides," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    14. Andrew V. Anzalone & Peyton B. Randolph & Jessie R. Davis & Alexander A. Sousa & Luke W. Koblan & Jonathan M. Levy & Peter J. Chen & Christopher Wilson & Gregory A. Newby & Aditya Raguram & David R. L, 2019. "Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA," Nature, Nature, vol. 576(7785), pages 149-157, December.
    15. Jennifer A. Doudna, 2020. "The promise and challenge of therapeutic genome editing," Nature, Nature, vol. 578(7794), pages 229-236, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianli Tao & Daniel E. Bauer & Roberto Chiarle, 2023. "Assessing and advancing the safety of CRISPR-Cas tools: from DNA to RNA editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Giulia I. Corsi & Kunli Qu & Ferhat Alkan & Xiaoguang Pan & Yonglun Luo & Jan Gorodkin, 2022. "CRISPR/Cas9 gRNA activity depends on free energy changes and on the target PAM context," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Péter István Kulcsár & András Tálas & Zoltán Ligeti & Sarah Laura Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2022. "SuperFi-Cas9 exhibits remarkable fidelity but severely reduced activity yet works effectively with ABE8e," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Lin Zhao & Sabrina R. T. Koseki & Rachel A. Silverstein & Nadia Amrani & Christina Peng & Christian Kramme & Natasha Savic & Martin Pacesa & Tomás C. Rodríguez & Teodora Stan & Emma Tysinger & Lauren , 2023. "PAM-flexible genome editing with an engineered chimeric Cas9," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8, December.
    5. András Tálas & Dorottya A. Simon & Péter I. Kulcsár & Éva Varga & Sarah L. Krausz & Ervin Welker, 2021. "BEAR reveals that increased fidelity variants can successfully reduce the mismatch tolerance of adenine but not cytosine base editors," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Burcu Bestas & Sandra Wimberger & Dmitrii Degtev & Alexandra Madsen & Antje K. Rottner & Fredrik Karlsson & Sergey Naumenko & Megan Callahan & Julia Liz Touza & Margherita Francescatto & Carl Ivar Möl, 2023. "A Type II-B Cas9 nuclease with minimized off-targets and reduced chromosomal translocations in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Dawn G. L. Thean & Hoi Yee Chu & John H. C. Fong & Becky K. C. Chan & Peng Zhou & Cynthia C. S. Kwok & Yee Man Chan & Silvia Y. L. Mak & Gigi C. G. Choi & Joshua W. K. Ho & Zongli Zheng & Alan S. L. W, 2022. "Machine learning-coupled combinatorial mutagenesis enables resource-efficient engineering of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editor activities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Annabel K. Sangree & Audrey L. Griffith & Zsofia M. Szegletes & Priyanka Roy & Peter C. DeWeirdt & Mudra Hegde & Abby V. McGee & Ruth E. Hanna & John G. Doench, 2022. "Benchmarking of SpCas9 variants enables deeper base editor screens of BRCA1 and BCL2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Maarten H. Geurts & Shashank Gandhi & Matteo G. Boretto & Ninouk Akkerman & Lucca L. M. Derks & Gijs Son & Martina Celotti & Sarina Harshuk-Shabso & Flavia Peci & Harry Begthel & Delilah Hendriks & Pa, 2023. "One-step generation of tumor models by base editor multiplexing in adult stem cell-derived organoids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Daphne Collias & Elena Vialetto & Jiaqi Yu & Khoa Co & Éva d. H. Almási & Ann-Sophie Rüttiger & Tatjana Achmedov & Till Strowig & Chase L. Beisel, 2023. "Systematically attenuating DNA targeting enables CRISPR-driven editing in bacteria," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    11. Xiaoguang Pan & Kunli Qu & Hao Yuan & Xi Xiang & Christian Anthon & Liubov Pashkova & Xue Liang & Peng Han & Giulia I. Corsi & Fengping Xu & Ping Liu & Jiayan Zhong & Yan Zhou & Tao Ma & Hui Jiang & J, 2022. "Massively targeted evaluation of therapeutic CRISPR off-targets in cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Zhaohui Zhong & Guanqing Liu & Zhongjie Tang & Shuyue Xiang & Liang Yang & Lan Huang & Yao He & Tingting Fan & Shishi Liu & Xuelian Zheng & Tao Zhang & Yiping Qi & Jian Huang & Yong Zhang, 2023. "Efficient plant genome engineering using a probiotic sourced CRISPR-Cas9 system," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Xiangfeng Kong & Hainan Zhang & Guoling Li & Zikang Wang & Xuqiang Kong & Lecong Wang & Mingxing Xue & Weihong Zhang & Yao Wang & Jiajia Lin & Jingxing Zhou & Xiaowen Shen & Yinghui Wei & Na Zhong & W, 2023. "Engineered CRISPR-OsCas12f1 and RhCas12f1 with robust activities and expanded target range for genome editing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Jian Wang & Yuxi Teng & Ruihua Zhang & Yifei Wu & Lei Lou & Yusong Zou & Michelle Li & Zhong-Ru Xie & Yajun Yan, 2021. "Engineering a PAM-flexible SpdCas9 variant as a universal gene repressor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    15. Yi-Li Feng & Qian Liu & Ruo-Dan Chen & Si-Cheng Liu & Zhi-Cheng Huang & Kun-Ming Liu & Xiao-Ying Yang & An-Yong Xie, 2022. "DNA nicks induce mutational signatures associated with BRCA1 deficiency," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Marion Rosello & Malo Serafini & Luca Mignani & Dario Finazzi & Carine Giovannangeli & Marina C. Mione & Jean-Paul Concordet & Filippo Del Bene, 2022. "Disease modeling by efficient genome editing using a near PAM-less base editor in vivo," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Zeyu Lu & Lingtian Zhang & Qing Mu & Junyang Liu & Yu Chen & Haoyuan Wang & Yanjun Zhang & Rui Su & Ruijun Wang & Zhiying Wang & Qi Lv & Zhihong Liu & Jiasen Liu & Yunhua Li & Yanhong Zhao, 2024. "Progress in Research and Prospects for Application of Precision Gene-Editing Technology Based on CRISPR–Cas9 in the Genetic Improvement of Sheep and Goats," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Zsolt Bodai & Alena L. Bishop & Valentino M. Gantz & Alexis C. Komor, 2022. "Targeting double-strand break indel byproducts with secondary guide RNAs improves Cas9 HDR-mediated genome editing efficiencies," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Jeonghun Kwon & Minyoung Kim & Seungmin Bae & Anna Jo & Youngho Kim & Jungjoon K. Lee, 2022. "TAPE-seq is a cell-based method for predicting genome-wide off-target effects of prime editor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Jeremy Vicencio & Carlos Sánchez-Bolaños & Ismael Moreno-Sánchez & David Brena & Charles E. Vejnar & Dmytro Kukhtar & Miguel Ruiz-López & Mariona Cots-Ponjoan & Alejandro Rubio & Natalia Rodrigo Meler, 2022. "Genome editing in animals with minimal PAM CRISPR-Cas9 enzymes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:14:y:2023:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-023-41393-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.